60 Foot Times

[Stan Weiss]

"Just get that 60 foot times down"

I see this all the time when someone posts time for a stock or almost stock car running on stock tires and they are running 2.0 and 2.1 60 foot times.

So what is a GOOD 60 foot time for a stock or almost stock car running on stock tires?

 

[EPIK]

"Just get that 60 foot times down"

I see this all the time when someone posts time for a stock or almost stock car running on stock tires and they are running 2.0 and 2.1 60 foot times.

So what is a GOOD 60 foot time for a stock or almost stock car running on stock tires?

1.9- 2.0 is good for stock tires IMO....Its pretty hard to get lower than that on street tires, but I think a 1.8 is possible??

 

[98COBRA281]

i got a 2.9 on street tires

 

[CobraRed_96_GT]

2.0-2.1 is pretty good for a GT with stock trim. A stock car is vague - because STi's/Z06's cuz much lower times in stock trim. Basically the goal is to always be under 2.0 for modded mustang's at the track

 

[Stan Weiss]

OK to be exact I have a '00 GT 5 speed and ran a best 60 foot of 2.056 with a 1/4 time of 14.122. My best 1/4 time of 14.097 had a 60 foot time of 2.115. I bought the car used with 53k mile. The only mods I have done is a K&N drop in air filter and a PRO 5.0 shifter. The car had Toya 245-45-17 tires when I get it.

 

[Stan Weiss]

1.9- 2.0 is good for stock tires IMO....Its pretty hard to get lower than that on street tires, but I think a 1.8 is possible??

Is this with stock 3.27:1 gears?

 

[BennyBlown2v]

I cut 1.9's on my autox/street setup with 245 street tires I cut a 1.78 on 275/17 MT et street radials on the same suspension setup. If you have power it's easier to get a low 60' time, if you know how to drive, but if your car is slow it's easier to control the wheel spin and cut a decent time.

 

[d98gt]

but was your car stock when you cut those 1.9s on street tires?

Stock being no exhaust or any other mods.

 

[EPIK]

Is this with stock 3.27:1 gears?

Im sure its not out of the question.... I could imagine it would be harder to get a good 60ft on stock tires with 3.73's or 4.10's than it would with 3.27's because the tires would break loose easier.... Ive only raced at the track on 1 occasion & my 60ft was a 2.2 on street tires, but I have watched & been around it several times, so i know what a good 60ft for a Mustang is....

 

[04GTMustang]

1.9- 2.0 is good for stock tires IMO....Its pretty hard to get lower than that on street tires, but I think a 1.8 is possible??

i cut a 1.85 on 245 street tires. but my clutch is now done after that. i went to the track yesterday and now my clutch is really slipping let it out all the way and it slips for a bit then grabs. im at 66k on the stock clutch. it def is possible but you really gotta be working that clutch hard.

 

[AntiRice98]

Damn, I can't get any better then 1.9's with my 275 MT et streets...My track must suck

 

[BurningRubber]

I cut a 2.16 on 315 Sumitumo's, with 4.10's.

On a mostly stock car I would personally say that it will be easier to cut a better 60' with 3.27's than a numerically higher gear on street tires.

4.10's are aweful trying to get off the line without drag radials. Depends on track prep too though.

 

[BennyBlown2v]

but was your car stock when you cut those 1.9s on street tires?

Stock being no exhaust or any other mods.

no - but supsension wise it was worse for stock with weight transfer...my car is setup not to dive, not to transfer weight to the rear

 

[Griffin Trott]

I'm getting 1.9 sec 60ft times in my 2016 Ecoboost with stock Pirellis. No tune either.