• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Are 30lbs too big?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drews93fox
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 24, 2010
#1
  • Jun 24, 2010
  • #1
So I have twin turbo charged my 1993 lx mustang. It has 7-9 lbs for wastegates. I have installed 75mm throttle body, 75mm mass air, 30lb injectors, 255lph fuel pump, I had my stock heads cleaned up and new seals put in and my upper all cleaned too. My question is when i was driving it last night every time that i down shifted i had a white cloud behind me. Other than that the car i running great and not a problem just when i down shift. I think that this is a cloud of unbernt fuel (from what i have heard) so whats the problem? Are my injectors too big or could one be dumping fuel in when its suppost to be closed? and i did have a custom chip made for my setup could this possiblly what my problem is. I dont have a air fuel meter so i really have no idea what the ratio is? Thanks for all the help
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Jun 25, 2010
#2
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #2
I would def say 30s are not to big. I like you do not have a wide band guage, but it is my next investment. I have 50lb injectors on my car, and im out of fuel at 5500 rpm.. But i think my prob is volume, lines,rails etc!!! When you had your heads cleaned what kind of head gaskets did you use?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jun 25, 2010
#3
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #3
You're twin turbo and only running 30's? That white cloud is probably coolant, from popping a headgasket from going lean! You'll probably need at least 42's, but 60's might be a better choice.

For reference:
white cloud = coolant
black cloud = fuel
blue = oil
 
3

302GTS

If you need herpes, I'm your man!
Apr 20, 2009
481
2
18
Largo, FL
Jun 25, 2010
#4
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #4
^+1

When I was planning on throwing a single turbo at my little ole pushrod, my tuner recommended 42#'ers, and that was only to hit around 350-400 at the wheels. 30's are definitely too little!!
 

lancec2c30

Member
May 14, 2008
570
0
16
Washington
Jun 25, 2010
#5
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #5
I'm assuming you just bolted an ebay twin setup on your car.

Like said above, I would at least run 42's on a turbo setup. And if you haven't had your car tuned and watched the a/f, a wideband gauge should be installed.

I wonder if the smoke you are seeing is from not running a catch can. With what you have told us so far, I assume you are still using the stock pcv setup.
 
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 25, 2010
#6
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #6
when i put my heads back on i used fel-pro gaskets all the way around. when i run my car i took the radiator cap off and i dont have any bubbles and i dont have any water in my oil. This just confuses me that its not a head gasket but im practly new so..... lol I did talk to my mechanic and he said that the smoke is prob from condensation in the engine and exhaust system. IS this possible? I do live in Iowa and its been hitting 90 to 95 degrees here. Why would the car go lean when i down shift? And im not down shifting and then hammering it all i was doing was slowing down. When i did kinda get into it i didnt have a puff of white smoke. Even tho im just running 7-9 lbs they are still small? I thought that 30s were big enough to support 350 to 400 hp? As for the pcv setup I am running a k&n breather on my head cover and i plugged the hole from the throttle body. Thanks for all of the input
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 25, 2010
#7
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #7
Drews93fox said:
As for the pcv setup I am running a k&n breather on my head cover and i plugged the hole from the throttle body. Thanks for all of the input
Click to expand...

you eliminated and blocked off the pcv valve, correct? If not, you're letting unmetered air in.
 

lancec2c30

Member
May 14, 2008
570
0
16
Washington
Jun 25, 2010
#8
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #8
On forced induction setups, fuel needs aren't the same as naturally aspirated.

In a simple injector calculator I entered the following.

450 crank horsepower
Max injector duty cycle at 85%
fuel pressure at 43psi

That comes out to a 39.9lb/hr injector with a BSFC of .60 (turbo application). So a 42 would be the closest safe choice.
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Jun 25, 2010
#9
  • Jun 25, 2010
  • #9
With my experiences mechanics no nothing about high performance. Now thats a broad statement, but Ive talked to ASE mastertechs that had no idea what I was talking about when it comes to AFR and whats lean and whats fat etc. On a NA car hell you can run it up to 13.1 AFR and higher, on a boosted car that ratio will destroy your motor. Id recommend at least a few runs on a dyno just to see what your AFR is. Itll prolly cost about 75 bucks for 3 runs but its a great starting point. Pull your plugs, see if you have any tips missing on them. Also if there white that will indicate a lean condition. If you have missing tips on your plugs, your detonating!!!
 
