• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Beggars can't be choosers...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shirley
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Sep 30, 2005
#21
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #21
Shirley said:
i think I am gonna go h/c/i, address the transmission, and finish the rearend and suspension. I think that will tide me over until I really want to get serious. I am looking for a mid to low twelve streetable cardaily driven car.
Click to expand...



a HCI mustang with gears and tires will run mid 12s. With slicks and ice down the manifold you should hit low 12s. 5.0s are fast people just underestimate them N/A.
 

old_blue

15 Year Member
Nov 3, 2003
1,783
282
124
Sep 30, 2005
#22
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #22
Dbeck- your avatar is freakin sick man LOL

I plan on running N/A as well. Not sure on the heads though, I am cheap so thumpers will probably be on the line as well as a tmoss ported intake (cobra/gt40) and a trick flow cam. Now I just gotta finish my 5 lug conversion and get money for the H/C/I. Then more money for after I blow the motor for having too much fun with the new mods.

Honestly though, it seems you want to have something more SOTP right away. I would say get 4.10s and then add a H/C/I as you get the $$$. But like everyone says you need to decide if you wanna run n/a or boosted. then you can decide on the other upgrades.. Good luck
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Oct 1, 2005
#23
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #23
Modular2v said:
there is no reason why you couldnt use c clip eliminator on the street! i did it for two years
Click to expand...

srothfuss said:
As for the C-clip thing... I think we recently debated this, and I still say there is nothing wrong with getting rid of the c-clips on a street car.
Click to expand...

88gt said:
Not be arguementitive, but, if rears w/o c-clips (pressed-on bearings at the axle flanges) is a bad idea....why are there so many 9 inch rears out there on daily driven cars? need more input please?
Click to expand...

OK, I found the c-clip eliminator article "The C-Clip Fallacy". Mustang Enthusiast, May '05. Written by Chris Hemer sourcing Randys Ring & Pinion, who I'm sure knows more about this than any of us. Anyway:

According to RR&P tech marketing specialist Jim McMillan, less than 1% of all vehicles with c-clips have had them fail. He says that c-clip eliminators were never intended to increase strength, nor are they designed for street use. They are simply for safety, in the unlikely event that a heavy side impact (like hitting a wall at the track) could cause c-clip failure, which could cause the loss of an axle shaft at high speed sending a car into the stands. It has nothing to do with power levels, you won't break c-clips with a supercharger, you'll break them by crashing. Furthurmore,
"The bearings used in c-clip eliminator kits are the small, ball bearing variety that aren't well suited to long duty cycles or carrying heavy loads. They have a life expectancy of three to five thousand miles, which is plenty on a drag car- but nothing on a street car. Over time, the seals break down and they start to leak oil, which can eventually saturate your rear brakes and cause deterioration of braking performance."
Which leads into the comment/question about 9" rears- a Ford 9" is not the same as an 8.8" with c-clip eliminators. They use a larger, far superior tapered Torrington bearing, which should last hundreds of thousands of miles. A far better (and allegedly cheaper) method of insuring yourself against losing an axle in an 8.8 is to simply weld 9" housing ends on it and use the 9" Torrington bearings. Incidently, using 9" parts on your 8.8" will make it stronger, not just safer. Again- c-clip eliminators don't "beef up" your rear any more than a driveshaft loop makes your driveshaft stronger. They aren't typically required by sanctioning bodies above the 8 or 9 second "street" bracket, and it's a non- reversable process. If your making enough power to go that fast, you should have a 9" or seriously worked over 8.8 with 9" parts already, therefore you probably never needed them to begin with. The summery is this:
"In short, there are planty of aftermarket part you can put on your car to make it faster, safer and better. Don't waste your time or money on c-clip eliminators unless they are required by the sanctioning body you run in."
In other works, on a daily driver that doesn't even go to the track (regardless of power level), there is no reason to screw up a perfectly good rear with them at all.
 

Must-Be-A-Stang

New Member
Sep 26, 2004
66
0
0
Enid Oklahoma
Oct 1, 2005
#24
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #24
Dbeck002 - How much did your set up cost??
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Oct 1, 2005
#25
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #25
Must-Be-A-Stang said:
Dbeck002 - How much did your set up cost??
Click to expand...



The heads were 1250.
Roller rockers were 200.
Lifters 120.
Fuel pump 130.
Cam 130.
Pushrods 60.
Intake was 240 from ebay.
Headgaskets were 50 i think.
ARP headbolts 80.
Comp cams timing chain 40.
Assembly lube, thread sealers, Anti seize, threadlocker, RTV etc... 50
Other gaskets - 50


about 2450.

Compare that with the track heat kit and it comes out about the same price because youll need to buy bolts, chemicals, lifters and a fuel pump with any headswap.

Hope this helps.
 

1EVIL88VERT

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
314
0
0
Dyess AFB, TX
Oct 1, 2005
#26
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #26
thats some good info on the c-clips stangbear
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Oct 1, 2005
#27
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #27
Sorry it took so long to dig it up.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
533
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 2:38 PM
joeybuddy96
J
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
147
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Tuesday at 3:59 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
105
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- 59 minutes ago
Willybill32
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
607
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
562
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?