camaro vs. mustang

My sons step father just bought a 1978 camaro with automatic tranny and a 350 in it. He started bragging on how his car would beat my capri in a race. I said that mine would beat his. Now he wants to race. I dont because its not a mature thing to do since we are parents and could cause some problems. Anyways I was just wondering if he is right. What do you think is the faster car? Mine is a 1986 5.0 with gutted H pipe, flow masters, K&N air filter and I have a 5 speed tranny. I know my car is fast. It diffenitly hauls ass. Just want your opinions.
 
hemi_fan said:
You should destroy him... I raced my buddy's Iroc with a cammed 350, and a T5... the thing ran a 15.7s quarter against my 14.7... I know my 14.7 was slow... but dang, his car is a real dog. lol
wow somethings wrong there...if he has any decent cam he shouldnt be running high 15's




but yea a stock smogged 350 with low compression (8.5:1 i think) back in 78 probably made only 170 hp...of course you would win. im sure the mustang was slow back in 78 too is that Mustang II???
 
I not going to race him because it would cause issues. I know if I win I would cause some arguments between my ex and him. He likes to be the better man. If I loose I would never hear the end of it not just from him my son too.
 
I found this:


The late 70's were a very dark time for performance.
 
How in the hell do you make a 350 with only 175 hp? They prolly spent more time figuring out how to make a 50% VE engine, than they would have if they just figured out how to get better mileage!!