• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Are 1.7 Roller Rockers Worth The Money With Stock Cam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BKM48198
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2015

BKM48198

15 Year Member
Jun 7, 2008
377
27
49
Ypsilanti, Michigan
Jan 18, 2015
#1
  • Jan 18, 2015
  • #1
I have a 5.0 with a Mustang cam, GT40 heads, 70mm Mass air, 65mmTB& spacer, with BBK shorty headers. I have upgraded the stock valve springs with a set of TFS valve springs and am thinking about getting a set of 1.7 Roller Rockers, just not sure if they would be beneficial to my set-up or if I should just wait for better heads. It might be a while before I could get the heads, I plan on a higher stall convertor and built AOD first...........then maybe a different cam. Will I notice a difference with the roller rockers compared to the stock ones?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jan 18, 2015
#2
  • Jan 18, 2015
  • #2
Yes- they will give you about the same lift as a B cam with a better LSA and driveability. I'd say about 15-20 hp.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Jan 19, 2015
#3
  • Jan 19, 2015
  • #3
With your mods, a bigger cam will make more power. The higher lift arms will act like a bigger cam with less installation hassle. So as long as piston to valve clearance is still OK, it is a good idea. The roller parts will reduce some friction and free up some power too.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jan 19, 2015
#4
  • Jan 19, 2015
  • #4
Now lets also keep in mind that 15-20 hp isnt all that noticeable on the seat of the pants dyno, and that $200+ could be put toward making your slush box more efficient so you actually feel the power you are making. A firmer shift, and less parasitic loss will make the car feel a lot more fun and utilize the power you have. If you have no plans for a manual trans swap, I would start there. Did it in my V8 ranger, and it felt like a different engine.
 
Reactions: 90lxwhite
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
163
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
620
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
983
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
D
No start
  • dkrupp79
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
197
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
dkrupp79
D
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
267
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?