• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

5.0 headers on 351W in a 65?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nillle
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

nillle

New Member
Apr 24, 2005
12
0
0
Sweden
May 16, 2006
#1
  • May 16, 2006
  • #1
As the title reads.. I'm thinking of fitting 5.0 shorty headers in my 65 mustang with a 351W and 4 speed tranny. Does anyone here have experience from this?
What worries me is that the engine mounts and clutch linkage may not clear.
Thanks
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
May 16, 2006
#2
  • May 16, 2006
  • #2
They won't fit. Get the 351 swap headers for early mustangs.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
May 16, 2006
#3
  • May 16, 2006
  • #3
I agree. I don't think any type of fox-body header will fit in an early model, unless you've cut out the shock towers. You need the 351 swap headers.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 16, 2006
#4
  • May 16, 2006
  • #4
those 5.0 headers wont even fit on a 289 or 302, let alone a 351
 

RMODEL65

Member
Jul 6, 2005
313
1
18
brunswick ga
May 16, 2006
#5
  • May 16, 2006
  • #5
doesnt jba have a shorty header for 351w swaps?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 17, 2006
#6
  • May 17, 2006
  • #6
RMODEL65 said:
doesnt jba have a shorty header for 351w swaps?
Click to expand...

yep, for pretty close to $500.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
May 17, 2006
#7
  • May 17, 2006
  • #7
rbohm said:
yep, for pretty close to $500.
Click to expand...

If he is going to pay that price, he might as well get good full headers for the same price from someplace like Accufab or FRP.
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
May 17, 2006
#8
  • May 17, 2006
  • #8
Anyone other than JBA make 351 swap headers?
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
May 17, 2006
#9
  • May 17, 2006
  • #9
yep.
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
May 17, 2006
#10
  • May 17, 2006
  • #10
FRP DOES NOT make headers for a 351W in a 65 Stang. I have already spoken to Stan several times since I repeatedly read this on the forum and he repeatedly told me NO. He said it's just too tight for him to make a good set and he rather not do it. He asked me if anybody has a set of his headers on a 65-66 Mustang with a 351W, to get the part number and call him back because he would like to know how they did it!

I called AccuFab and they told me almost the same thing but that their headers would hang low just like the Hooker Supercomps currently on my car. They are about 1.5-2" above ground level and my car is lowered about 2".
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
May 17, 2006
#11
  • May 17, 2006
  • #11
4MuscleMachines said:
FRP DOES NOT make headers for a 351W in a 65 Stang. I have already spoken to Stan several times since I repeatedly read this on the forum and he repeatedly told me NO. He said it's just too tight for him to make a good set and he rather not do it. He asked me if anybody has a set of his headers on a 65-66 Mustang with a 351W, to get the part number and call him back because he would like to know how they did it!

I called AccuFab and they told me almost the same thing but that their headers would hang low just like the Hooker Supercomps currently on my car. They are about 1.5-2" above ground level and my car is lowered about 2".
Click to expand...

OK, I will accept the fact that FRP may not make 351w swap headers since I haven't dealt with them. I would understand Stan's reasoning for not selling them because a sharp drop off is required to make a 1 3/4" header clear the shock tower. Some slight modification might be needed to the shock tower for clearance.

I DID PURCHASE 1 3/4" ACCUFABS for my 65' 393w swap. Below is a picture of the underside of my 393w 65'. I also am using 65' motor mounts that set the engine 1" lower than 66' and up. A coke can is 4 7/8" high and you can see that I have 1/2" more clearance than that. My Cal-tracs sit lower.




By the way, I also have the Shelby drop and standard 2bbl V8 coil springs. In the center is my big-arsed Lakewood scattershield which is slightly lower than the Accufab's.

I am running the stock 65' clutch linkage too.

The 1 3/4" Accufabs fit MUCH better than my previous Tubular Automotive 1 1/2" swap headers, which, even with smaller collectors, liked to brush the ground once in a while.
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
May 17, 2006
#12
  • May 17, 2006
  • #12
Glad you posted Dennis, I had been looking for a thread with your same pic posted but couldn't find it. Can you PM me your part number for those headers? I was about to order JBA's but I would prefer Accufab, the clearance just cannot get better than yours.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
May 17, 2006
#13
  • May 17, 2006
  • #13
4MuscleMachines said:
Glad you posted Dennis, I had been looking for a thread with your same pic posted but couldn't find it. Can you PM me your part number for those headers? I was about to order JBA's but I would prefer Accufab, the clearance just cannot get better than yours.
Click to expand...

