• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

89 5.0 versus, cobra, 99, ls-1 lt-1 c-4

  • Thread starter Thread starter revedup
  • Start date Start date Feb 7, 2007

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 7, 2007
#1
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #1
Guys help got 217,000 miles never apart 89 5.0
i want better handling more power.
Need soon to decide to restore , rebuild upgrade
or to grab one of the aformentioned rides
Dudes any of you with any experience with any of those cars listed compared to this 5.0 of mine
Id like your input please
mines bone stock
Im also concerned with ease of maintenace as i do my own work or try to!
Are the cars better in handling power cornering ease of repair????
Ect???
Id like sugestions .
i feel my 5.0 is on its last leg even though it stil feels strong.
I will have to pass cali snmog in Dec.
if it fails ???????????
Worth all the upgrading restoring ect???
Or???????
thanx for any experience and or sugestions and contributions!!!

 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Feb 7, 2007
#2
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #2
The ls-1, lt-1, and c-4's will be faster, and much better handling, but are a bitch to work on. That is just about the only drawback to them, and is the reason I don't have one. How is the body on your car? Is it just mechanical issues that worry you? Or does the car need to be gone through completely?
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
4
36
NJ
Feb 7, 2007
#3
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #3
High mileage motors are usually nothing to worry about as long as you dont beat the hell out of it. My old motor which had 214000 ran real strong and still does in my friends 91 GT. You could put a H/C/I and have a nice fast reliable fox body.
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 7, 2007
#4
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #4
5.0 Mechanical rest good


I,d say the body int paint are good
Id say even mechically good
even though it has 217,000 miles
still runs good
Im looking at either upgrading eventually with a rebuilt motor
I want to upgrade handling some
Heater cores out 2nd one.
Im thinking maybe just sell and buy a cobra or 99 gt maybe those ar easier to work on than the gm cars?
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 7, 2007
#5
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #5
MAC'n89Blckstng said:
High mileage motors are usually nothing to worry about as long as you dont beat the hell out of it. My old motor which had 214000 ran real strong and still does in my friends 91 GT. You could put a H/C/I and have a nice fast reliable fox body.
Click to expand...

H/C/I??????
 
A

aNotchAbove

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
75
0
0
Feb 7, 2007
#6
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #6
Heads/Cam/Intake
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 7, 2007
#7
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #7
96-98Cobras, 99gt,s or 96-98 gt,s

sangsters
Im thinking 5.0,s are the easiest to work on compared to the aformentioned?????
Whats your reaction???????
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 7, 2007
#8
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #8
Heads cam intake on a 217,000 mile motor????????
What about passing smog im in Cali????
details sugestions ect on head cam intake ????
 

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Feb 7, 2007
#9
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #9
What you think
A cobra will out handle and out accelerate a 5.0 right
I mean if its even possible to be competitive with one a whole lot of work time and money must be spent right?
Even then??????
 
N

niklid05

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
140
0
0
Kutztown PA 19530
Feb 7, 2007
#10
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #10
revedup said:

I,d say the body int paint are good
Id say even mechically good
even though it has 217,000 miles
still runs good
Im looking at either upgrading eventually with a rebuilt motor
I want to upgrade handling some
Heater cores out 2nd one.
Im thinking maybe just sell and buy a cobra or 99 gt maybe those ar easier to work on than the gm cars?
Click to expand...


cars last as long as you let them.


sangsters
Im thinking 5.0,s are the easiest to work on compared to the aformentioned?????
Whats your reaction???????
Click to expand...

more than likely beings you have to practically drop the motor out of an lt/s1 motor to change the sparkplugs.

Heads cam intake on a 217,000 mile motor????????
What about passing smog im in Cali????
details sugestions ect on head cam intake ????
Click to expand...

check out the trick flow top end kit....

What you think
A cobra will out handle and out accelerate a 5.0 right
I mean if its even possible to be competitive with one a whole lot of work time and money must be spent right?
Even then??????
Click to expand...

uh what? im assuming your asking if a 5.0 fox can run with a cobra.... It can with some money invested into it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2015 Ford Mustang Official Intel
  • MRaburn
  • Dec 5, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Dec 5, 2013
MRaburn
M90 root blower how to info
  • 1987LXragtop
  • Jan 7, 2011
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
8K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2011
1987LXragtop
  • Locked
5.0 versus 99GT up, Which is better????
  • revedup
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2007
Mike97gt
M
2011 V6 stang official release
  • master_V12
  • Nov 29, 2009
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
12K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Dec 12, 2009
SS02
S
F
What engine to buy?? suggestions/advice?
  • Fatbobsie
  • Jun 5, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
989
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2007
Fatbobsie
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?