• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

73mm MAF vs 76mm MAF for TFSsetup

  • Thread starter Thread starter JMD Engineering
  • Start date Start date Nov 27, 2005
J

JMD Engineering

New Member
Dec 8, 2004
102
0
0
Northern VA
Nov 27, 2005
#1
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #1
So i FINALLY got my Trick Flow StreetHeat Engine kit in. Im only 17, so funds arent ample enough to buy the other parts (TB/MAF/Injectors etc.). This leaves me to slowly piece it all together, paycheck to paycheck. I so far have the 70mm Accufab TB, 24# FMS inject, and BBK CAI. Im now looking to purchase a new MAF.

The opening to the TFS intake is 75mm, and my questions are:
- is C&L a product as for as MAF's go ?
- the options for the C&L are 73mm and 76mm; is 73mm too small that it would kill power? and is 76mm too big as to where id need to port the intake (which, i dont want to do- considering the funds) ?
- or should i breakdown and get a ProProducts 75mm (ive heard nothing but bad things about them.. hence the reason im hesitating) ?

people are idiots around here. so i dont trust their word. hopefully you guys can help. thanks :]
 

88_GT_5_oh

Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan
Jul 4, 2004
1
0
1
WPG/MB/CA
Nov 27, 2005
#2
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #2
i have a 76mm c&l mass air meter for my combo (tw heads, cam and track heat intake) no complaints at all. i went with the bigger one cause it was $20 more at the time and it lets me grow

as long as the mass air meter isn't smaller than the TB your not gonna kill performance at all
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Nov 27, 2005
#3
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #3
I had a 73mm C&L meter and couldn't get my setup to run right.I kicked myself in the butt for taking a short cut to save a few bucks.I dug a little deeper in my pocket and switched to the Pro M 75mm (or Pro. Products or whatever they are called now).It works much better for me.I hadn't heard a negative comment about them, only recommendations that I ignored.The diameter wasn't an issue, none of these would hold you back power wise.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,027
1,618
194
NJ
Nov 27, 2005
#4
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #4
Read the first line in Topdowns post, take his word for it.

Buy an 80mm pro m and be done with it. If budget doesn't allow just get the 75mm bullet.
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
Nov 27, 2005
#5
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #5
I did a lot of searching about the two and alot of people couldnt get their stangs running right with the C&L. and there was nothing but good stuff about Pro-M or whoever owns them now. and plus Pro-m's look Alot better instead of the rough looking cast aluminum. I have the Pro-m 75mm bullit and matches awesome with my chrome tubing on my Mac fenderwell intake. Just save up the extra for the Pro-M, you wont regret it
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Nov 27, 2005
#6
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #6
pro flow is easier to dyno tune. c&l is impossible to tune. alot of tunners say thats the only way to go.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,027
1,618
194
NJ
Nov 27, 2005
#7
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #7
Where the hell were you guys when everyone was argueing with me over C&L a month back or so?? LOL. I could of used some back up.
I've seen alot of screwed up C&L cars.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Nov 27, 2005
#8
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #8
2000xp8 said:
Where the hell were you guys when everyone was argueing with me over C&L a month back or so?? LOL. I could of used some back up.
I've seen alot of screwed up C&L cars.
Click to expand...


i might have been one of them look in my sig. after i went to the h/c swap i heard from mostly tuners pro flows have the flow sheets which makes it easier to tune. btw, i need to update the sig. sold it for 185 on ebay. im using the stock air box with a k&n and stock maf now. im sure going to that from the c&l kit wont change any track times .
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Nov 27, 2005
#9
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #9
C&L works fine for a stock h/c car. after that, time to upgrade
 
J

JMD Engineering

New Member
Dec 8, 2004
102
0
0
Northern VA
Nov 27, 2005
#10
  • Nov 27, 2005
  • #10
thanks guys. i'll be looking into Pro-M :]

should have the combo up and running by january.. ill keep everyone posted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
487
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
H
Fox fuel pump upgrades
  • hawkinsdrag
  • Aug 17, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2023
Noobz347
N
Engine 1994 Mustang GT AODE puzzling issues
  • noah5slow
  • Oct 22, 2022
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Oct 29, 2022
noah5slow
N
Ford MAF w/C&L 76mm housing
  • Rxbandits
  • Jan 8, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 23, 2020
Mstng93SSP
Engine Cold air intake help needed.
  • Ron90LX
  • Aug 4, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 10, 2019
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?