• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

54cc + flattops = ? compression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steel1212
  • Start date Start date Jul 5, 2005
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jul 5, 2005
#1
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #1
I'm looking a set of rebuilt heads and they have 54cc chambers. I was wondering with my flattops what the compression would be.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 5, 2005
#2
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #2
the factory rates this combo at 10:1 compression. i think it comes out to more like 9.6:1 in actual fact(it has been awhile since i ran the numbers through a compression ratio calculator, and it also depends on how far down the hole the pistons are).
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Jul 5, 2005
#3
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #3
Static compression is 10.6:1. This is considering .060 overbore and +0cc for flat tops. Dynamic compression will vary based on your cam specifics but it should be close to ~10.0:1.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jul 5, 2005
#4
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #4
what about head gasket compressed volume and head gasket thickness?

Cylinder Diameter (inches) 4.060
Stroke Length (inches) 3.00 (302)
Number of cylinders 8
Chamber in cc's 58cc head plus 6.78 cc compressed volume on the gasket
Piston flat tops so 0
Gasket Thickness in inches 0.32

Comes out to 9.9
Does this sound about right?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 5, 2005
#5
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #5
most head gaskets for the small block ford are between .043 and .058 in thickness, and the piston is usually between .002 and .010 down the hole. that is why i say more like 9.6:1 is closer to accurate.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jul 5, 2005
#6
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #6
Yeah, but when I try to use the calculator do you factor in the compressed volume or not?
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jul 5, 2005
#7
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #7
Most flat top pistons have valve reliefs of 4-6cc. If we assume 5cc, .040" compressed head gasket volume, .005" in the hole, and 54cc chambers, 4.060 bore, I get 10.1:1 static compression.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jul 5, 2005
#8
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #8
How are you getting 10.1 to 1 when your adding 6cc more and useing a thicker gasket than I did in the calculator and I only get 9.9 without adding 6ccs and a thinner gasket.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jul 5, 2005
#9
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #9
Sorry:
5cc valve relief
.005" in the hole
.040" gasket thickness
54cc heads
4.060" bore
3.00" stroke
10.09:1 static compression

I built a speadsheet. It even accounts for piston to wall clearance at the top. I trust it. You don't have to.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Jul 5, 2005
#10
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #10
I'm not saying I don't trust it I'm just trying to figure things out. If I don't understand them then I don't know how to do it and it buggs me. I don't like asking questions I want to be able to figure it out by myself but some times you have to lol.

Could you email me a copy of that spreedsheet?
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jul 6, 2005
#11
  • Jul 6, 2005
  • #11
PM me your e-mail address and I'll send it.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 6, 2005
#12
  • Jul 6, 2005
  • #12
Depends also on the pin height of the pistons used. Most are either 1.585 or 1.605, a few are 1.610. The 1.585's will give around 9 to 1, the other two will get it to 10.0 to 10.5 to 1
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jul 6, 2005
#13
  • Jul 6, 2005
  • #13
Yeah, you have to know the C-H and deck height in order to estimate the piston-to-deck height, which plays a big role in CR. I ran across C-Hs of 1.165-1.175 for the 331. I guess the same must be true of stockers in order to accommodate different deck heights (from decking duing block machining). Good point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Quad shocks
  • keel
  • May 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 2, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Are These rings OK?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Sep 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
294
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 26, 2026
PonyGTrider
3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
348
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
533
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Salvage/rebuilt title question
  • djj62478
  • Oct 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
151
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 2, 2026
DadLife0724
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?