• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

carburetor and Intake Manifolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter N242
  • Start date Start date Jan 20, 2007
N

N242

Member
Aug 13, 2006
90
0
6
Jan 20, 2007
#1
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #1
hi

i have a dilemma about carburetor and Intake Manifolds for
my engine. it is late model from lincoln (1988) .
i think to buy holly 4150 600 CFM whith Weiand Stealth .

what are you thinking about this option ?
and what are yours recommendation?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 20, 2007
#2
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #2
Good choice. Other good intakes are Ford's A321, the older C9OX, Edelbrock F4B, Performer RPM.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 20, 2007
#3
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #3
What 88 Lincoln ? Town Car or Mark VII? The Mark had the HO motor, the T car had the base 5.0. but still a roller motor, just different heads, cam and pistons.
 
N

N242

Member
Aug 13, 2006
90
0
6
Jan 20, 2007
#4
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #4
I dont know but i think its a town car because the Firing Order is 15426378 .
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 20, 2007
#5
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #5
Yea, that would be the "base" 5.0. Look at the front corner of the passenger side head, should be a large "S" cast next to the valve cover.
 
N

N242

Member
Aug 13, 2006
90
0
6
Jan 20, 2007
#6
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #6
so how mach hp and torq my engine output ?

and know what are recommendation about carburetor and Intake Manifolds
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 20, 2007
#7
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #7
You have the right combo in mind for sure.

If you have never dealt with a Holley carb before though, make sure to read up on it and understand how it works and how to supertune it.

Don't become one of those guys that hates Holleys and bad mouths them only because they didn't take the time to learn the carb. Then they have a bad experience and blame it on a good piece of equipment, not their own ignorance

My .02
Dave
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 20, 2007
#8
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #8
N242 said:
so how mach hp and torq my engine output ?

and know what are recommendation about carburetor and Intake Manifolds
Click to expand...

Hp was something like 150-175 I don't recall what the torque specs were. This is basically the same 5.0 that came in the 86 Stang, but with less cam. I carbed a similar 88 Crown Vic 5.0 for my Ranger's first swap engine using a Perfomer RPM and a 600 Holley. I did bump the power some by using a set of 1.7 Cobra roller rockers and removed the thermactor bumps from the exhaust ports on the E6 heads. Worked great, just wasn't a drag strip terror.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 20, 2007
#9
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #9
ratio411 said:
You have the right combo in mind for sure.

If you have never dealt with a Holley carb before though, make sure to read up on it and understand how it works and how to supertune it.

Don't become one of those guys that hates Holleys and bad mouths them only because they didn't take the time to learn the carb. Then they have a bad experience and blame it on a good piece of equipment, not their own ignorance

My .02
Dave
Click to expand...

this is good advice with any carb you might choose. the current crop of holley carbs have had many deficiencies eliminated, and they have become an excellent street carb. i still prefer the edelbrock carb to the holley.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 20, 2007
#10
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #10
double post
 
N

N242

Member
Aug 13, 2006
90
0
6
Jan 20, 2007
#11
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #11
rbohm said:
this is good advice with any carb you might choose. the current crop of holley carbs have had many deficiencies eliminated, and they have become an excellent street carb. i still prefer the edelbrock carb to the holley.
Click to expand...


why?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 21, 2007
#12
  • Jan 21, 2007
  • #12
N242 said:
why?
Click to expand...

reliability
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 21, 2007
#13
  • Jan 21, 2007
  • #13
bnickel said:
reliability
Click to expand...

that is one reason, but finer tunability with the edelbrock is another. since you can change metering rods as well as jets, you can get finer control over the fuel curve you need for your engine. where as with the holley, unless you get one that has been modified, you can really only change jets and power valves, and/or complete metering blocks. either way you dont have as fine control over your fuel curve with the holley.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jan 21, 2007
#14
  • Jan 21, 2007
  • #14
Reliability is NOT an issue with Holleys.

They are very reliable when tuned properly.
That goes back to my statement about knowing the carb so you don't impune it's reputation.

Holleys are as tuneable as they need to be.
My .02
Dave
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 21, 2007
#15
  • Jan 21, 2007
  • #15
ratio411 said:
Reliability is NOT an issue with Holleys.

They are very reliable when tuned properly.
That goes back to my statement about knowing the carb so you don't impune it's reputation.

Holleys are as tuneable as they need to be.
My .02
Dave
Click to expand...

Ditto, a carb is only as good as the person who tunes it. That goes for any carb, or fuel injection too for that matter. The other big factor in how a carb runs is a clean fuel supply. The last Holley I rebuilt was discarded by the previous owner becasue it ceased to function. When I took it apart, the primary fuel inlet filter was plugged solid with red mud. The PO never bothered to install a filter between the tank and carb. The secondary filter was spotless, which told me, he never bothered to tune it to where the secondaries would open.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 21, 2007
#16
  • Jan 21, 2007
  • #16
my only problem with holley's has been blown power valves. i still prefer edelbrocks as you have a finer control over the fuel curve.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
670
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
523
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
266
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
242
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?