Rick 91GT said:I found better results with a stock box and regular cheap paper filter worked best..
Tried the cone K&N and the K&N panels as well...neither worked as good.
Insane3D said:Also, for the CAI guys, the stock airbox is a CAI...they take the air from the same place.
87mustang347 said:damnit!!! that sux cause i dont have the stock airbox. a buddy of mine has the c&l and hes using the long filter and not an air box and he says that it works perfect. i think its a 73mm tho. whats up with that?
You posted a question of why your car is so slow. I responded a little bit ago saying that this meter may be your problem.92BlackGT said:i have a 73mm one. Never had a problem. Yes it uses the stock sensor.
2000xp8 said:C&L's suck, i've seen it first hand many times.
If you want to chance running lean on a powerful engine that you have alot of money into go ahead it's your car.
You won't see most of the guy that run low 12's and faster using them. There's a reason for that.
Of course before everyone blows up about this, there is exceptions to the rule, and some cars actually run good with them. But they are inconsistant meters, meaning some cars run good, some don't. A pro m calibrated right always runs right there is no maybe about it.
2000xp8 said:C&L's suck, i've seen it first hand many times.
If you want to chance running lean on a powerful engine that you have alot of money into go ahead it's your car.
You won't see most of the guy that run low 12's and faster using them. There's a reason for that.
Of course before everyone blows up about this, there is exceptions to the rule, and some cars actually run good with them. But they are inconsistant meters, meaning some cars run good, some don't. A pro m calibrated right always runs right there is no maybe about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?