• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Alright gang, built Dart or Coyote?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monkeybutt2000
  • Start date Start date Jan 13, 2024
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 17, 2024
#21
  • Jan 17, 2024
  • #21
 
Reactions: Monkeybutt2000 and General karthief

Cheapskate207

The left one hangs a little lower
5 Year Member
Jan 12, 2020
761
541
113
Maine
Jan 18, 2024
#22
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #22
I personally like a Sbf in foxbodies. Adding a newer modular motor takes away the muscle car vibe to me.
 
Reactions: Monkeybutt2000 and Potomus Pete

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,975
2,957
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 18, 2024
#23
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #23
95BlueStallion said:
I like where your head is at, except my Dart 363 cost me $17k to be built, and that Harrop supercharger kit is $12k... Would it be awesome? Hell yes it would. But damn near $30k in the engine alone? At that point a Coyote with a Roush TVS or Whipple would be way more cost effective. You can find them as take outs all over.
Click to expand...
I had $25K in my 363 long block. Granted, it was a 8K+ drag race engine build.
The same money in a Coyote would have yielded more HP.
But at the time, a Coyote build was not an option as the parts/aftermarket had not caught up yet.
Price out a Dart Iron Eagle Block today. Well over $2K for an unfinished block, if you can get one.
If I had to do it over today, it would be a 7.3 Godzilla.
Hindsight is always 20/20
I cringe at the total $ I have in that engine (now 365 cid) at this point. And I ain't done...
 
Reactions: ThinBlue502

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,945
10,584
203
polk county florida
Jan 18, 2024
#24
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #24
Bullitt347 said:
And I ain't done...
Click to expand...
They are rarely done
 
Reactions: Monkeybutt2000
M

Monkeybutt2000

Mustang Master
Aug 11, 2019
1,387
849
133
Lafayette,IN
Jan 18, 2024
#25
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #25
Big block is out, Coyote is really looking less favorable,just too much work. The Dart would be the last engine built for this car is the only reason I want to do it.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 18, 2024
#26
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #26
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/drt-31374175
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,914
4,036
183
Claremore, OK
Jan 18, 2024
#27
  • Jan 18, 2024
  • #27
“would be the last engine built for this car”…I’ve lied to myself like that a couple of times now.
 
Reactions: Bullitt347

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,103
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Jan 19, 2024
#28
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #28
I guess I'm ignorant, but why would the same money in a coyote yield more power? I got the impression they were done around 500rwhp n/a, far less than a nice combo on a 363, and certainly the limits of both blocks are astronomical on boost.

All of this expensive talk makes me appreciate my more basic daily driver. The expensive cars I built are great, but I'm getting more smiles/$ from the mild build/driver.
 
Reactions: Jersey Joe

ThinBlue502

5 Year Member
May 7, 2019
408
724
113
Ohio
Jan 19, 2024
#29
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #29
AeroCoupe said:
When most talk about a Dart 363 is not a 351W based motor. Its an 8.2 deck Dart block bored to 4.125" with a 3.4" stroke. I could be wrong here but typically that is the case.
Click to expand...
My apologies, complete misunderstanding on my end.

It kind of sounds like OP is sold on SBF. In that case I would just use one of the known builders that offer pre-assembled long blocks. I do understand the desire to keep pushrod based small block.

It’s pretty awesome that there are so many choices out there available today. And that you can take any of those options from budget to overbuilt. I know when I pull/blow my stroked factory block motor I really want some big block thump. A pushrod 7.3 fuel injected gas motor and retain factory A/C? I’m in.

LMR’s series on it really impressed me.
Here’s one episode if anyone is interested.


Also, that not a single person mentioned LS swap lol!
 
