• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Awesome article in Engine Masters (built 331)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FastDriver
  • Start date Start date Dec 25, 2009

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,065
2,670
224
Vass, NC
Dec 25, 2009
#1
  • Dec 25, 2009
  • #1
I thought you guys might enjoy reading about it. Unfortunately, I don't have my scanner, because I just moved to Germany.

When I get it, I'll post the article on my magazine articles thread.

Basically this is the combo and how it did:

- '65 302 block
- Crankshaft: RPM international steel 3.250" (low-buck), but reworked with a grind (counterweights, maybe?), nitride hardening, and custom lightening
- Clevite bearings
- FPS main support
- ARP studs
- 5.400 inch 2.100" journal RPM rods
- coated Ross pistons (5cc domes) 11.8:1 static compression
- Mahle rings
- Solid roller camshaft (256*@.050 & .640 gross lift, 108* LSA, installed at 103*)
- Isky Red Zone solid roller lifters with EZ roller option (no needle rollers)
- Comp ultra pro magnum steel rockers on ARP studs and a PRW girdle
custom 5/16" Smith Brothers pushrods w/ .116" hardened walls
- AFR 205 Eliminator heads with custom porting & 59cc combustion chambers (Are eliminators the nitrous version with bigger exhaust ports?)
- MLS gaskets
- 1.550" valve springs w/ 278lbs seat load and 704lbs open load
- Parker funnel-web intake
- Carbeurator: Dr. J's custom 4150 (no info on this... don't know what this is)

I really liked this combination of parts, and though I already knew what hp it would make (it was on the cover), I was really interested to see where it made power.

Peak torque came at 5600 RPM: 427 lb-ft
Peak power came at the max RPM they took the motor to: 543hp@7300 rpm

They added a Zex nitrous plate with a 150 shot and picked up another 180hp@7200 rpm bringing it to 743hp total!

I thought this was super impressive. I also brought out last quarter's magazine (they don't come monthly) for comparison with a 5.4L-based modular that was built for N/A power. The modular was actually bored for a total of 358c.i. and made 577hp @6400 rpm at 12.5:1 static compression with mild cams. I think the 331 would've matched the 358 in peak power numbers with a milder cam, or if they'd built it with a dart block and let it turn what it really wanted to, I bet that it'd be an 8000+ RPM shift motor that made peak power closer to 7600-7800 rpm.

Just wanted to let you guys in on this article. I think engine masters is becoming my favorite car magazine. Finally a magazine that goes into all the details in the build instead of glossing over the interesting stuff.

Chris
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Dec 25, 2009
#2
  • Dec 25, 2009
  • #2
I love Engine Masters, it's my favorite magazine. I saw this nitrous small block article a few weeks back. I remember wondering how the hell they are keeping a stock production 302 block together at 743 horsepower...
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,065
2,670
224
Vass, NC
Dec 25, 2009
#3
  • Dec 25, 2009
  • #3
Yeah, no kidding. It's impressive. They explained that a little. The older early 70s and 60s small blocks had more webbing in the mains than the late-model 302 HO blocks. They said not as much as the mexicans, though. High hp, high RPM block... That's a recipe for disaster, though. I wouldn't be surprised if this block eventually comes apart, though.
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Dec 25, 2009
#4
  • Dec 25, 2009
  • #4
Yeah, I'd expect it to unzip at the mains on a big nitrous hit. The fact that it lives on a dyno and doesn't have a ton of accessories loading on it probably helps I guess.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 25, 2009
#5
  • Dec 25, 2009
  • #5
Chris, I agree with you on this being one of the best car mags out there. The writers seem to actually know wtf they are talking about, and its not stuffed to the gills with shameless advertising.

That said, the little 331 was badddd ass, was it not? I did feel like they skirted around the topic of block durability, though. 60s block or not, that thing isn't going to last long the way they plan to use it.

I was actually most interested in the junkyard SBC they did either in that issue or the one before, I can't remember. IIRC, they made 450hp with some dirt cheap parts, and used a lot of go-fast techniques that could be used in any engine. That Mod motor build was certainly impressive, but not everyone has the coin for such a build, which is why I dig the junkyard stuff more.
 

rdharper02

like kicking myself in the junk
10 Year Member
May 8, 2006
703
237
84
Dec 26, 2009
#6
  • Dec 26, 2009
  • #6
Great article, logevity of the block and (if I recall correctly) the solid lifters concern me. Might be a nice one with a better block and some lifters that dont require constant checking.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,065
2,670
224
Vass, NC
Dec 26, 2009
#7
  • Dec 26, 2009
  • #7
NikwoaC said:
Chris, I agree with you on this being one of the best car mags out there. The writers seem to actually know wtf they are talking about, and its not stuffed to the gills with shameless advertising.

