• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Accufab Intake And Plenum

  • Thread starter Thread starter JTAM963
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#1
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #1
I have a stock auto GT and already getting a MAC cold air intake...and was thinking of the intake plenum combo...which size would be best 70mm or 75mm and keep in mind i might get a blower down the road and id like to not have to change it??
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Apr 5, 2005
#2
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #2
If you are getting a blower later , then might as well get 75mm. You won't get as much power now though, just be warned.

www.modulardepot.com Tech Articles -> Plenum showdowns
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#3
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #3
will i still be able to feel the difference like the mod depot article around 6 in hp and 7 in torque?? Or should i just stick with the 70mm??? I want to feel difference now
 

StangPro

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
441
0
0
Roseville, MI
Apr 5, 2005
#4
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #4
Unless you're leaving your car mostly stock forver, go 75. There's almost no difference on a mostly stock car, between the two and the 75 will make more power as you add more mods.

Here's our test with a stock GT with only a (worthless) drop-in k&n.

http://www.stangpro.com/html/articles/dragon.htm
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#5
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #5
so with an accufab just get the 75mm combo and it will fit fine with a MAC cai...because im getting one for 65m from a guy on stangnet trader...and also a timing adjuster...
 
H

hbk_136

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
194
0
0
Southeastern GA
Apr 5, 2005
#6
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #6
A 70mm is just fine for my blower car, i might be losing like 1 or 2 hp, but the money i saved by doing that allowed me to make up that hp.
 

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Apr 5, 2005
#7
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #7
I'll be getting a SC hopefully this year. I bought the 75mm and put it on my now N/A engine and I could still feel a gain with it on. Definitely worth it.
 

Mirrahasmycar

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
210
0
0
CT
Apr 5, 2005
#8
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #8
if you go with CAI, 75mm tb and 75mm plenum, you'll feel an increase in power gaurenteed

even just the CAI, and TB will give to a nice boost,
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Apr 5, 2005
#9
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #9
Read both articles, 70mm vs 75mm. If you think you are going to mod past the car featured in the article (I believe its most if not all bolt ons) then 70 mm is the better choice.
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#10
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #10
d

what does everyone think about the DRAGON PLenum and the DEMOLET INtake..im already probably getting a MAC kit..any real DIFF in performance??
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#11
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #11
ANY1 any advice??
 

1992 2.3LX

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
885
0
0
Ky
Apr 5, 2005
#12
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #12
JTAM963 said:
what does everyone think about the DRAGON PLenum and the DEMOLET INtake..im already probably getting a MAC kit..any real DIFF in performance??
Click to expand...

from the numbers given on Stangpros website it looks pretty damn good.

from stangpros site using the dragon 75mm TB, plenium and Demolet intake.
"With the improved breathing of the DeMolet Tunable Induction, we picked up another 12.7hp and…make sure you're sitting down for this…29.3 ft-lbs of torque."
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#13
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #13
so your pretty much sayin not worth it??????...but im for sure changing cai and intake/plenum
 

1992 2.3LX

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
885
0
0
Ky
Apr 5, 2005
#14
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #14
JTAM963 said:
so your pretty much sayin not worth it??????...but im for sure changing cai and intake/plenum
Click to expand...

if you get all three i think those numbers are pretty good compared to others that i have seen. it is the top runner for a TB and plenium when i get one.

the Accufab is to blingy for the likes of me.

almost 30lbs of torque for around $500 that is pretty good.
 

Gunfighter

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1999
186
0
0
Grapevine, TX
Apr 5, 2005
#15
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #15
given your list of anticipated mods, I'd go w/the 75mm TB
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#16
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #16
Does anyone think brands in either CAI or throttle body/plenum really matter...i was going to to MAC CAI and aCcufab tb/plenum...but its cheaper for the DEmolet Setup...any ideas??
 

1992 2.3LX

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
885
0
0
Ky
Apr 5, 2005
#17
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #17
JTAM963 said:
Does anyone think brands in either CAI or throttle body/plenum really matter...i was going to to MAC CAI and aCcufab tb/plenum...but its cheaper for the DEmolet Setup...any ideas??
Click to expand...
not really they are all within a couple hp and torque numbers of each other.
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#18
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #18
is it true MAC get too hot when driving...or are they fine and better then stock??
 
D

dark.stallion

New Member
Nov 3, 2004
17
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#19
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #19
go with the 75mm...i put the mac cai, accufab 75 tb/plenum and got over 2 tenths off my ET and about 2 mph
 
J

JTAM963

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
64
0
0
Apr 6, 2005
#20
  • Apr 6, 2005
  • #20
what kinda sound would a stock h pipe american thunder catback and jba shorties put out....i want a american muscle sound..deep rumble would it be better stock h or dr gas x??
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine 4.6 Running rough at half throttle
  • jake411
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
116
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 4, 2026
jake411
J
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
428
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
B
Engine 95 mustang Gt
  • Bett23
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
325
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 29, 2025
General karthief
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
318
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
S
01 GT NO IDLE
  • Scwhitten
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
231
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?