• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

aluminum Flywheel/ Driveshaft dyno results Video & dyno sheet inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tank_567
  • Start date Start date Nov 30, 2009

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Nov 30, 2009
#1
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #1
Well, I have to say this, do not waste your money on Aluminum Flywheel or Driveshaft, I picked up 2rwhp and lost some tq. I dumped about 300 on the flywheel and 200 on the driveshaft. I cant really say it rev up faster, it really feels about the same. The dyno sheet below has my car dyno'd with the stock plenum/tb, with the all of the other mods listed in my sig. The next dyno was with my bbk plenum/75mm tb, the Aluminum Flywheel & Driveshaft.

Video link:
Bob's Mustang dyno - Car Videos on StreetFire

Dyno Sheet:
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Nov 30, 2009
#2
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #2
Couldn't watch the vid and the dyno sheet didn't show, but I'll take your word for it
 
M

mustang timmy

New Member
Nov 3, 2009
0
0
0
va
Nov 30, 2009
#3
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #3
thx for the warning!
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Nov 30, 2009
#4
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #4
02nightmaregt said:
Couldn't watch the vid and the dyno sheet didn't show, but I'll take your word for it
Click to expand...

Sorry about that, just fixed the links
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Nov 30, 2009
#5
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #5
Well i guess i won't be getting an aluminum driveshaft...
 

Shiroelex

There's nothing worse than aut
Founding Member
Aug 23, 2001
728
1
27
Westland, MI
Nov 30, 2009
#6
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #6
I went a tenth faster in the quarter mile after putting in a 12lb flywheel and 6 puck high coefficient clutch. I wouldn't imagine it would make much, if any difference on the actual horsepower numbers. It's more of a driving experience change, and I felt it for sure at the track. Putting an offroad X pipe, lightweight flywheel, and a nice intake/plenum/tb combo will make any 2 valve rev like a 4 valve, possibly even quicker. My engine revs fast as hell.

An aluminum driveshaft, while also reducing rotating mass, also serves as a well balanced replacement for the stocker. I wouldn't trust the stock driveshaft much past 100 for extended periods of time. I'll be getting one for mine sometime soon, as I need to do u joints anyway.
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Nov 30, 2009
#7
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #7
I will be taking the ride down to the track soon, see if all of this will help there
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Nov 30, 2009
#8
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #8
Shiroelex said:
I went a tenth faster in the quarter mile after putting in a 12lb flywheel and 6 puck high coefficient clutch.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, what kinda clutch is that?
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Nov 30, 2009
#9
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #9
So the moral of the story is that a flywheel-driveshaft upgrade is a waist of time? Does the car atleast accelerate smoother from the driveshaft upgrade?
 

Shiroelex

There's nothing worse than aut
Founding Member
Aug 23, 2001
728
1
27
Westland, MI
Nov 30, 2009
#10
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #10
32ValveRom said:
I'm sorry, what kinda clutch is that?
Click to expand...

Very similar to this one:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/XTD-...22?IMSfp=TL0911221810008r15705#ht_5587wt_1166

Grabs like glue, but was a nightmare on the street before I got an adjustable cable, quadrant, and firewall adjuster.
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Nov 30, 2009
#11
  • Nov 30, 2009
  • #11
a lightweight flywheel isn't a power mod. It's a waste of time if you are looking for it to make power.

And as has been stated, AL driveshaft isn't a power mod either.

Who ever said these parts made power?
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Dec 1, 2009
#12
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #12
its not making power, its freeing up power just like adding headers or under drive pulleys.
 

pilks

Member
Jul 15, 2004
109
0
16
Dec 1, 2009
#13
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #13
oh boy
 

billthecougnut

New Member
Sep 15, 2008
3
0
0
Everett
Dec 28, 2009
#14
  • Dec 28, 2009
  • #14
Its a bummer you changed your throttle body and intake at the same time. It is hard to difiniatively prove one mod isn't a gain or a loss, when you pair it with another. One can be canceling the other (I.E. your throttle body may actually be stealing rear wheel hp that your driveshaft gained) I am not suggesting that this is the case, but just like in a court of law.... there is a reasonable doubt now for your claim in my mind.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jan 4, 2010
#15
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #15
In a fixed RPM test the flywheel and drive shaft should neither add nor remove any HP. In a acceleration test the lighter parts will take less energy / HP to accelerate and this should show. The faster the rate of accelerate the more it will show up.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 4, 2010
#16
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #16
GT sounds good. As stated, those mods will help combat parasitic loss, but not really "show" and increased power. It will, in theory at least, accelerate better.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 4, 2010
#17
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #17
And also, keep in mind you are doing nothing but hurting the motor by revving to 64-6500 RPM.

Stock cams/intake run out of breath around the mid 5k range, no reason to shift over 6k at all without cams or headwork, especially on stock valve springs which will start to float around 63-6400 RPM and yours have 100+k on them.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jan 4, 2010
#18
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #18
Most people pick up times over their used up clutch with a new clutch and flywheel - regardless of type.
 

crazystang25

Member
Jan 25, 2009
492
0
16
Jan 4, 2010
#19
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #19
ya, i havent done a driveshaft or flywheel upgrade but i do know the stock driveshaft is fairly light already, i can curl mine with one arm so the aluminum one would have to weigh almost nothin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
99 Gt Turbo Project
  • BoostStang99
  • Feb 18, 2016
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 13, 2020
alwayshi
A
S
  • Locked
SOLD 2000 Ford Mustang Gt Nasa Cmc Racer Or Hpde
  • SPEED DETAILS
  • May 17, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 17, 2016
SPEED DETAILS
S
Black Jack: Now a little less of a rust bucket
  • FastDriver
  • May 29, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 41 42 43
Replies
850
Views
182K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Monday at 10:19 PM
FastDriver
  • Locked
Expired 2001 Mustang Gt Project Car For Sale
  • Selling01gt
  • Jul 22, 2014
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jul 31, 2014
Selling01gt
331ci 9:1 compression AFR 185 comp headed dyno results inside!
  • Killercanary
  • Jun 24, 2010
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
24K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 24, 2010
sgarrelts01
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?