That said, the little 331 was badddd ass, was it not? I did feel like they skirted around the topic of block durability, though. 60s block or not, that thing isn't going to last long the way they plan to use it.

I was actually most interested in the junkyard SBC they did either in that issue or the one before, I can't remember. IIRC, they made 450hp with some dirt cheap parts, and used a lot of go-fast techniques that could be used in any engine. That Mod motor build was certainly impressive, but not everyone has the coin for such a build, which is why I dig the junkyard stuff more.
Click to expand...

Yeah, same magazine. I read it, too. 447hp from a chevy 350 with a stock bottom end. They just refreshened the engine's rings, bearings, seals, etc... They bought all shelf components - no junkyard stuff - and made that kinda power, which I thought was very impressive. We're talking a 380-400rwhp street badass for next to nothing. That's pretty good considering you can't buy and build an LS1 or really any other motor for that. I don't think I could personally piece together a 302 that would do that for the same amount of money. Do you?

For that money, you'd need a 347, which would cost quite a bit just for the internals even if you could find a 302HO for next to nothing - my brother's last 302 shortblock cost him $50.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 26, 2009
#8
  • Dec 26, 2009
  • #8
FastDriver said:
Yeah, same magazine. I read it, too. 447hp from a chevy 350 with a stock bottom end. They just refreshened the engine's rings, bearings, seals, etc... They bought all shelf components - no junkyard stuff - and made that kinda power, which I thought was very impressive. We're talking a 380-400rwhp street badass for next to nothing. That's pretty good considering you can't buy and build an LS1 or really any other motor for that. I don't think I could personally piece together a 302 that would do that for the same amount of money. Do you?

For that money, you'd need a 347, which would cost quite a bit just for the internals even if you could find a 302HO for next to nothing - my brother's last 302 shortblock cost him $50.
Click to expand...

A 302? No. A 351W? Hell yes you could. Might still cost more, though. Chevy parts are just so damn cheap!
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,065
2,670
224
Vass, NC
Dec 26, 2009
#9
  • Dec 26, 2009
  • #9
very good point. I don't know why I'm so closed minded... I guess I just love the 302s...

Still, a 351 I actually think it could be done for the same amount of money... especially a 351C
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Dec 26, 2009
#10
  • Dec 26, 2009
  • #10
thats a great mag, and i really liked the article right after with the guy from applied nitrous technologies(i think thats who it was). That guy really knows his stuff with juice. A friend i know with a shop built a BBC for a customer and they basically built the whole motor with that same guys guidance and i guess it made within 20hp of his predictions on motor and within 10 on the spray. He knows his stuff i'd say
 

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Dec 27, 2009
#11
  • Dec 27, 2009
  • #11
90lxcoupe said:
thats a great mag, and i really liked the article right after with the guy from applied nitrous technologies(i think thats who it was). That guy really knows his stuff with juice. A friend i know with a shop built a BBC for a customer and they basically built the whole motor with that same guys guidance and i guess it made within 20hp of his predictions on motor and within 10 on the spray. He knows his stuff i'd say
Click to expand...

I enjoyed that article/interview also. He really knows his stuff when it comes to nitrous.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 27, 2009
#12
  • Dec 27, 2009
  • #12
Posted via Mobile Device i could be wrong but wasn't it a 289 block? Still that's a pretty rowdy engine. I showed it to a chevy friend and he just shook his head and called it a dyno queen lol.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,065
2,670
224
Vass, NC
Dec 27, 2009
#13
  • Dec 27, 2009
  • #13
The old 302s and 289s used the same block. So, both answers would be correct.
 
R

red94stanggt

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
3
0
0
Dec 27, 2009
#14
  • Dec 27, 2009
  • #14
MMM I love reading the specifics of an engine.... I'm still young and don't know too much about this mag. I may have to check it out and give them some of my money... I was just day dreaming about building a high comp, 351 based, turbo motor to run on E85. Daily driven, good mileage, big power when you get into boost.... mmmmm
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,065
2,670
224
Vass, NC
Dec 27, 2009
#15
  • Dec 27, 2009
  • #15
That's a motor I'd love to see, red!
 
R

red94stanggt

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
3
0
0
Dec 27, 2009
#16
  • Dec 27, 2009
  • #16
Hopefully when I get out of school this year I can get back into stangbanging. We have plenty of stations with E85 here in the midwest. I feel like a little kid at christmas just talking about it LOL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
689
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
For Sale 97 Cobra with built 99 cobra drivetrain
  • AvalancheSVT
  • May 14, 2022
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 22, 2022
AvalancheSVT
D
Stock block or?
  • Deleted member 215073
  • Nov 18, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 22, 2019
revhead347
R
For Sale 2000 Mustang Turbo 6 speed
  • rdwyellowguy
  • May 28, 2020
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 5, 2020
rdwyellowguy
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?