• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

ACT sensor, to be or not to be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LaserSVT
  • Start date Start date Jun 19, 2007

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,390
3,536
233
Jun 19, 2007
#1
  • Jun 19, 2007
  • #1
Is the ACT sensor really necessary? My car idles like crap when cold, keeps dying for the first min or two unless I help it. Would no ACT cause this?
 

Nibbie

New Member
Mar 10, 2007
127
0
0
Jun 19, 2007
#2
  • Jun 19, 2007
  • #2
I would suggest you keep it or get a replacment. When an act sensor brakes or gets all gummed up it cant measure the incoming air temp properly. You get hessitation and bogging of the car and it could die. I think it sends the temp to the ECM for proper fuel enrichment. It will make the fuel rich or lean depending on the air temp. So i say keep it. "please sombody correct me if im wrong about the rich or lean part"
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,390
3,536
233
Jun 19, 2007
#3
  • Jun 19, 2007
  • #3
The car did not have one when I bought it. I have the Typhoon intake and it looks like the sensor hole is relocated to the spot just after the EGR spacer facing foreward on the upper plenum, does anyone know if this is correct?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 19, 2007
#4
  • Jun 19, 2007
  • #4
orange92gt said:
Is the ACT sensor really necessary? My car idles like crap when cold, keeps dying for the first min or two unless I help it. Would no ACT cause this?
Click to expand...
Ford didn't install useless sensors.
ACT can cause that, but you need to pull the codes to check for other conditions.


I have no experience with your manifold, but you need to mount the ACT in the airstream. If you can get it in the intake manifold, great.
If you can't get it in the intake, then look to mount it in the inlet tube between the MAF/TB. If that won't work, then drill a hole in the intake air filter box...


jason
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Jun 23, 2007
#5
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #5
The sensor should be placed where it originally was from the factory. If it's relocated, the ECM should be reprogrammed accordingly.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jun 23, 2007
#6
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #6
the ACT is one of the most important sensors in calculating fuel delivery it NEEDS to be there.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 23, 2007
#7
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #7
Here is a discussion I wrote up on moving the ACT from the intake manifold to the air filter box...
http://www.freewebs.com/vristang/eecivfaqs.htm

If you have questions, feel free to ask...


Thumbing through the TwEECer (CalEdit) this is what can be seen...



In the X3Z Calibration

FN 825B - ACT will increase the engine idle rpm after about 192F, maxing out at 64rpm by 208F

FN 220 - EGR Multiplier is 0 until 58F, maxes out at 1 by 60F

FN 126 - Spark advance starts to retard at 160F maxing out at -2* by 190F

FN 135 - WOT spark advance is retarded starting at 150F, maxing out at -6* by 240F

FN 300 - Open Loop Fuel Multiplier is unaffected by ACT (always 1)

SCALAR - ACT MUST be between 100F and 200F for the Adaptive Strategy to start learning



In the A9L Calibration

FN 825B - ACT will increase the engine rpm by 48rpm at 200F, and a max of 72rpm at 226F

EGR Multiplier is .8 until 0F, then rises to a max of 1 by 56F

FN 126 - Spark advance starts to retard at 160F maxing out at -2* at 190F

FN 135 - WOT spark advance is retarded starting at 150F, maxing out at -6* by 240F

FN 300 - Open Loop Fuel Multiplier is .64 until -40F, .81 by 0F, and maxes out at 1 by 76F

SCALAR - ACT MUST be between 100F and 200F for the Adaptive Strategy to start learning



So what does this mean?

Idle speed – Obviously for both calibrations the affect is going to be minimal, assuming all other idle contributors are working properly. Moving the ACT to a cooler location should not have a major impact on idle speed.



EGR – Moving the ACT to a cooler location will affect the function of the EGR. It would not be recommended to try and pass an emissions test with the ACT in the airbox on a cold day (below 60F).



Spark – The Spark Advance is RETARDED with higher temps. Moving the ACT to the airbox can help to keep ignition timing higher. However, keep in mind that Ford used the ACT as a ‘Safety Factor’ for preventing high temp detonation. False information to the EEC-IV will make detonation more likely when the engine is warm/hot.



Fuel Multiplier – The Fuel Multiplier increases with higher ACT temps. Due to the low temps at which the ACT will impact the Fuel Multiplier this is not likely to cause an issue.



Adaptive Strategy – This may be the most critical one for most daily driver Mustangs. Not allowing the Adaptive Control to function (because the ACT never sees 100F in the airbox), could hurt fuel economy and could cause drivability issues.
 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Jun 7, 2015
#8
  • Jun 7, 2015
  • #8
Good info here in this old thread, ...just got code #54, ..cleared it and it came back, ....more money to sensors fund lol
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jun 8, 2015
#9
  • Jun 8, 2015
  • #9
Code 54 – ACT sensor out of range. Broken or damaged wiring, bad ACT sensor. Note that that if the outside air temp is below 50 degrees F that the test for the ACT can be in error.

Check the resistance of the black/white wire to battery ground. If it is less than 2 ohms, it is good. If it is more than 2 ohms, the black/white wire has bad connections or a broken wire. Always take resistance measurements with the circuit powered off.






See the graphic for the 10 pin connector circuit layout.


Then check the resistance of the ACT sender located in the #5 intake runner on most 5.0 stangs.

ACT & ECT test data:

The ACT & ECT have the same thermistor, so the table values are the same

Pin 7 on the computer - ECT signal in. at 176 degrees F it should be .80 volts

Pin 25 on the computer - ACT signal in. at 50 degrees F it should be 3.5 volts. It is a good number if the ACT is mounted in the inlet airbox. If it is mounted in the lower intake manifold, the voltage readings will be lower because of the heat transfer. Here's the table :

68 degrees F = 3.02 v
86 degrees F = 2.62 v
104 degrees F = 2.16 v
122 degrees F = 1.72 v
140 degrees F = 1.35 v
158 degrees F = 1.04 v
176 degrees F = .80 v
194 degrees F = .61

Ohms measures at the computer with the computer disconnected, or at the sensor with the sensor disconnected.
50 degrees F = 58.75 K ohms
68 degrees F = 37.30 K ohms
86 degrees F = 27.27 K ohms
104 degrees F = 16.15 K ohms
122 degrees F = 10.97 K ohms
140 degrees F = 7.60 K ohms
158 degrees F = 5.37 K ohms
176 degrees F = 3.84 K ohms
194 degrees F = 2.80 K ohms
 
Reactions: Grabbin' Asphalt

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Jun 8, 2015
#10
  • Jun 8, 2015
  • #10
Replaced gunky old one, idles very smooth now, cleared codes, system pass #11 ...back to normal operation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Electrical Act
  • Robman8028
  • Jun 15, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
156
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 16, 2025
General karthief
G
Idle surging after warm up
  • GALLY3309
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
98
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
J
Spuddeeing 06 4.0!
  • jester242
  • Dec 22, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
121
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 22, 2025
jester242
J
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
360
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
274
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?