• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Anyone seen this suspension setup?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tweet66
  • Start date Start date Jun 13, 2009
T

tweet66

Founding Member
May 19, 2001
589
0
17
Pennsauken, NJ
Jun 13, 2009
#1
  • Jun 13, 2009
  • #1
Thought it looks nice but maybe a bit too much??

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MAX-....c0.m245&_trkparms=65:12|39:1|72:317|240:1318
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 13, 2009
#2
  • Jun 13, 2009
  • #2
Actually look pretty cheap to me for all you get. With tilt and rack didn't it say ? Something like TCP for front and rear can vary 5-7k just for front and rear suspension, No rack or subframing. If it works, could be a good deal.
Nice he knows the %'s of his kit, when most don't. Don't know how much the spider webbing did under the car, but looks pretty good overall. I'd be curious on his numbers at different ride heights.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 13, 2009
#3
  • Jun 13, 2009
  • #3
the design is well though out, and there are things i like and dont like. i think the rear suspension could have been a better design, and i would like to see some gusseting on the various brackets. as for the cost, it is about the same as the complete griggs racing gr350 suspension kit for the same car.
 
T

tweet66

Founding Member
May 19, 2001
589
0
17
Pennsauken, NJ
Jun 13, 2009
#4
  • Jun 13, 2009
  • #4
The front suspension looks pretty well thought out but the cross bracing (webbing??) on the rear looks flimsy. I actually like the look of the sub-frame connectors but they're definitely not a stand alone piece. Seems like you have to buy the whole rear or front but it can't be pieced together as you wallet allows...
 

Wildbill3

New Member
Jun 10, 2009
57
0
0
Jun 14, 2009
#5
  • Jun 14, 2009
  • #5
system

It's appartentlly a New system onther web site MAX-G it says introductory price 9000K soo has it been track tested, ther isnt much different on the site from the ebay pics
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jun 14, 2009
#6
  • Jun 14, 2009
  • #6
I am surprised that the rear upper link is single shear. It would be cool if eveything was moved inward so that it would allow a minitub back to the frame rail.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 14, 2009
#7
  • Jun 14, 2009
  • #7
one other thing that bothers me is that with all the money they want you to spend with them, and they cant include a driveshaft loop?
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Jun 14, 2009
#8
  • Jun 14, 2009
  • #8
Several issues:

1. Doesn't appear to be a provision for front sway bar (rear you could probably work in). Any suspension company that doesn't include a provision for a sway bar really doesn't understand suspension.

2. Doesn't appear to be a power rack. Wonder if one is available...

3. I'm with others here and not sold on the gusseting...


That said, the front suspension setup seems pretty slick, just like to see incorporation of a sway bar and power steering.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 15, 2009
#9
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #9
Bullitt said:
Several issues:

1. Doesn't appear to be a provision for front sway bar (rear you could probably work in). Any suspension company that doesn't include a provision for a sway bar really doesn't understand suspension.

2. Doesn't appear to be a power rack. Wonder if one is available...

3. I'm with others here and not sold on the gusseting...


That said, the front suspension setup seems pretty slick, just like to see incorporation of a sway bar and power steering.
Click to expand...

hmmm, i didnt notice the lack of a front sway bar. as for the power steering, or lack there of, that is easily remedied.
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jun 15, 2009
#10
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #10
i think its heavy, very heavy. so i am not a fan. i like the front suspension i designed/built better. also i prefer the rear mounting location of the rack and pinion or rear steer. It can give better steering geoemtry for ackerman affect.

in the rear i dont like triangulated four bar. i like 3link or parrallel 4link. too much bind in a triangulated 4bar.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 15, 2009
#11
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #11
5280/4 said:
i think its heavy, very heavy. so i am not a fan. i like the front suspension i designed/built better. also i prefer the rear mounting location of the rack and pinion or rear steer. It can give better steering geoemtry for ackerman affect.

in the rear i dont like triangulated four bar. i like 3link or parrallel 4link. too much bind in a triangulated 4bar.
Click to expand...

i dont mind the triangulated four link, as long as spherical bearings are used for maximum flexibility, but i dont like the extremely short upper arms on their rear suspension. as for the rest, they seem to have used light weight tubing for everything.
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jun 15, 2009
#12
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #12
wow a whole 65% antisquat. I hope its adjustable.

they might use lightweight tubing, but i think its overkill. it looks like you add alot of weight to the car.
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Jun 15, 2009
#13
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #13
rbohm said:
hmmm, i didnt notice the lack of a front sway bar. as for the power steering, or lack there of, that is easily remedied.
Click to expand...

depends on what they used for the rack...
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 16, 2009
#14
  • Jun 16, 2009
  • #14
5280/4 said:
wow a whole 65% antisquat. I hope its adjustable.

they might use lightweight tubing, but i think its overkill. it looks like you add alot of weight to the car.
Click to expand...

looks can be deceiving.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Ebay: Rear Disc Brake Kit
  • Scudly
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 20, 2009
CraigMBA
B
Help with brakes please.
  • Bullitt66
  • Mar 26, 2009
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 27, 2009
2nd Mustang
0
Cheap Turbo kit on ebay...
  • 007
  • May 30, 2009
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 7, 2009
lvmustanggt
Own a Piece of Foxbody Mustang History
  • RARE NOTCH
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 28, 2009
ID89GT
Roush 88 saleen truck
  • BigDanTheMan
  • May 28, 2009
  • Special Production
Replies
4
Views
2K
Special Production Jul 6, 2009
nickpic
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?