• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

75mm pro-m maf worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91LX_5L
  • Start date Start date Nov 7, 2004

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Nov 7, 2004
#1
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #1
worth it over stock? I can get one used for $125 shipped. I have H/C/I 70mm bbk throttle body, think that 75mm is big enough for the MAF?

 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Nov 7, 2004
#2
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #2
91LX_5L said:
worth it over stock? I can get one used for $125 shipped. I have H/C/I 70mm bbk throttle body, think that 75mm is big enough for the MAF?

Click to expand...

For about 100$ more, you could have a REALLY good meter with a big@ss air filter included in the deal. The Pro-M 80mm. I've never heard anyone complain about it compared to the 75mm which is very picky on the 94-95 somehow.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 7, 2004
#3
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #3
I have a 75mm Pro-M on my car and it runs strong...getting track numbers this coming weekend...

Make sure their calibrated for your injectors...
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Nov 7, 2004
#4
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #4
yeah it is calibrated for my injectors, have a link to the 80mm? you talking about C&L?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 7, 2004
#5
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #5
91LX_5L said:
worth it over stock? I can get one used for $125 shipped. I have H/C/I 70mm bbk throttle body, think that 75mm is big enough for the MAF?

Click to expand...

IMHO the issue on the Bullet maf is not if it is big enough to flow the amount of air that your combo requires.

The electronics are better on the 77 & 80 ProM maf than the Bullet. A search will turn up a good bit about these meters.

This is not to say you will have probs with the Bullet cause many use them and have no complaints but some have had issues with them.

Later
Grady
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
Nov 7, 2004
#6
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #6
I'm personally a big fan of the Pro M 77mm. it cost a bit more though. I ordered my 92mm with filter from CoolBlue Performance and got a good deal. $399 shipped Many places wanted 500+ for it. http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?t=567178 Email/call Anthony direct for the best prices if you were in the market to buy new.

On a side note my buddy uses a 75mm bullit on his car and knocks down 500 rwhp with perfect drivability. Not to say he would or wouldn't make more with a better meter but the 75mm is working nicely.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 7, 2004
#7
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #7
Yeah mine is the Bullet (75mm) and I drive my car everyday if that tells you about the driveability...

I believe Killercanary uses a Bullet also right?
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Nov 8, 2004
#8
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #8
okay, well i think I might try it. do you think I'd benifit from a maf on my car?
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Nov 8, 2004
#9
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #9
Just eliminate the possibility of being someone who winds up having trouble with the 75 and get the 77. Thats what I did, should be here any day. After researching it on here there were more complaints than praises for the 75.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Nov 8, 2004
#10
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #10
Yea, I have the 80mm and there was a SOTP gain with my h/c/i Car.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 8, 2004
#11
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #11
Nik_95Cobra said:
After researching it on here there were more complaints than praises for the 75.
Click to expand...

I doubt that...If you look at the users of the Pro-M 75mm and not the people that "heard" it was bad...sometimes it better to experience the good then hear about the bad
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 8, 2004
#12
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #12
If you decide to move up to the 77 or 80 ProM save yourself some money and get the 80 cause the electronics are the same on both mafs.

The 80 cost less cause it is plastic and the 77 is machined from aluminum.

Another thing you might want is the shorty version so you can stick it in your fender with a home made cai.

Later
Grady
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Nov 8, 2004
#13
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #13
doubt that...If you look at the users of the Pro-M 75mm and not the people that "heard" it was bad...sometimes it better to experience the good then hear about the bad
Click to expand...

Do a search...Didn't forego the 75 without reason.

Edit: There were also people who switched from one to the other. Was sharing my experience so no need to discredit the post. Also never said it was guaranteed not to work...There's of course sevral guys on here who didn't have a problem.
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
Gilbert,AZ
Nov 8, 2004
#14
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #14
I have the 75 on my car. Never had any problems. I picked up a little hp/tq. That's a good deal you got there. If you don't find anything else better I would stick with that.

Dustin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Pro-M 75MM Bullet Flow Sheet - Is this calibrated for 36 # injectors?
  • dan50
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
304
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jan 11, 2026
dan50
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
259
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
238
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
565
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
775
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?