• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

5.0 mag: BBK longtubes make LESS power than shorties

  • Thread starter Thread starter N8Miller
  • Start date Start date Mar 3, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Apr 22, 2004
#41
  • Apr 22, 2004
  • #41
CHEESE and Rice, TOM!! Your rocking....( and scarey..LOL)

Thumper
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Apr 22, 2004
#42
  • Apr 22, 2004
  • #42
To kill the drone in a dual exhaust system, you can play with the length of one of the tubes to put the exhaust pulses 180 degrees out of phase with each other. Then they effectively cancel each other out. However, it's probably easier said than done, considering how little space there is between the rear of the cat converter and the bend in the exhaust pipe where it goes over the rear axle.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Apr 22, 2004
#43
  • Apr 22, 2004
  • #43
GMstomper said:
If you have a mostly stock engine accept for simple bolt-ons you wont see the bennefit of LT's. The only way you will see big gains if you get the fuel curve remaped or you have a power adder. A mostly stock N/A car simple isnt flowing that much air unless its properly tuned. Otherwise there is no sense getting away from shorties. Which I'm gonna go back to or switch to BBK LT's....havent decided yet.
Click to expand...

I think it is all a give and take. Some cars love them for some reason, some dont. My personal experience was this...

Shorties (Mac 1 5/8) H-pipe with cats (Mac 2 1/2) and the car ran a best of 13.89 @ 98.

Long Tubes (Mac 1 5/8) Prochamber (Mac 2 1/2) and pulleys, and the car ran a best of 13.05 @ 103.

I read the articles and take some bits of info, but I think every car is going to react differently for different reasons! My mild bolt on car LOVED the Long Tubes and prochamber, while some dont see any gains at all!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
147
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
923
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?