Reactions: General karthief

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,945
10,584
203
polk county florida
Jan 19, 2024
#30
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #30
FastDriver said:
The expensive cars I built are great, but I'm getting more smiles/$ from the mild build/driver.
Click to expand...
I've been say'n this for years.
I can remember driving a half 'race car' to and from work, it was a ball for a 'minute'.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jan 19, 2024
#31
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #31
FastDriver said:
I guess I'm ignorant, but why would the same money in a coyote yield more power? I got the impression they were done around 500rwhp n/a, far less than a nice combo on a 363, and certainly the limits of both blocks are astronomical on boost.

All of this expensive talk makes me appreciate my more basic daily driver. The expensive cars I built are great, but I'm getting more smiles/$ from the mild build/driver.
Click to expand...

If coyotes were done at 500hp (assuming you are speaking flywheel), you think that is far less than a 363?
I'd say the max numbers are probably close, but surely the coyote will be a better street setup.

It's not 2015 anymore, where coyote donors are 8k+ and swap parts are few and far between. Options are plentiful and the research is done.
You can do a swap without even worrying about any custom parts as if you were building it from a set of directions.

Pushrod pricing has risen and coyote donors and parts have fallen, making it a much better option than it was 5+ years ago.

If it's a street driver someone is after, i think there is pretty much no way the 363 does it better than a coyote. Not to mention, the coyote setup will probably make more average hp (which is why it will surely drive better in traffic).

To be clear, i have not always been the biggest coyote advocate, the engines were expensive so were the parts associated with it, just not the same as it once was.

I still get the ich for a high rpm NA 363, then i come to my senses and realize i'd be building something worse.

Now when you get into power adders, that could change things, coyote power adders are crazy expensive.
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,914
4,036
183
Claremore, OK
Jan 19, 2024
#32
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #32
I have no idea where you are finding Coyotes cheaper than they were before the whole BS pandemic but all I can find is more expensive donors and parts.

Used swap motors with trans and engine control were $8K to $9K and now are north of $12K.

Crate motor with the 10 speed and engine management went from a little over $15K to now more than $20K.

My whole F100 build is around the Coyote with a 10R80 so I’ve been watching the prices. You still need to deal with the power steering pump issue but most solve that with a Volvo electric pump and controller. You should also move to swap the oil pump gears out to the billet ones.

A solid 363 Dart based build is going to be on par with a Coyote swap cost wise if you are starting from scratch. Will most likely make more hp NA and will definitely make more torque.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 19, 2024
#33
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #33
I've seen a lot of folks that wrapped their cars around various solid objects and want to pay off the car by selling the drive.

More of the "I no wut 1 got" syndrome.
 
B

Brent Francis

Member
Feb 19, 2019
48
5
18
Maryland
Jan 19, 2024
#34
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #34
Monkeybutt2000 said:
Pros and Cons? A Dart longblock from ZSR or Fordstrokers is 11k. A takeout Coyote can be anywhere from 3.5-8k +. In my situation with the Dart, I drop it right in and literally buy nothing. The coyote,the engine install is fairly simple,but the wiring,hydroboost,etc is time consuming. If you were in a position to do this ,which direction would you go and why?
Click to expand...
My vote is for the Dart 363. Everything about them is wicked. With a 205 head and a custom cam you would have an awesome engine
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,975
2,957
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 19, 2024
#35
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #35
Coyote cylinder heads will out flow all SBF inline valve heads stock.
RPM is power.
1K power is easy with nothing more than Billet oil pump gears and a power adder.
A 1K power Coyote will always have better idle/driveability/fuel economy than a 1K power SBF.
A 1K power Coyote will NEVER sound as awesome as a 1K power SBF.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,103
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Jan 19, 2024
#36
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #36
2000xp8 said:
If coyotes were done at 500hp (assuming you are speaking flywheel), you think that is far less than a 363?
I'd say the max numbers are probably close, but surely the coyote will be a better street setup.
Click to expand...

