• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Boss 302 Vs 82 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter FiveOFiveO
  • Start date Start date Aug 29, 2013

FiveOFiveO

New Member
Aug 4, 2013
9
0
2
Roanoke, Indiana
Aug 29, 2013
#1
  • Aug 29, 2013
  • #1
I have found a 66 mustang that has a boss 302. I was wondering since this engine is not as common would i be able to find performance parts for it. My main question is which engine would it be easier to get 400-500 horsepower out of? and what would it require for the boss engine
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 29, 2013
#2
  • Aug 29, 2013
  • #2
Awesome find....those motors don't pop up every day. Basically is a 4 bolt heavy duty Windsor bottom end with Cleveland heads.

Around 10.5:1 comp stock and 290hp/290tq in 1971

What year is the Engine????

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,221
8,072
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Aug 30, 2013
#3
  • Aug 30, 2013
  • #3
is it realy a boss 302? i dont know how many times i have gone to look at a mustang with a boss 302 that turned out to be just a 289 or a regular 302.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Aug 30, 2013
#4
  • Aug 30, 2013
  • #4
get a pic first.You cannot confuse the two.
 
L

lord_cobra

Member
Sep 2, 2005
96
6
9
Aug 31, 2013
#5
  • Aug 31, 2013
  • #5
I would definitely stick with the Boss. Or at least give it to me if it is real.
 

FiveOFiveO

New Member
Aug 4, 2013
9
0
2
Roanoke, Indiana
Aug 31, 2013
#6
  • Aug 31, 2013
  • #6
if it turns out to be a boss which will be better to make power?
 

no1hedberg

Member
Aug 5, 2013
33
1
9
Sep 2, 2013
#7
  • Sep 2, 2013
  • #7
Real Boss 302s are exceedingly rare, and very expensive if you do find one. To answer your question, Boss 302s have huge ports and valves for 302 cubic inches. They have the potential to make tremendous high rpm horsepower, especially when compared to the anemic ports and valves in stock 302s. You can always invest in a good set of aftermarket aluminum cylinder heads trick flow or edelbrock and produce lots of power. It's very unlikely that its actually a Boss. If the valve covers look like 302/351W covers, you can pretty much assume the seller doesn't know what he's talking about. Here is a link to pics and info on the Boss 302. http://www.mustangandfords.com/tech...dentify_classic_ford_v8_engines/photo_11.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Engine 1970 302 boss block
  • TOM B
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
419
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jan 14, 2025
lqbbe
L
S
Is the BOSS 302 block oem compatible with the 95 302?
  • saf_blu302
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
417
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
A
Thinking of building a BOSS 302 bottom end and have some questions!
  • Angelq1028
  • Apr 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
367
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
TOOLOW91
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
813
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
857
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?