• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

'69 block imcompatible with aluminium heads???!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter stock50LX
  • Start date Start date Dec 30, 2003

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
Dec 30, 2003
#1
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #1
I was just told by a Summit salesman, who bothered to read the footnotes regarding Edelbrock heads, that my '69 351 block would need "steam holes" drilled to be compatible with the heads. Since he works on commission and he wants to sell the heads, his statement is credible. Does anyone have experience with this. It was the same with the TFS heads too.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Dec 30, 2003
#2
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #2
 

Ranchero5.0

The Voice of Reason
Jan 1, 1999
5,306
0
76
Hagerstown MD
Dec 31, 2003
#3
  • Dec 31, 2003
  • #3
Yep, the steamports changed over the years. It's better to drill a 1/8" hole in the heads to match your block. Just use the heads gasket as a guide and be done with it. I did the block last time and one of the bits tracked off a little in spite of being center punched. Aluminum is softer and easier to drill.

Jamie
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
Dec 31, 2003
#4
  • Dec 31, 2003
  • #4
Ranchero5.0 said:
Yep, the steamports changed over the years. It's better to drill a 1/8" hole in the heads to match your block. Just use the heads gasket as a guide and be done with it. I did the block last time and one of the bits tracked off a little in spite of being center punched. Aluminum is softer and easier to drill.

Jamie
Click to expand...

I don't have enough in the block, the head has more. Where did you drill them in your block? -just a half inch from the cylinder hole at the 1:00 o'clock position when looking down at the #8 cylinder? That seems to be the hole I am missing.
 

PURESTREET5006

New Member
Apr 1, 2003
349
0
0
In the tech line for tear down"AGAIN"
Jan 2, 2004
#5
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #5
My block is from 1969 302 with a .060 over bore and i have lite weight heads on my car.
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Jan 3, 2004
#6
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #6
would NOT having that hole cause overheating?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
788
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
86 Capri Cylinder Head Selection
  • ClevelandTim
  • Aug 6, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 7, 2018
mikestang63
Gettin' Foxy In Nebraska
  • RATX5
  • Nov 7, 2016
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Nov 9, 2016
Davedacarpainter
Engine Anyone Here Running Frpp "boss" Head Gasket M-6051-cp331 In A Production 5.0l?
  • Gearbanger 101
  • May 31, 2014
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 4, 2014
Gearbanger 101
The Towering Inferno (the 1970 Mach 1 Version)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2016
smokin joe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?