• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

86vs87-93 lower intake...any difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allforspeed
  • Start date Start date Aug 17, 2005
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
Aug 17, 2005
#1
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #1
i just got a free 1986 5.0 lower intake and am wondering if it is worth porting or are the ports smaller than the 87-93 intake manifolds that i have on my GT right now??
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Aug 17, 2005
#2
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #2
If you're going to have it ported then it doesn't really matter. LOL

On another note. I believe that the lowers are the same.
 
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
Aug 17, 2005
#3
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #3
cool thanks! i was just wondering if the ports were smaller cause if they are i would assume the wall thickness of the ports are thinner thereby limiting the amount i could port out due to the less total mass

so if they are the same than out comes the grinder and out comes the welder, and here comes my super-sik home ported magic intake...

thanks draggar!!! you have totally helped me out again and again, i dont know what my car would be without this place


any confirmation from anyone else too before i grind a possibly useless intake??
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,170
17,870
224
Massachusetts
Aug 17, 2005
#4
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #4
Lowers are the same...it's the uppers that differ
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Aug 17, 2005
#5
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #5
Allforspeed said:
any confirmation from anyone else too before i grind a possibly useless intake??
Click to expand...

I'd have to say that H.O. intakes suck and arent worth porting... but they might make a good boat anchor in their second life
 
D

Dangerfield23

New Member
Aug 14, 2005
18
0
0
El Dorado, Arkansas
Aug 17, 2005
#6
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #6
I ran an '86 intake before I switched to the Explorer intake, and I couldn't see any difference in the '86 and a '90 I have from another vehicle.
 
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
Aug 17, 2005
#7
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #7
cool, thanks guys!!! i know the HO intake sucks, but some people have had great success porting them so i like stock and smog legal so thats what i'm going to do, also its free
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 18, 2005
#8
  • Aug 18, 2005
  • #8
vikingpower said:
I'd have to say that H.O. intakes suck and arent worth porting... but they might make a good boat anchor in their second life
Click to expand...

If 260RWHP and 12.7@107mph suck, then your right.










But I think your wrong!
 
A

Allforspeed

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
264
0
0
Aug 19, 2005
#9
  • Aug 19, 2005
  • #9
i agree! tmoss was actually the guy i was refering to when talking about people making beasts with the stock intake!

tmoss, your the lower intake porting yoda: are the 86 lowers the same as the 87-93??? they look identical to my untrained eye but maybe they are thinner or thicker in critical areas??
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 19, 2005
#10
  • Aug 19, 2005
  • #10
Yes, they are the same except for casting differences in the three suppliers I know of - the uppers differ a little with the 86 intake having slightly smaller runners in the upper intake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Wednesday at 10:54 PM
Noobz347
Engine Cleaning Intake valves with lower intake off
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
345
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2026
limp
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
316
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
110
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
601
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?