Call Accufab and the owner, George will answer. Give him all the info on your car/engine/heads and he will let you know if he can fix you up. If he doesn't think he can meet your needs, he'll tell you just like Stan did. On a good day the dirty old man will talk your ear off.

Part # BT110, ’65-’73 351W, SPL, 1 3/4" tube, 3" collector, Long Tube $ 499.99 uncoated. Coated headers are available for an addition cost.

My heads have raised ports and he was able to accomodate them, plus clear my Scattershield (some very minor clearancing was needed near starter) and my stock clutch linkage. My 3" collectors are so tight to the floor pan that I just barely clear the transmission brace. George builds them without collectors and recommends that you purchase the slide in tapered ones, such as what Summit sells for about $22 (flowmaster brand.)

Build time will probably be 3-4 weeks (you might want to confirm this.)

For my installation, I did not tweak a single tube. I did relieve the shock tower in 2 places (passenger side) to ensure adequate engine movement. Installing the equalizer bar and a stock starter is a chore due to the tight clearances, but overall I am very pleased with the fit and the workmanship.
 

nillle

New Member
Apr 24, 2005
12
0
0
Sweden
May 18, 2006
#14
  • May 18, 2006
  • #14
Ok thanks alot. Now I won't make that mistake.

I have full length headers now, but the problem is that the clutch linkage doesn't clear. I would rather use shorty headers so I can bend the exhaust pipe to make the linkage clear.
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
May 18, 2006
#15
  • May 18, 2006
  • #15
I run the Headman headers. 1 3/4 Tubes. they are considered shorties. They have a 3" collectors. They fit fine in my 65. Hell I even put the engine back in with them on..
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
May 18, 2006
#16
  • May 18, 2006
  • #16
Stangninjak said:
I run the Headman headers. 1 3/4 Tubes. they are considered shorties. They have a 3" collectors. They fit fine in my 65. Hell I even put the engine back in with them on..
Click to expand...
Are they true shorties or midlength? What's the part#?
Thx.
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
May 18, 2006
#17
  • May 18, 2006
  • #17
Keep the info coming on 351W headers, guys. I am really trying to sort out how to do the headers in my 'vert. As a blown 408W, I'd like 1 7/8 or 2" headers...but will accept 1 3/4 if I have to. I have more room as the shock towers are gone. Also, we're going to push the engine as far down and back as we can, so headers may need a tad of cutting/welding...

So, any more options?
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
May 18, 2006
#18
  • May 18, 2006
  • #18
nillle, you wouldn't want to use the Hooker SuperComps on a 351W in a 65. Take a look at my clearance. Now you know why I am desperately looking for alternatives. My front tires pressure was low so the clearance should go up by ONE inch max.

Also, I believe the JBA are 1 5/8", I need at least 1 3/4. Anybody know of 1 7/8" that don't hang low?
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
May 18, 2006
#19
  • May 18, 2006
  • #19
Here is the coke can under the rocker panel lip so you can visualize the height of the car. I don't know how Dennis112 has so much clearance, mine is dropped 1.5"-2" with the shelby mod as well.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
May 19, 2006
#20
  • May 19, 2006
  • #20
4MuscleMachines said:
Here is the coke can under the rocker panel lip so you can visualize the height of the car. I don't know how Dennis112 has so much clearance, mine is dropped 1.5"-2" with the shelby mod as well.
Click to expand...

Glad the Coke Challenge is catching on!! .



WOW, that is low!!!!!

Part of the problem with your Hookers is that the collector appears to continue to shoot down at an angle. My accufabs are pretty much parallel to the ground--the coke cans are at the lowest spot.

My old TA headers collectors were maybe 2 1/2-3" from the ground. I was able to make that combination driveable by cutting off the collector flange and adding a piece of straight pipe instead (solid weld.) It wasn't real friendly to remove, but it did help driveablility. I was still very afraid of railroad crossings though . . . .

As seen in my pic, I do not have a collector ring now, either --I installed a Flowmaster ball and socket instead.



My rocker clearance is higher than yours. My exhaust is barely lower than the subframe connectors. During my Shelby drop I only did the standard 1" mod. Supposedly that translates to about 1/2" body drop. I am using stock V8 springs in the front. I don't know how it affects the front of the car, but I also run a 5 leaf rear spring.

My car is going in for a safety inspection this morning. I'll try to post some more pics tonight. It will give me a chance to try out my new camera.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
208
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
292
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
545
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?