• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Can you give me the low down on aluminum heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjl95mustang
  • Start date Start date Jun 15, 2004

bjl95mustang

Founding Member
Jan 18, 2000
1,495
0
36
Austin,TX
Jun 15, 2004
#1
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #1
I'm getting a rebuilt sb this summer and I have been looking for heads. I have seen iron heads for around $250-400 and aluminum gt40y for $600 and edelbrock's for $700. How much better are the edelbrock heads that these other heads besieds the weight?
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jun 15, 2004
#2
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #2
should have bigger intake/exhaust ports bigger springs so you can run a bigger cam. you cant even compare gt-40's to edelbrock period.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jun 15, 2004
#3
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #3
aluminum heads are going to flow a lot more than iron heads period. but they are also more succeptable to warping if you overheat the motor
 

bjl95mustang

Founding Member
Jan 18, 2000
1,495
0
36
Austin,TX
Jun 15, 2004
#4
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #4
Well i just talked to my local machine shop and he is going to look at them for free to see if the heads are level and good.
 
H

Horsepower67

New Member
Feb 1, 2004
62
0
0
Jun 15, 2004
#5
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #5
I prefer aluminum in general, but aware that your effective compression ratio will drop with thew aluminum heads, unless you go with a slightly smaller combustion chamber. This happens because aluminum cools so much faster than irom. This is also why you can run 11:1 compression on the street with aluminum heads pretty easily.
Basically, be careful, you could actually lose some TQ&HP if you don't pick the right set-up.
 

bjl95mustang

Founding Member
Jan 18, 2000
1,495
0
36
Austin,TX
Jun 15, 2004
#6
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #6
I think they have allready been milled.
 

SuperStang83

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2001
1,693
0
49
Boyertown, Pa
Jun 15, 2004
#7
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #7
Go with aluminum. I think they are worth the extra price I weight alone!
 

warmdye

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2000
482
0
0
Out in the Desert
Jun 15, 2004
#8
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #8
ECU5.0 said:
aluminum heads are going to flow a lot more than iron heads period. but they are also more succeptable to warping if you overheat the motor
Click to expand...

How do you come to this conclusion? Flowrate is a function of port size not material of construction. You can port an iron head just as big as an aluminum head. The surface smoothness of the material would have an effect on flow also but it seems to me that aluminum and cast iron would have about the same smoothness and if not you can always sand em down and polish them. What gives?
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jun 15, 2004
#9
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #9
warmdye said:
How do you come to this conclusion? Flowrate is a function of port size not material of construction. You can port an iron head just as big as an aluminum head. The surface smoothness of the material would have an effect on flow also but it seems to me that aluminum and cast iron would have about the same smoothness and if not you can always sand em down and polish them. What gives?
Click to expand...


You're right but I think he meant that most, if not all, of the better heads are aluminum. At least, I hope that what he meant.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jun 15, 2004
#10
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #10
I agree with QDRHRSE as to what I think ecu meant (boy, we are makin' stuff up). Notwithstanding the debate about the relative strengths and challenges, the simple fact is that the majority of folks who pursue aftermarket heads end up buying aluminum. So the market has shifted that way - you have many more choices in aluminum. At the end of the end of the day, I think all the strengths and challenges are a wash except for one. You simply can't knock 50 lbs. off the front of the car with cast iron heads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
858
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
961
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
594
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
T
Convertible A-pillar weatherstrip issues
  • thiefofcheese
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
364
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?