90mm LMAF or AEM 3.5 Bar MAP sensor

toyman · May 21, 2008

I'm currently doing a engine build to better support the KB 2.1 L

I was leaning towards the MAP as I live in an area where the elevation is about 1500 feet and during the summer often drive where the elevation ranges from sea level to 5600+ feet. It initially just seemed more logical to work with manifold pressures vs air flows given these elevation extremes. Now I'm not so sure.

The EMU will be an AEM-EMS 30-1401.

Richard

Black95GTS · May 22, 2008

toyman said:
I'm currently doing a engine build to better support the KB 2.1 L

I was leaning towards the MAP as I live in an area where the elevation is about 1500 feet and during the summer often drive where the elevation ranges from sea level to 5600+ feet. It initially just seemed more logical to work with manifold pressures vs air flows given these elevation extremes. Now I'm not so sure.

The EMU will be an AEM-EMS 30-1401.

Richard

I like the MAP for your application. This is more of a judgement call to be honest. Both systems have their merits, but I think people disregard the MAP because its known as old technology. I think this is a silly way to look at it. I'd do some research and see what other people with combo's similar to your own are running and ask them directly. KillerCanary is running a 331 with a turbo, with MAP. He's always willing to help!

Adam

90mm LMAF or AEM 3.5 Bar MAP sensor

toyman

Black95GTS

Active Member

Similar threads

90mm LMAF or AEM 3.5 Bar MAP sensor

toyman

Black95GTS

Active Member

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency