• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

Cams ???s re: Comp Xtreme

  • Thread starter Thread starter tygr1
  • Start date Start date Dec 23, 2004

tygr1

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
318
0
0
SoCal
Dec 23, 2004
#1
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #1
Hey guys...looking into cams for the old 98. Comp cams offers one grind that sounds like a nice easy swap to me. Not too radical, no need for other mods, etc. I run 3:73s now, stock exhaust w/Flow 40s, turn downs, and a drop in K&N.

I'm not going for a 1/4 mile car here...more of a ramp-rocket/canyon carver. Therefore , I would like to get the most power possible, reasonably, on the stock N.A. setup, for getting off the corners (and outrunning the occasional 'Vette snobs). Would also consider a larger duration cam along with throttle body (and whatever else) changes if the gains are extraordinary.

I'm looking at the Comp Xtreme 'XER' series, stock no. 249-106300, model no. XE 262 AH - 114. Duration at .050" = 226*/224* with lifts of .475"/.450".

I'm looking here for some experience, possible HP and TQ numbers with this combo, and/or any other comments, opinions, advice concerning HP gains through CAMSHAFT selection please (I like my 3:73s, thank you very much).

Much thanks, once again!

P.S I'm in Cal, so need to keep exhaust legal...for now...moving to Texas (San Antonio) next year
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 24, 2004
#2
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #2
Get VT cams they give awesome results.
 

GoBabyVroommm

Active Member
Mar 22, 2003
1,156
0
36
Chicago, For Realss???!!!
Dec 24, 2004
#3
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #3
VT doesn't make cams for the 4vs.

As for your cams its a waste of time IMO. I was going to order my cams Monday till i did some research.

On a N/A set up your looking about 18-25 rwhp. But you have to buy springs, "32"valves, followers, etc... Basicaly at the end of the day you are doing a head job for something your barely going to feel. But if you want to do it FR500 cams comes with everything you need for $1300 dollars. Give you 18-20 rwhp and torque.

Sure you'll be able to rev to 7500rpm but what does it matter if you don't have the power to push.

Now if you have nitirous, blower, turbo then cams is something to look into. I'm not saying don't do it, i'm saying i wouldn't do it.

As for a 114lbs cam you'll barely hear that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine What Cam? 289
  • 65FBE2
  • Sep 8, 2012
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
12K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 3, 2013
clement
cam choices. best for n/a 2v?
  • fiveoho
  • Nov 16, 2010
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
31K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 8, 2010
Flghtmstr1
Cams! (valve event timing, resonance tuning, what's theory, what's fact)
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 27, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 27, 2011
NIKwoaC
L
F-cam vs Comp xe270hr-14
  • Lunch Box
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
10K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2008
Lunch Box
L
Anyone using Comp Cams "High Energy" 268H?
  • 84convertablegt
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
11
Views
33K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 20, 2008
84convertablegt
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?