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 28, 2010
#10
  • Jun 28, 2010
  • #10
ok so i drove my car this weekend and after any hour of running i didnt have any white some anymore!!!! Is it possible that what my mechanic said about the condensation was right? Thanks for all of the help guys im starting to price some 60Lbs for my car to expand but there so darn expensive, so ill have to save up. Thanks everyone for the help P.S.what would i need to do to run a catch can? What are the advantages?
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Jun 28, 2010
#11
  • Jun 28, 2010
  • #11
Just so you know 60lbers are useless with stock lines and rails. Stock lines and rails only support up to 50lb injectors!!! Havin fun yet??? LOL
 
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 28, 2010
#12
  • Jun 28, 2010
  • #12
Great!!! good to know lol So how big if lines would i need to run? So im guessing that you will run braided steel lines all the way? Also i want to ask i have a fmu that i put on my car and talking to poeple they say that i dont need it but i really have no idea. If i dont please let me know cuz i dont like the looks of it lol Thanks I see that u run outt fuel at 5500 rpm lol thats crazy. I think im going to redo my motor and then call it quits on this car but that will be down the road when i have more money. Thanks for all the help Kdubslugga
 

Pod

Member
Aug 17, 2003
71
0
6
Cambridge, UK
Jun 28, 2010
#13
  • Jun 28, 2010
  • #13
Drews93fox said:
but i really have no idea.
Click to expand...

It sounds like the best idea is dyno time to find out exactly what state it's in now, before deciding what to buy next.
 
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 29, 2010
#14
  • Jun 29, 2010
  • #14
Pod said:
It sounds like the best idea is dyno time to find out exactly what state it's in now, before deciding what to buy next.
Click to expand...


I agree with that the only problem i s i have to travel at least 3 hours to get to a dyno shop
If i get the moates quarterhorse could i do everything i need to do in a tuning since? I do have a guy 30 min away that could dyno my car he just doesn't have the software to change anything on my stock computer.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 29, 2010
#15
  • Jun 29, 2010
  • #15
The 30's should be fine, running stock heads and a stock intake he isnt making **** for power no matter how many turbos are under the hood. Keep the injectors the way they are and get a wideband with the money you would have used for the injectors. Its a good gauge to have and really cheap insurance in the grand scheme.

I would guess your motor isnt making a whole lot over 300 at the tire with all the stock parts and the low boost, and if i had to put money on it i would say that the white smoke is from a blown head gasket that is seeping a little coolant into the cylinders, and burning off in the chambers, thats why your not seeing it in the oil.

good luck, welcome to forced induction
 
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 29, 2010
#16
  • Jun 29, 2010
  • #16
Thats what I thought for HP and I am going to get a wideband its needed.

The thing about the head gaskets is i just changed them. Maybe i did something wrong and it seeped a little. And the smoke is now gone, I think that the prob was when i did blow a head gasket i had antifreeze in the exhaust and i think that it was just burning it up because now it gone.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 29, 2010
#17
  • Jun 29, 2010
  • #17
prob wouldnt be a bad idea to re torque the heads. Did you use new bolts?
 
D

Drews93fox

Member
Feb 22, 2010
140
0
17
Danville, Iowa
Jun 29, 2010
#18
  • Jun 29, 2010
  • #18
Well I torqued them down at 73lbs and i used new bolts but i didn't use arp studs tho. When i get a chance i think that i will re torque them and replace with some arps or something of that kind. Thanks for the help
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 29, 2010
#19
  • Jun 29, 2010
  • #19
if you remove them one at a time you could probly sneak studs in there without removing the heads, but before doing that i would drain the water out of the block because the bottom holes go into water....

now that i say that, did you use any kind of sealer on the lower bolts? that could cause water seepage if you didnt and may explain the white smoke. When i did studs on my stock block i used pipe dope on the lower holes in the block to seal them up
 
M

machuginah

New Member
Jun 29, 2010
6
0
0
Jun 29, 2010
#20
  • Jun 29, 2010
  • #20
No way are 30s too big, if anything they are too small for that setup
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
177
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
237
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
996
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
J
Fuel Fuel Pressure Issue
  • justadude07
  • May 12, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
393
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 12, 2025
justadude07
J
8
Foxbody high rpms and surging rpms
  • 86foxseth
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
168
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 13, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?