• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

95 Cobra Intake Manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95GTV8
  • Start date Start date Sep 3, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

95GTV8

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
386
3
0
Washington State
Sep 3, 2005
#1
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #1
i have a stock 95 GT, im wondering will it be a noticeable performance increase if i put a 95 cobra intake (upper/lower) on my stock 95 GT. Also how much hp are the cobra intakes good up to? And are the cobra intake manifolds a good all around manifold?
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Sep 3, 2005
#2
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #2
95GTV8 said:
i have a stock 95 GT, im wondering will it be a noticeable performance increase if i put a 95 cobra intake (upper/lower) on my stock 95 GT. Also how much hp are the cobra intakes good up to? And are the cobra intake manifolds a good all around manifold?
Click to expand...

im not sure how much power its good for but i noticed a gain when i put mine on. i dont have any numbers and i doubt it is anything drastic but i would say definetly go for it.
 

95GTV8

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
386
3
0
Washington State
Sep 3, 2005
#3
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #3
does anybody else have any input with any hp numbers? and will the cobra be a good choice because i eventually intend to get some nice cylinders heads, and a new camshaft. but for now i would just have the cobra manifold, so im wondering how much hp/tq increase i should be looking @
 

Labora

Founding Member
Jun 11, 2000
1,855
26
69
Dallas, Texas
Sep 3, 2005
#4
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #4
Much better then stock GT intake, and flows a few cfm under most aftermarket intakes with some port work could flow even better. Do a search been talked about more then a few times.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 4, 2005
#5
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #5
95GTV8 said:
does anybody else have any input with any hp numbers? and will the cobra be a good choice because i eventually intend to get some nice cylinders heads, and a new camshaft. but for now i would just have the cobra manifold, so im wondering how much hp/tq increase i should be looking @
Click to expand...
You will LOVE that manifold...I think it's one of the nicest looking and all-purpose manifolds... If you polish and or paint the plate in a nice red/black scheme, it looks hot. I dont know how much HP you'll pick up with only that, but add a TB and MAM to it, and you'll feel a huge difference. I know a guy that had a 700 HP car with that intake...it was extrude honed.

I say go for it.!!!

RC
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Sep 4, 2005
#6
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #6
Great intake, I still have mine. I doubt your gonna find anyone who put on an intake and went strait to the dyno. But it is definatley a worth while mod. Matched with a good throttle body you won't be disapointed.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 4, 2005
#7
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #7
I really like the Cobra/Explorer intakes (GTs cost too much). You aksed in a PM about the difference in porting a lower and the Cobra - here is our very own Rio5.0's dyno tests of both on the same combo (thanks Rio!). The difference is in the rpm where peak power is made.......
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Sep 4, 2005
#8
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #8
tmoss said:
I really like the Cobra/Explorer intakes (GTs cost too much). You aksed in a PM about the difference in porting a lower and the Cobra - here is our very own Rio5.0's dyno tests of both on the same combo (thanks Rio!). The difference is in the rpm where peak power is made.......
Click to expand...


Do you recommend porting both the upper and lower Cobra intakes? Your website seems to indicate porting lower is sufficient. Also do you have comaparison between stock cobra and ported cobra?
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Sep 4, 2005
#9
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #9
Pirating!

hey tmoss, haven't been on here for a while...nice to see you're still sharing your knowledge.

By the way, the ported GT manifold I picked up while I was in afghanistan (I didn't buy it there, if anyone's thinking that) has actually made quite the difference.

I'd like you to explain to me at some point though, we talked about the walls between the runners that have been milled out. Apparently that might not be good....could you explain this?
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Sep 4, 2005
#10
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #10
he has a chart somewhere that shows the cfm for the upper and lower seperate...... i think it may be in the faq section here........


I can speak from experience, his porting WORKS>.......



jason
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 5, 2005
#11
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #11
95COBRA241 said:
Do you recommend porting both the upper and lower Cobra intakes? Your website seems to indicate porting lower is sufficient. Also do you have comaparison between stock cobra and ported cobra?
Click to expand...


