• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

5.0 mag: BBK longtubes make LESS power than shorties

  • Thread starter Thread starter N8Miller
  • Start date Start date Mar 3, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Mar 3, 2004
#1
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #1
i just got the new 5.0 mag and on the cover i was happy to see that they were going a 347 BBK header dyno shootout. they did equal shorties, unequal shorties, 1 5/8 long tubes and 1 3/4 long tubes (which i just bought today).
now, in the dyno, the winner was the unequal shorties at 410 horses. now, everyone says that long tubes are the only way to go with a decent motor buildup. but, the 1 5/8 long tubes only made 404 hp and the 1 3/4s were at 408 hp.
am i missing something? does BBK have a surplus of shorties they need to get rid of? maybe hit up 5.0 with like $500k to imbelish the #s a bit

what do you guys think? its the may edition btw and i got it today.
 
H

Hunter26

Founding Member
May 2, 2002
280
0
0
Charleston, SC
Mar 3, 2004
#2
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #2
I haven't gotten my 5.0 mag yet, sounds interesting. One thing though, it's only four horsepower, hardly something you would notice. You could gain or lose four horsepower from the temperature outside and many other things.
 

MustangGlx

New Member
Apr 2, 2003
147
0
0
Connecticut
Mar 3, 2004
#3
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #3
Thats surprising, i was always under the impression that long tubes were the way to go, hmm maybe bbk did pay off 5.0,i dunno
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Mar 3, 2004
#4
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #4
haha, i think thats great...ive got a set of unequal shorties on my car...just wish my car made 410 hp
 

GMstomper

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
71
0
0
Blackwood, NJ
Mar 3, 2004
#5
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #5
Something smells a lil fishy...maybe they shoved a potatoe in one of the tailpipes for the other pulls
 

RyanSG

Founding Member
Oct 24, 2002
286
0
17
Allentown, Pa
Mar 3, 2004
#6
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #6
just got the mag day also. my uncle had said about the difference between long and short tube headers. That long tubes really don't give you much if any more power if your exhaust is setup right (equal length does help, also tuned headers but only marginal). I think the muffler and routing etc is where more atention should be paid. if you rally think about it, all longtubes are is an extention of the header.. how can that be much different from short tubes?? look close, same thing just extended, and about 2x more cost wise, add a little hype to it and whala! money maker!! (my opinion though, mighit be wrog but at least it'll make ya think lol)
 
L

leakyfaucet

Member
Dec 19, 2003
273
0
16
North Carolina
Mar 3, 2004
#7
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #7
I thought longtubes made more power do to something with soundwaves bouncing around. Just wait for a header expert to set you all straight.
 

MustangMulch

New Member
Mar 27, 2003
303
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Mar 3, 2004
#8
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #8
Long tube headers have more velocity on the air, because it has more space to push and pull the air. This means better airflow, and more power. At least thats how i understand it.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Mar 3, 2004
#9
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #9
how did the bbk equal length shorties do?
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Mar 3, 2004
#10
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #10
peak numbers are not everything, what did the curves look like?

its all about the area under the curve.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Mar 3, 2004
#11
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #11
IndyBlk5.0 said:
how did the bbk equal length shorties do?
Click to expand...
406 hp.

as for the curve: long tubes has the EL shorites from 3-4k....then it was almost dead even after that.
 
9

90stangLX302

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
76
0
0
Good ol' Bellaire Ohio
Mar 3, 2004
#12
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #12
The soundwaves in the long tubes will reach the 3rd or 4th harmonic which is 3 or 4 times the wavelength of the fundamental frequency,... the fundamental frequency in the open tubes is 1/4 the wavelength. Now depending on the wavelength and how long the tube is, if the length of the tube is the proper length to reace that waves harmonic,... then the sound will increase directly proportional with it,.... this has nothing to do with the flow of the air. Its the sound only. Thats all the help my degree in acoustic engineering will help
 

axeman

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2001
1,348
0
36
Elizabethtown, PA
Mar 3, 2004
#13
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #13
funny that majority of nmra racers use long tubes. i guess they wasted their money and countless hours of dyno tuning.
 

RyanSG

Founding Member
Oct 24, 2002
286
0
17
Allentown, Pa
Mar 3, 2004
#14
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #14
i think the reason they use long tubes could also be the place the exhaust under the car without haveing to add other exhaust peices. i doubt anyone in there right mind would run shorties with notuing else the exhaustr woudl go right into the engine bay. plus like our accustic engeneer said they sound better. when your talking 3-4 hp, and you have 400, does it really matter otern then the sound, prob not.. maybe if we had an import, but then again they never sound like a v8!
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
Mar 3, 2004
#15
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #15
I'd still rather have long tubes.
 
M

motrV8ed

New Member
Dec 8, 2001
31
0
0
Hampton, VA
Mar 3, 2004
#16
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #16
From what I always understood is that longtubes are better at exhaust scavenging...and tend to create more torque than the shorties. But how many engines did they test the headers on? Who's to say that the longtubes won't outperform the shorties on a higher hp or more radical engine!?
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Mar 3, 2004
#17
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #17
I don't like the 5.0 mag much anymore. They are always coming out with this junk. Remember the one buildup they did comparing a supercharged stock 5.0 to a H/C/I 5.0 setup. First of all they did everything back a$$wards building it the oppisite of how everyone else does it, then added the 70mm tb and lost power after the intake and heads, what a bunch of BS. After all was said and done, they put the S trim on the Edelbrock H/C/I combo and only pulled the low-mid 300hp numbers, a FTI combo makes more completley N/A.
 

onefaststang

Kingpin
Founding Member
Jan 1, 1999
9,049
4
79
Elmira NY
Mar 4, 2004
#18
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #18
axeman said:
funny that majority of nmra racers use long tubes. i guess they wasted their money and countless hours of dyno tuning.
Click to expand...
I went back to shorties after using longtubes. A couple different brands of LT's also. I'm very happy with my shorties. Made plenty of power with them.
 

Blue89gt

Founding Member
Jan 24, 2002
404
0
0
Denver Colorado
Mar 4, 2004
#19
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #19
likw the man said, all the peak power in the world if you dont have the curve to support it, the car is going to be no fun to drive... my LT's were good for 16hp over mac shories.
 
1

1hot5.0

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,615
0
0
Surprise, Arizona
Mar 4, 2004
#20
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #20
Yea, I was always under the impression that longtubes made more power than shorties. Im guessing the way the car was tuned had something to do with it... If it wasn't for emissions testing and ease of installation, I would have gone with longtubes in a heart beat.

Blue89GT, did you gain mph after you installed longtubes?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
133
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?