• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

BBk Equal Length Headers Don't Fit

  • Thread starter Thread starter MoNkEyMaN912
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2009
M

MoNkEyMaN912

New Member
May 27, 2009
9
0
0
Fort Drum NY
May 27, 2009
#1
  • May 27, 2009
  • #1
I've had the Chrome finish which was a bad idea but they did fit just rusted after like 4 yrs so I decided to get the same ones since they fit except I went the ceramic coat but for whatever reason these don't fit. I've dented the heck out of hit trying to get it to clear the steering shaft no luck so I bought the flaming River steering shaft that is supposed to give better header clearance no luck there either I'm using Mr.Gasket copper gaskets. Can header gaskets really make that much of a difference? Jegs and summit both said that they should fit with stock motor ive got Edelbrock performer heads but the old ones fit why won't these fit? Anybody else have these problems?
 

1995GTStang

New Member
Feb 9, 2009
74
0
0
Washington State
May 27, 2009
#2
  • May 27, 2009
  • #2
I just ordered a set of BBK shorties #1525. I was told it was just the equal length ones will not work because of the tubes extend too far out and cause issues.

I do not know much about the equal length headers, did you compare the two to see if there is any difference in they were they made??
 

MotiV8ed_95GT

Member
Dec 3, 1998
57
0
7
Monkton, MD
May 27, 2009
#3
  • May 27, 2009
  • #3
Check your motor mounts, if they are sagging at all that will give you issues with your steering shaft clearance.

Ross
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
May 28, 2009
#4
  • May 28, 2009
  • #4
I have the BBK E/L ceramic coated headers. No fitment problems here.

Maybe the ones you got were for Fox Mustangs
I would check the part number and make sure it is for the 94-95 years.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
May 28, 2009
#5
  • May 28, 2009
  • #5
i agree with both Ross and Joe. start by checking the to make sure you got the right headers. then replace your motor mounts, if they are stock they could probably use it anyway.
 
M

MoNkEyMaN912

New Member
May 27, 2009
9
0
0
Fort Drum NY
May 28, 2009
#6
  • May 28, 2009
  • #6
1995GTStang Yeah i Checked the difference didn't look like anything was different about them I have heard that it could be the motor mounts i'm gonna get another set on order and this time save the reciept incase this happens again because i've jacked this set up trying to make it fit. Motor mounts could use a new set which would anybody recomend? OEM or the stiffer ones?
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
May 28, 2009
#7
  • May 28, 2009
  • #7
You could just get OEM motor mounts, but I would get some poly urethene mounts. Might as well up grade while you are replacing them.

On the subject of the equal length headers, they only issue I had when I installed mine was the dip stick. After a slight "modification" to the stick, they fit just fine.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
May 30, 2009
#8
  • May 30, 2009
  • #8
i hated my BBK EL headers. all they did was burn spark plug wires and make it really difficult to get to the plugs. imo, they were not even close to worth it
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
May 30, 2009
#9
  • May 30, 2009
  • #9
yea... i vote to sell them and get long tubes....
 
M

MoNkEyMaN912

New Member
May 27, 2009
9
0
0
Fort Drum NY
May 31, 2009
#10
  • May 31, 2009
  • #10
earleys94gt said:
You could just get OEM motor mounts, but I would get some poly urethene mounts. Might as well up grade while you are replacing them.

On the subject of the equal length headers, they only issue I had when I installed mine was the dip stick. After a slight "modification" to the stick, they fit just fine.
Click to expand...

it's gotta be my motor mounts or the wrong headers but i called jegs and BBK and they both said the part number was right icompared the looks from my olds ones (that fit) to the new ones they looked the same but not a fit. So go with poly urethene mounts are they a pain in the but to install? i've put them in on some cars and swore that i would never put another set in .............lol
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 31, 2009
#11
  • May 31, 2009
  • #11
If you are gonna get another set of shortys .........

I'd do the regular shorty header over the equal length

There is not gonna be much difference ... if any ... between them

I don't know what the long term plans for your Stang are
but
LT's can yield a noticable gain over shortys down low and at mid range

Might think a bit long term before you part with the cash

Grady
 
M

MoNkEyMaN912

New Member
May 27, 2009
9
0
0
Fort Drum NY
May 31, 2009
#12
  • May 31, 2009
  • #12
Grady What type of headers are you running? I would like to go with long tube right now can't do it because i will have to change out all of my pipes but for future what's your opinion one the best brand?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 31, 2009
#13
  • May 31, 2009
  • #13
I run Mac LT's and one of their catted H mid pipes

You see a lot of peeps run Mac and BBK LT's

I'd bet there is not much if any difference between em when talking
performance

Some like the fact BBK uses a solid flange

I went with Mac simply because when I put my sig combo together
BBK did not offer an egr bung at that time

Yes ... when one moves away from shorty to LT's they do have to
commit to a different mid pipe

however

Depending upon application............

LT's can offer substantial benefits that you just can't get with shortys

Grady
 
M

MoNkEyMaN912

New Member
May 27, 2009
9
0
0
Fort Drum NY
Jun 1, 2009
#14
  • Jun 1, 2009
  • #14
Grady Thanks for your healp instead of goin with shortys i may just wait and go with lt and get a different mid pipe did you have any fitment issues?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 1, 2009
#15
  • Jun 1, 2009
  • #15
MoNkEyMaN912 said:
Grady Thanks for your healp instead of goin with shortys i may just wait and go with lt and get a different mid pipe did you have any fitment issues?
Click to expand...

None what so ever

I would point out my application is with a stick trans (t-5)

I do wanna say

If you're planning on just a bolt on or two ......
shortys would not be all that much of a compromise

but

If staying NA and doing h/c/i ... Yes ... LT's would be the way to go

Grady
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
A
1991 5.0 with HCI - started car, running for a few minutes, started pushing coolant into the overflow tank and then puking out from there. I'm lost
  • AmericanMuscle4.6GT
  • Oct 16, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 30, 2022
CAMTWO1070
SOLD For Sale 92 Mustang Notchback Complete Rebuild in 2019
  • pearlnotchback
  • Jun 21, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
9
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 24, 2021
Steel1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?