• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

85.5 svo vs a 83 gt

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91redlxhatch
  • Start date Start date Jul 13, 2004

91redlxhatch

New Member
Aug 30, 2003
54
0
0
North carolina
Jul 13, 2004
#1
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #1
what car do u think would win in a race..i was just wondering a 85.5 svo or a 83gt
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 13, 2004
#2
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #2
stock for stock the SVO would kill it....as long as the intercooler hose doesn't come off.
 

MSM0075

Member
May 13, 2003
741
0
16
Central Jersey
Jul 13, 2004
#3
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #3
yeah my turbo car would tool my 5.0
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Jul 13, 2004
#4
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #4
You have to go with the 85.5 SVO. 302's didn't have nearly as much pop back in 83 as they did in the 87-93 and beyond era's.

1983 5.0 302 V8 - Rated at 175hp
1985.5 SVO 2.3T - Rated at 205hp

There's a couple numbers for ya to chew on.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 13, 2004
#5
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #5
if its an 85.5 comp prep it should run with 87-93 5.0 too.
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Jul 13, 2004
#6
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #6
351wcoupe said:
if its an 85.5 comp prep it should run with 87-93 5.0 too.
Click to expand...

Just want you to know, comp prep did not have more power or performance than a regular svo, or always a weight advantage after it's all said and done. Basically some just ended up as SVO's without a wing.

And worse, when you actually look at build sheets (which I haven't done - but read about and discussed at the reunion) there's no real law that was followed. A sheet could show the comp prep package, but a stereo and electric windows ordered, a/c, or even a dealer installed sun roof as a member owns one.

My SVO is nearly a comp prep now. Front speakers don't work, electric doorlock doesn't work on the passenger side, a/c yanked. Everytime I work on something, I remove any of the sound deadening material. Plus it has cool mods!
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 13, 2004
#7
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #7
i would pick the svo over the 5.0, altho the 5.0 would have a lot more low end tq. When the turbo kicks in, its out of there.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 13, 2004
#8
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #8
oh, i meant the 83 5.0, not the 87+ , 87-93 would rape one.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 13, 2004
#9
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #9
I yeah know, I was just thinking of a lightened 85.5. Thats interesting I didn't know they could be ordered with the options. Now I wonder if I've passed one up.

It still should run/outrun though. My 84 will run with the basically stock 5.0s in luray from a dead stop right up until the end of 3rd when the clutch starts howling.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 13, 2004
#10
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #10
super302 said:
oh, i meant the 83 5.0, not the 87+ , 87-93 would rape one.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't go that far...stock for stock there would be no raping going on...
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Jul 13, 2004
#11
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #11
140cilx said:
My SVO is nearly a comp prep now. Plus it has cool mods!
Click to expand...
Like losing to an 88 LX.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 13, 2004
#12
  • Jul 13, 2004
  • #12
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Jul 14, 2004
#13
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #13
Crovax said:
Like losing to an 88 LX.
Click to expand...

I'M GLAD YOU BEAT ME THAT ONE TIME ENJOY IT FOREVER AND REMIND ME CONSTANTLY!!!
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 14, 2004
#14
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #14
hey thats needed. If you're anything like me...If I get beat(especially by someone like cro I turn into a fierce competitor.) All in fun of course.
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Jul 14, 2004
#15
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #15
True dat. I'm not real competitive, I don't care enough, that boy though ... he's competitive!
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 14, 2004
#16
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #16
I'll keep that in mind if we visit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
246
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
T
New here, just saying hi.
  • Tank Mechanic
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
163
The Welcome Wagon Nov 2, 2025
nickyb
M
83 GT converitble?
  • myoldstang
  • May 5, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
203
The Welcome Wagon May 6, 2025
Noobz347
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
246
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
332
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?