To clarify, I was talking about 500 rwhp coyotes running E85, revving over 8k RPM, and squeezing everything they can out of it. I'm not a coyote expert... My best friend is pretty savvy on them, and had just such a car. 500 rwhp from a 363 is TFS 11R 205cc heads, or AFR 205s, a mild cam, and the right combo of parts away on pump gas. I've seen dynos go closer to 600rwhp with a carb, more RPM, and more aggression. If a factory crate motor that cost the same and made 900 hp with driveability came out, I'd definitely understand the argument. The Coyote isn't that.

Been hearing the driveability argument forever... 4.6 SOHC, DOHC, LS swaps, and on and on with each new engine that comes forth, and I'm not interested in it. I LOVE the driveability of all of my cars. Is a 4 cyl Accord's better? Sure... Does that argument tempt me in the least? Nope. Likewise with the 'yote.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,103
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Jan 19, 2024
#37
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #37
Bullitt347 said:
Coyote cylinder heads will out flow all SBF inline valve heads stock.
Click to expand...
You sure? A quick look seems to indicate coyote heads flowing around 280-290 CFM on tge intake while AFR 205s flow upwards at 320 CFM, granted at what I would consider to be radical lift.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,103
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Jan 19, 2024
#38
  • Jan 19, 2024
  • #38
I guess the Renegade version of the AFR flows even more:




I'll grant the low-end of lift shows significant outperformance. On the high end, not so much. In any case, is this what we care about? The Coyote has 20% less displacement to make up for, and there's no reason an NA Dart build has to give 20% peak RPM.
 

bird_dog0347

still married haven't seen testicles in years
15 Year Member
Jun 7, 2012
2,301
2,037
174
Little Elm, TX
Jan 20, 2024
#39
  • Jan 20, 2024
  • #39
FastDriver said:
To clarify, I was talking about 500 rwhp coyotes running E85, revving over 8k RPM, and squeezing everything they can out of it. I'm not a coyote expert... My best friend is pretty savvy on them, and had just such a car. 500 rwhp from a 363 is TFS 11R 205cc heads, or AFR 205s, a mild cam, and the right combo of parts away on pump gas. I've seen dynos go closer to 600rwhp with a carb, more RPM, and more aggression. If a factory crate motor that cost the same and made 900 hp with driveability came out, I'd definitely understand the argument. The Coyote isn't that.

Been hearing the driveability argument forever... 4.6 SOHC, DOHC, LS swaps, and on and on with each new engine that comes forth, and I'm not interested in it. I LOVE the driveability of all of my cars. Is a 4 cyl Accord's better? Sure... Does that argument tempt me in the least? Nope. Likewise with the 'yote.
Click to expand...

So Ford makes a crate engine that makes 580 HP on pump gas NA, with a warranty. I don't think it's unreasonable to get even more out of a Coyote from a respected engine builder who isn't held to the same marketing standards and warranty standards as Ford. Granted, Ford's is much higher in the price range than what most would say is respectable here.

https://lmr.com/item/M6007A52XS/ford-performance-52-aluminator-xs-crate-engine-m-6007-a52xs
 
Reactions: Noobz347

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 20, 2024
#40
  • Jan 20, 2024
  • #40
bird_dog0347 said:
So Ford makes a crate engine that makes 580 HP on pump gas NA, with a warranty. I don't think it's unreasonable to get even more out of a Coyote from a respected engine builder who isn't held to the same marketing standards and warranty standards as Ford. Granted, Ford's is much higher in the price range than what most would say is respectable here.

https://lmr.com/item/M6007A52XS/ford-performance-52-aluminator-xs-crate-engine-m-6007-a52xs
Click to expand...
Well hell, if we're going to go down this road:

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6007-M52SC

 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
I found this for people that has a supercharged 5.0 mustang
  • mustangfan1990
  • Feb 24, 2008
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 25, 2008
mustangfan1990
FUNNY story, must read :)
  • super302
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 10, 2005
Blackened302
  • Sticky
Official FAQ!
  • Wills Black 98
  • May 12, 2003
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
6
Views
28K
Mustang Sound & Shine All Oct 27, 2015
Adieu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?