• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Because the most advisable not to work for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luis911
  • Start date Start date Jan 6, 2008

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
Jan 6, 2008
#1
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #1
My mustang has only porting heads and compression of 130 lbs. I read a lot of information and come to the conclusion that for a stock engine the best values are:
Timing = 13 to 16 degrees
Spark plug = ASF42C or similar copper
Gap = .045

Because my best performance is with the following values?
Timing : 22 to 25 degrees
Spark plug = Champion BL15Y
Gap = .030 to .033
 

87foxstang

Member
May 10, 2007
0
0
16
Cromwell, CT
Jan 6, 2008
#2
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #2
hey whatever works...is that on 93 octane i presume
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Jan 6, 2008
#3
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #3
Luis911 said:
My mustang has only porting heads and compression of 130 lbs. I read a lot of information and come to the conclusion that for a stock engine the best values are:
Timing = 13 to 16 degrees
Spark plug = ASF42C or similar copper
Gap = .045

Because my best performance is with the following values?
Timing : 22 to 25 degrees
Spark plug = Champion BL15Y
Gap = .030 to 0.33
Click to expand...

My guess is that your balancer has 'slipped' and you are not really running 25 degrees. Very common problem with the factory balancers.
 

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
Jan 6, 2008
#4
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #4
87foxstang said:
hey whatever works...is that on 93 octane i presume
Click to expand...

I tested with 87 and 91 octane, 91 octane improvement but a combination of the spark plugs asfc42c with 91 octane is poor compared to 87 or 91 octane and spark plugs bly15
 

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
Jan 6, 2008
#5
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #5
NKau said:
My guess is that your balancer has 'slipped' and you are not really running 25 degrees. Very common problem with the factory balancers.
Click to expand...
Started to try to 10 degrees, the indictment was felt with little power to raise grades was more powerful, 2 weeks ago I went to the extreme and put him as 26 degrees. He moved Timebase IAC and use the value of 0,985 V, the scanner I was unable to remove the error 12 because RPM are as 950, below is not maintained and has low compression cylinder 5 of 122 lbs.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jan 6, 2008
#6
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #6
did you unplug the SPOUT when adjusting timing.

i dont see how anyone could run 15 degrees advance over stock. thats just too much even with good gas. if the engine is old i wouldnt hesitate to say the balancer has indeed slipped.
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Jan 6, 2008
#7
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #7
yeah 25* doesnt seem right. like said above i'd check the balancer,make sure the spout is out, and check the timing pointer also. it could also just be your timing light. maybe try with a different one?

i'm running 17* on 87 octane, and i'm sure that is too much, but can't for the life of me figure out why it's high. i have a newer balancer, engine was recently rebuilt. timing pointer seems fine. i just stopped worrying about it a while ago. i can still take accurate timing measurements, its just that they all seem to be a couple degrees high.

when keeping the same timing (if set properly), increasing octane will actually cause a loss of power. higher octane fuel is only used so you can increase your timing (without pinging), which is where the gains will come from.
 

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
Jan 6, 2008
#8
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #8
Foxfan88 said:
did you unplug the SPOUT when adjusting timing.

i dont see how anyone could run 15 degrees advance over stock. thats just too much even with good gas. if the engine is old i wouldnt hesitate to say the balancer has indeed slipped.
Click to expand...

Disconnect the spout to make the test of timing and the engine was hot. Before already adjusted the time and left him marked up to 10 degrees, 1 month ago to buy a lamp craftsman and I checked the time with different combinations.
The car I bought 2 years ago and the previous owner told me that I had the porting heads, larger injectors and engine 351 (not told the truth) I check and the injectors are stock at 19 lbs and the engine is 302 (HO), I do not know how to verify whether heads are porting
I do not know if the car has something different and therefore the standards do not apply in my case, and according to the original 1981 engine, and make sure your head is E7TE.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 6, 2008
#9
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #9
if your car is a 1981 it should have E5 heads and a carburator.
 

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
Jan 6, 2008
#10
  • Jan 6, 2008
  • #10
stykthyn said:
if your car is a 1981 it should have E5 heads and a carburator.
Click to expand...
Mustang 1981, conver. ext. 1990 and int. 1987 EFI 5.0 H.O. 5vel. + rev. MAP, ported head, rear 245/45 17", front 235/45 17"
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 7, 2008
#11
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #11
I would run 89 octane and Autolite 25's gapped to .045 with 20 degrees of timing
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 7, 2008
#12
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #12
Autolite 25s, .45 gap, 14* here.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 7, 2008
#13
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #13
85 that "Super Mullet" pic is killing me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 7, 2008
#14
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #14
PUNISHER RACING said:
85 that "Super Mullet" pic is killing me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...



ROCK OF AAGEEESS!! STIIIIILL ROOOOOLLIIINN!! ROCK ROOOOOLLLIIIIIINNN!!!!!
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 8, 2008
#15
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #15
DEF LEPPARD!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Bad Vibration at 2000-3000RPM
  • Rona
  • Apr 16, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2023
85GTStangGuy
H
'86 New Turbo Build First Start/Idle Trouble. Full Tune specs attached
  • Heffay
  • Jul 10, 2022
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 12, 2022
Heffay
H
ANY HELP IS APPRECIATED 1988 mustang gt
  • Foxbody1988
  • Dec 23, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2019
General karthief
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
D
Electrical 93 5.0 LX Code 18 SPOUT in Issues
  • DOHCobra
  • Sep 19, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2024
thinkfaster
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?