• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Anybody running a 347 with AFR165's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rootus
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2004

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Mar 30, 2004
#1
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #1
Just curious. Dyno?
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Mar 30, 2004
#2
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #2
ttt im very interested too!!
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 30, 2004
#3
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #3
I explored this idea with Ed C. and he told me not to waste my time and just sell them and buy a set of 185's.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Mar 30, 2004
#4
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #4
i find used 185s for less than used 165s all the time. they are easier to find around here than 165s

I think you should be fine.
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 30, 2004
#5
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #5
Doh!!! Iwas thinking of building a 347 in auto class... to put under my 165's.


Ed said no though Killercanary?
 
9

94DreamGT

Founding Member
Jul 19, 2000
593
0
16
Indiana
Mar 30, 2004
#6
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #6
You thinkin of changing that combo already Dave??? You just got it together last year

I think you need to take it to the track with some sticky tires and get it to really show its potential...I'm sure with the right air, launch, tuning, etc...that car has mid 12's @ 110mph written all over it.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Mar 30, 2004
#7
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #7
... look at his dyno
 
9

94DreamGT

Founding Member
Jul 19, 2000
593
0
16
Indiana
Mar 30, 2004
#8
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #8
If I recall correctly...those were his "new" dyno numbers. When he first got the combo running it put down something like 305rwhp...which could equate to the earlier statement about mid 12's @ 110mph properly driven...yada, yada, yada.

I don't know what happened to the car and why it's now making less power...but there are plenty of fox cars with the AFR/FTI/Edel combo's going low 12's and even high 11's at anywhere from 109mph-115mph. I'm sure an SN95 could be just a hair off those with proper tuning etc...
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 30, 2004
#9
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #9
Sleepy McNastee said:
Ed said no though Killercanary?
Click to expand...


No, he just told me for the combo I wanted to run and the numbers I wanted out of it, it would be better for me to sell the combo I have and start over with 185's.


Dave, something is wrong with your combo, but hang in there, you'll figure it out. Like I said before, I'd try ditching that cobra setup in your tweecer. The stock timing table aren't hurting me...
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Mar 30, 2004
#10
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #10
Building a 347 with AFR 205s myself. Fixing to sell my AFR 185s though, taking them to the shop to get them decked and checked, should have them up for sale by the weekend.

Troy
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 30, 2004
#11
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #11
Dave, I just watched your dyno video and man there was all sorts of stuff coming out your exhaust. Are you running pig rich, or do you have an oil burning issue? That is something I'd definitely look at. For as much blowby as I have, I've never seen smoke come from my tail pipes.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 30, 2004
#12
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #12
Damn, yeah Dave that is a ***** load spitting out of your pipes. That might be have your problem.

Jake
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 30, 2004
#13
  • Mar 30, 2004
  • #13
Killercanary said:
No, he just told me for the combo I wanted to run and the numbers I wanted out of it, it would be better for me to sell the combo I have and start over with 185's.

I see.

Its funny, I dont even know Ed Curtis except from all the stuff I ve read on Stangnet, but it appears he is the man. It also appears that I am becoming addicted to Stangnet.
Click to expand...
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Mar 31, 2004
#14
  • Mar 31, 2004
  • #14
You've got a nice combo there, but why only 6lbs of IC boost?
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Mar 31, 2004
#15
  • Mar 31, 2004
  • #15
Killercanary said:
Dave, I just watched your dyno video and man there was all sorts of stuff coming out your exhaust. Are you running pig rich, or do you have an oil burning issue? That is something I'd definitely look at. For as much blowby as I have, I've never seen smoke come from my tail pipes.
Click to expand...
It's not that much, really -- maybe just the way the camera picked it up. The exhaust was almost clear for most of it, with a couple of distinct puffs of black smoke as the EEC changed the tuning (saw this same effect on most of the other cars there, it seems normal), and a bit of blue smoke when the dyno operator came off the throttle (again normal, that's the huge vacuum pulling crankcase vapors through the PCV). Compared to a bone stock LS1 (Camaro SS) my car was clean (but the LS1 put down almost 30 more rwhp and 15 more rwtq). I saw several '03 Cobras blowing a bit of blue smoke *during* the dyno run while at WOT (all modified, though, higher than normal boost) ... at least I didn't get any of that on mine.

The A/F curve actually looks slightly lean, according to the meter they had on the dyno. After I make some changes to the engine, I will need to buy some dyno time to try and dial the A/F ratio in ... probably 12.75 or so would be good.

As for the 347, I'm not making plans right this instant, but I've had this discussion before and that's why I was curious as to whether anyone had tried it. I'm positive the 165's aren't optimal, but people have been running heads with much less ability than AFR165's on stroked 302's and 351's for a long time. So it wouldn't seem to me that it would be *that* bad.

Dave
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 31, 2004
#16
  • Mar 31, 2004
  • #16
Just incase you get the itch, here's pretty much every thing you need. Then just get the turbo and you'll be set...

http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=472660

Jake
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Apr 3, 2004
#17
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #17
Killercanary said:
You've got a nice combo there, but why only 6lbs of IC boost?
Click to expand...

I got the 9 psi kit before my new setup, and with the new h/c/i I am only seeing six or seven psi... I can't get a good boost reading because my tires spin like a mofo, and the boost needle goes nuts. But with a slight loss of total pressure through the intercooler and the new goodies, 6 psi seems about right.

BTW I still have the stock "waffle" 16's , so no more boost until I get new treads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
213
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
274
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
332
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
83
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
283
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?