I would not port a Cobra upper - just the lower for the right applications. If you need more than ~250cfm of flow that a ported lower/stock upper Cobra gives (and you can REALLY use it!) then step up to an aftermarket intake with a larger cross section.

Yes, I have a dyno with the only difference being the lower porting. It is in my website in the "Community" section then the "photo' section and then "dyno comparisons" - look for "LX Mike's" dyno. Picked up HP and TQ across the board with 16HP/13ft-lbs peak increases.

http://www.tmossporting.com/Community/PhotoGalleries/tabid/331/Default.aspx?AlbumID=1785-50
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
Sep 5, 2005
#12
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #12
I'm making 415 to the wheels with my Cobra. The lower is gasket matched.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 5, 2005
#13
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #13
xr8d302 said:
I'd like you to explain to me at some point though, we talked about the walls between the runners that have been milled out. Apparently that might not be good....could you explain this?
Click to expand...

In my opinion, the dividere between #1 & #5 may be removed and MAY (untested by me) provide some extra flow for those lower flowing runners. Anyone want to do some dyno testing?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 5, 2005
#14
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #14
The flow testing I have indicates the lowers flow ~140-150cfm and the uppers flow ~190-195cfm with some runners (#1,#5,#7 in the lower, #3, #^ in the upper) being below average.
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Sep 5, 2005
#15
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #15
tom are you talking about removing the actual port wall between the number 1&5 cylinders...... i saw that done on a stock intake someone posted a while back...... You think it would actually work?



jason
 
F

Finally a 5.0

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
65
0
0
Sep 5, 2005
#16
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #16
tmoss said:
I really like the Cobra/Explorer intakes (GTs cost too much). You aksed in a PM about the difference in porting a lower and the Cobra - here is our very own Rio5.0's dyno tests of both on the same combo (thanks Rio!). The difference is in the rpm where peak power is made.......
Click to expand...

it looks to me like the ported stock gt intake would be more beneficial than a stock cobra...or am i looking at it wrong. i would much rather have the 15 ft lbs. of torque than the 5 hp you lose.
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Sep 6, 2005
#17
  • Sep 6, 2005
  • #17
yeah, but trust me that ported lower will only take you so far....... before the intake will start starving heads, if you go any bigger.......If you aren't doing a ton of mods, it is great for the street, makes a lot of torque.......



jason
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 6, 2005
#18
  • Sep 6, 2005
  • #18
Finally a 5.0 said:
it looks to me like the ported stock gt intake would be more beneficial than a stock cobra...or am i looking at it wrong. i would much rather have the 15 ft lbs. of torque than the 5 hp you lose.
Click to expand...

I agree, but that is a personal call - gotta think about what you have, where you are going, in what time frame and what you want. Heavy cars and autos need the torque more than a 5 speed, but it can all be put to good use.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 6, 2005
#19
  • Sep 6, 2005
  • #19
mytight95 said:
tom are you talking about removing the actual port wall between the number 1&5 cylinders...... i saw that done on a stock intake someone posted a while back...... You think it would actually work?



jason
Click to expand...

Yes, there is a chance it will work if done right, but I have not done it or tested it yet. I did crunch some numbers to see which ones would benefit from removing the walls in the top of the lower - looked at valve overlap and the adjacentcies of the runners.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Sep 6, 2005
#20
  • Sep 6, 2005
  • #20
A cobra intake will give you a decent HP/TQ gain but you wont see the full effects of it until you free up other parts of the motor. Most of the time just one single part will not work well on its own, its a conjuncton of parts working together that give you the best results. Such as if you chage the cat back but leave the stock H Pipe, change to an O/R H pipe and the power you saw from the catback will go up b/c overall you helped to free up the system more.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 1999 cobra removed lower intake manifold to crossovertube
  • hvcobra99
  • Sep 6, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
0
Views
160
SVT Tech Forum Sep 6, 2026
hvcobra99
J
SN95 Hello new to this app
  • James S
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
185
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
Habu135
J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
294
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
Engine 95 GT and 95 Cobra sensors and TB gasket
  • Sonic
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
424
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 23, 2025
WhiteCobra95
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
245
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?