• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

cam suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19mustang65
  • Start date Start date Apr 6, 2005
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 6, 2005
#1
  • Apr 6, 2005
  • #1
what size cam would you guys suggest i put into my 65 coupe 289.
she is mildly built up.....030 over, 9.2:1 compression, flat top pistons, stock heads, comp cams roller(tips) rockers. the cam i have no is pretty small. i can get exact specs if need be.

im looking for pretty good performance but i want to be able to idle and not run like crap for around town driving.
 
R

Rapid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
297
1
0
Columbia, SC
Apr 7, 2005
#2
  • Apr 7, 2005
  • #2
I went with the Edelbrock cam that matches the rest of my Edelbrock stuff. Visit their website for suggestions. Look for a cam that has a range from idle to some RPM max. I did not see if you are running an auto but they need 112 degrees of lobe seperation for that good idle. Too litte here and you are looking at a stall converter.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Apr 7, 2005
#3
  • Apr 7, 2005
  • #3
I went with probably the same spec edelbrock cam as rapid mentioned above and also increased my stall to the 2200 range just in case.... it idles nicely and is very steetable. not too much, i could still easily run power brakes or whatever. there are many options out there though, it all depends.... id go with a stage 1 type of upgrade, just a little more wild than stock, if you want to keep all the niceness of the engine!
 
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 8, 2005
#4
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #4
what i have is pretty close to a stock cam. maybe a lil higher but i dont think its much at all. i have a c4. how much are stall converters anyways?
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Apr 8, 2005
#5
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #5
19mustang65 said:
what i have is pretty close to a stock cam. maybe a lil higher but i dont think its much at all. i have a c4. how much are stall converters anyways?
Click to expand...
Well it would help to know the specs on your cam. if you have a comp cams setup, i cant imagine its real close to stock. i think u must be looking for a little more than what i have. but to answer your other question, a converter can be cheap or expensive. mine was a tci unit costing 179.99 from jegs. but u can get them cheaper or more expensive depending on your needs.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Apr 8, 2005
#6
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #6
Off hand I do not recall the specs of the stock cam but I do remember being absolutely AMAZED at how tame it was. IIRC the duration was not even above 190 at 0.05 and the total lift was something along the lines of 0.400 or less!

The problem is while a nice powerful but easily streetable cam recomendation is easily made by us, it is going to suffer with those stock heads. I STRONGLY urge you to at least do a port match on them, particularly the exhaust port. The exhaust has been a problem with Ford heads since the '50s, the 260/289/302s, even the HO-5.0s and GT40s sucked in that department. On the 65-67 289 it is around a 1-inch square!

Spend a few hours with a hand held grinder that you can rent and a set of bits, for under $100 you can really free up some power and open up a range of cams that wpouldn't have worked well with the stock heads. But to answer your question, a cam with total duration in the 250-260 range, and 0.05 duration in the 210-215 range will wake it up nicely, add in a 0.45 lift and you shouldn't have to worry about piston to valve clearance. A cam like that will provide a broad power band, very low and smooth idle, tons of vacuum for accessories, yet still show itself when you ask for juice. The cam specs in my sig are pretty mild by a racer's standards but will not work well at all with stock heads. I'll have a slight lope at idle but enough vacuum at least for brakes, plus a very flat torque curve, with 375 or more ft/lbs all the way from 2,000-6,000RPM. In my opinion the torque curve is what you should pay attention to for a street car or cruiser.
 
6

65shlbycln

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
1,266
0
0
Atlanta
Apr 8, 2005
#7
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #7
i have a comp cam xe262h.

video. www.osanto.net/exhaust.avi
 
1

19mustang65

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
201
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Apr 8, 2005
#8
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #8
here are the specs for my cam

204I - 214E @ .050
.448I - .472E
 

Jonstantine

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
487
0
0
Oklahoma
Apr 9, 2005
#9
  • Apr 9, 2005
  • #9
just of note:
ive never been impressed with teh 1/4 mile times of street cars with the performer rpm cam

i think a good choice would be inbetween the performer and performer rpm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
275
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
945
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
R
please help 87 mustang megasquirt 2 idle problems
  • robbie5.0
  • Jun 2, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
452
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 18, 2025
tate302
T
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
909
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?