• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Aluminum Driveshaft

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkHorse02GT
  • Start date Start date Mar 6, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

DarkHorse02GT

Member
Feb 12, 2004
156
0
16
41
Tuscaloosa/Mobile, AL
Mar 6, 2004
#1
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #1
Ok, from what ive read on here, the FRPP aluminum driveshaft is lighter and stronger than stock, pretty inexpensive, and pretty easy to install. 1) Is all this true? 2) It says on pretty much every website that its listed on that because of the reduced rotational mass it puts more of the HP the engine makes to the wheels. This checks out in my head, but is this true? If so how much more (%-wise) does it put down? and finally 3) Any increased noise with it? Thanks to all ya'll that know more than me for answering.. - Mark
 

MT1083

New Member
Sep 16, 2003
1,033
0
0
Charlotte, NC
Mar 6, 2004
#2
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #2
DarkHorse02GT said:
Ok, from what ive read on here, the FRPP aluminum driveshaft is lighter and stronger than stock, pretty inexpensive, and pretty easy to install. 1) Is all this true? 2) It says on pretty much every website that its listed on that because of the reduced rotational mass it puts more of the HP the engine makes to the wheels. This checks out in my head, but is this true? If so how much more (%-wise) does it put down? and finally 3) Any increased noise with it? Thanks to all ya'll that know more than me for answering.. - Mark
Click to expand...

Yes, the driveshaft is lighter, stronger, and extemely easy to install. It should theoretically (sp?) free up more hp, but don't count on any SOTP feel. It feels no different at all than stock. I have no additional noise from stock. Its just nice to know that you have a driveshaft that is stronger and lighter. Especially for us s/c'd guys.
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
46
Georgia
Mar 6, 2004
#3
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #3
It will also help with any type of vibration you might get with aftermarket gears
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Mar 6, 2004
#4
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #4
Real easy install but helps if you have a bud to give a hand.
 

DarkHorse02GT

Member
Feb 12, 2004
156
0
16
41
Tuscaloosa/Mobile, AL
Mar 6, 2004
#5
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #5
Sounds good guys.... thanks for responding..... I'ma pick one up eventually before I supercharge (Gotta savings account going for an S/C)..... I didnt figure thered be any SOTP feel to it, theres only so much physics can do for you. Later - Mark
 
D

DSG03MACH1

New Member
Feb 6, 2004
21
0
0
Mar 6, 2004
#6
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #6
Is there a difference between an alum shaft for a manual as opposed to an auto. I didn't see two shafts or part numbers listed so I assume they are the same for both trannies. Anyone know for sure??? I have an 03 MACH 1 with a 5 spd.

Thanks,
Joe
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
50
Puerto Rico
www.cardomain.com
Mar 6, 2004
#7
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #7
MT1083 said:
Yes, the driveshaft is lighter, stronger, and extemely easy to install. It should theoretically (sp?) free up more hp, but don't count on any SOTP feel. It feels no different at all than stock. I have no additional noise from stock. Its just nice to know that you have a driveshaft that is stronger and lighter. Especially for us s/c'd guys.
Click to expand...
Hmmm....I think I'm going to make the aluminum shaft my next mod.
 
B

Bulldog6Z6

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
163
0
0
Houston Texas
Mar 6, 2004
#8
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #8
have one sittin in my room waiting to install,, its pretty big
 
0

03Sleeper

New Member
Apr 29, 2003
464
0
0
49
Fordville,USA
Mar 6, 2004
#9
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #9
where are you getting it from Can you post a link?
Thanks
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
41
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
www.geocities.com
Mar 7, 2004
#10
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #10
got mine from gefracing together with my ds loop and 4.10.

install for DS was like 15 seconds litterally...
 

Dominus_Servi

New Member
Apr 28, 2003
240
0
0
45
San Diego, CA
Mar 7, 2004
#11
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #11
Would there be any point in the upgraded driveshaft for a car that will most likely remain NA? Mentioned above, there is supposedly not much gain in power. Anyone else have input on that?
 
W

wickedgt70

New Member
Mar 5, 2003
178
0
0
San Jose, CA
Mar 7, 2004
#12
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #12
Personally, a driveshaft is low on my priority list. If you are putting down serious HP, I think it is a good mod. It may also be a good mod if you have rear-end vibration due to gears. But it will give little SOTP increase, so I will save my cash for other mods. Just my $.02, your situation and needs may be different.
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
50
Puerto Rico
www.cardomain.com
Mar 7, 2004
#13
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #13
For how much the aluminum driveshaft runs?
 

pdl2flr

New Member
Dec 17, 2003
154
0
0
Leesburg, VA
Mar 7, 2004
#14
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #14
Just puchased mine from PartShopper for $190 shipped. But I have seen them for around $175.
 

menasci

Member
Aug 17, 2003
640
1
16
51
Chandler, AZ
Mar 7, 2004
#15
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #15
I have an Aluminum Driveshaft.
I installed it 2 weeks after my 4.10's.
I think my Triax vibrates a little less but that's about it.
My car was always smooth even with the gears.
However, I am still glad I did it.
The stock DS looks like a peice of garbage.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
41
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
www.geocities.com
Mar 7, 2004
#16
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #16
menasci said:
The stock DS looks like a peice of garbage.
Click to expand...

Couldn't agree more.

Anyhow, have anyone ever took the time to dyno the car, install the alum DS, then re-dyno and see if the hp actually increased?
 

DarkHorse02GT

Member
Feb 12, 2004
156
0
16
41
Tuscaloosa/Mobile, AL
Mar 7, 2004
#17
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #17
Yeah I was wonderin the same thing.... I can't imagine it would be that great of a difference. Oh and anyone know how much lighter it is than stock?
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
41
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
www.geocities.com
Mar 7, 2004
#18
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #18
I've read it somewhere before but I would say 5-10 lbs
 

01GT eibach

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,075
0
36
Pittsburgh, PA
Mar 7, 2004
#19
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #19
I believe the aluminum one is 8 lbs lighter than stock.

Regarding SOTP results, my car sure seems to reach revs quicker.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
40
Odessa Tx
Mar 7, 2004
#20
  • Mar 7, 2004
  • #20
Look at it this way, you're making more power without increasing fuel use, you're making the engine more efficient at getting the power to the ground.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Distributor installed wrong
  • djj62478
  • Jun 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
208
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
606
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
589
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Progress Thread 87 T-top slow progress
  • wobbyguy
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
791
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 10, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?