• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Camera savy people, come in please.

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhiteStallionGT
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2006

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 24, 2006
#1
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #1
My dad is getting this camera.

View attachment 460400

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/con...188&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation

We need a powerful lense. Kinda like the one my friend has that has 30x optical zoom. lol and we don't want to spend 300 bucks on one either. I have no clue when it comes to lenses. Any help would be awesome.
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Jun 24, 2006
#2
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #2
I dont know, but I want a rebel so bad

http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref...?search-alias=photo&keywords=canon rebel lens


looked there?
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 24, 2006
#3
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • #3
Mustangless said:
I dont know, but I want a rebel so bad

http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref...?search-alias=photo&keywords=canon rebel lens


looked there?
Click to expand...

Thanks!
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jun 25, 2006
#4
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #4
Wow, they have some good prices on those lenses.


I'd love to have that Rebel.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jun 25, 2006
#5
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #5
Stick with the Canon lenses if you can. You'll get very mixed results with the other brands. Sigma is ok too. I bought the XT with the stock 18-55mm lens and I'm looking at upgrading to the Canon EF 28-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS lens. 135mm isn't a ton of zoom but it's good for general use and the 28mm could be wider, but again, for general use, it's decent. Don't buy one of those 18-300mm things becuase the image quality suffers BIG TIME and there's way too much light-loss. If you don't mind changing lenses, just get the kit with the lens and buy a 70-200 IS for a really nice telephoto.

Just remember . . . cheap lenses are BAD. Even then stock lens really chokes the image quality this camera can produce!
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Jun 25, 2006
#6
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #6
Cool!
I always hear that the Canon cameras are the best though.
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Jun 25, 2006
#7
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #7
Pennywise2 said:
Cool!
I always hear that the Canon cameras are the best though.
Click to expand...
I like the rebels, but based on my experience with the non-SLR digital cameras, I would personally go for the Olympus Digital SLR because the consumer Olympus digi cams have much better white balance than the Canon ones, but that may have changed.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jun 25, 2006
#8
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #8
White balance is easy to correct though. Especially if the camera has RAW capability. I'd be more worried about lens and sensor aberrations like purple-fringing, color aliasing, bad color noise etc. whith a non-SLR camera.
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 25, 2006
#9
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #9
Zero Signal said:
Stick with the Canon lenses if you can. You'll get very mixed results with the other brands. Sigma is ok too. I bought the XT with the stock 18-55mm lens and I'm looking at upgrading to the Canon EF 28-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS lens. 135mm isn't a ton of zoom but it's good for general use and the 28mm could be wider, but again, for general use, it's decent. Don't buy one of those 18-300mm things becuase the image quality suffers BIG TIME and there's way too much light-loss. If you don't mind changing lenses, just get the kit with the lens and buy a 70-200 IS for a really nice telephoto.

Just remember . . . cheap lenses are BAD. Even then stock lens really chokes the image quality this camera can produce!
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info. man.

how's this one?
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jun 25, 2006
#10
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #10
Hard to tell, I've never seen that lens before. I would seriously try to get something that will go wider than 55mm though. You're max field of vision is going to be really narrow. It might be fine if all you want is the big zoom. It's hard to find info on the less popular lenses since nobody had written a review or posted samples from it.
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 25, 2006
#11
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #11
Ooops, I used the wrong link.

I meant to post this one. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0...=pd_bbs_1/002-8177334-7872840?ie=UTF8&s=photo

I know the 300mm is going to affect quality, but I want something with a powerful zoom, lol. This is equivalent to about 10x optical zoom correct?
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jun 26, 2006
#12
  • Jun 26, 2006
  • #12
That should be an ok lens. It will be tough to use though with it being a dark lens. With a big zoom like that, you want to be able to shoot the fastest shutter you can to avoid blurring from the camera shakes. The next up from the would be the 300mm IS version which is like $2k but with enough practice and maybe a unipod, you could probably pull off some good shots with it at full zoom. You'll just learn what the limits are with your lighting conditions.
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 28, 2006
#13
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #13
w00t just ordered it.

We decided to go with the black one. More professional looking, haha.

View attachment 459642
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jun 28, 2006
#14
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #14
Congrats! I wish I could get one of those.



We expect new pics of the car now!
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 28, 2006
#15
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #15
SeventyMach1 said:
Congrats! I wish I could get one of those.



We expect new pics of the car now!
Click to expand...

Thanks!

Most definitely there will be new pics of the car. Give me a week or so, lol.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jun 28, 2006
#16
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #16
Yeah I got the black body too Only bad part is that the front gets scratched up by fingernails easily, but it mostly rubs off. All it needs now is a battery grip to really make it look like you know what you're doing , but the batteries tend to last about 500 photos at least.

SO what lens did you get? The 70-300 or did you stick with the stock 18-55? If you got the 70-300, I'd really like to see some unedted pics from it!
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 29, 2006
#17
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #17
We decided to go with the Canon 70-200mm. We are going to get it at bestbuy because a friend of mine works there and he can get it for us for $150.

When I get them, I'll definitely take some unedited RAW shots and post them here.
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 29, 2006
#18
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #18
wow I'm a lucky sob. I just got this lens http://www.videodirect.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=EF28105.

It was a display lens at Circuit City and it is in perefect condition. How much I paid: $32 Retail: $180
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jun 29, 2006
#19
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #19
Hah, nice deal so you have two now?
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 30, 2006
#20
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #20
Yeah, as of right now. Just browsing around right now for the 300mm, trying to find a really good deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Hawaii 5-ohfox Official Progress Thread
  • tamadrummer88
  • Dec 29, 2013
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 23, 2014
Noobz347
  • Locked
Expired 89 Mustang GT 5.0 Convertible (31K original Miles) - DC/NOVA - $10K OBO
  • koala33
  • Apr 4, 2013
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
10K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 4, 2013
koala33
8
  • Locked
FS: 1993 LX 5.0 347 stroker reef blue/black int.
  • 87nitemare
  • Mar 9, 2010
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
18K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 19, 2010
87nitemare
8
camera camera
  • ZeroCool
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
4
Views
932
Regional Forums and Event Information Nov 14, 2004
ZeroCool
S
Why a dissapointment - I say the new Mustang is a winner!
  • sondesign
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
6K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 5, 2004
Jquintel
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?