• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

caster camber toe...

  • Thread starter Thread starter US muscle
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2005

US muscle

New Member
Sep 23, 2004
7
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#1
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #1
I lowered my mustang ( little over an inch) and i'm bringing it in for an alignment. What are some optimal caster camber and toe numbers which will give me good tire wear but still have adequate cornering stability? Ford sets it at -.5 camber, + 3.2 caster, and + .25 toe stock... should i go with a little more negative camber for better handling -.8? Or keep it the way ford says..
 

Jones331

Banned
Oct 2, 2004
142
0
0
Oakland CA
Apr 5, 2005
#2
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #2
Tell them you want your caster at 6 degrese and youre camber at NEGITVE 1.1-1.2 and factory toe specs at 3/32nds TOTAL TOE IN ........youre welcome in advance.............jj
 

Thundermouse

Member
Sep 17, 2003
168
3
18
Decatur, GA
Apr 5, 2005
#3
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #3
did you get new caster and camber plates? if not you're pretty much stuck with whatever caster you have.
 
W

Will Smith

New Member
Aug 8, 2004
191
0
0
Cape Coral, FL
Apr 5, 2005
#4
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #4
u can't change the rear that much. but as for the front I would get the TOE to be as close to zero on both sides. as far as caster goes i would just make sure that ur wheels are in the middle of the wheel wells and that they are both even in front. as for caster I have mine set i believe its a positive camber which is when the lower part of the tire is sticking out more than the top but not too much. that should improve your cornering and your lessen the outside tire wear when u corner.
 

MadonnaRioRedGT

New Member
Sep 11, 2003
41
0
0
Houston/Waco, Texas and Colorado Springs, Colorado
Apr 6, 2005
#5
  • Apr 6, 2005
  • #5
Like said before...

Unless you have aftermarket fully adjustable caster/camber plates, your caster is NON-ADJUSTABLE.

As far as your camber and toe, it is best to keep your alignment fairly close to the stock specifications. You could requestion a slight increase in negative camber if you like for the front tires, such as -0.8 total camber, for a bit better negotiation and handling of turns.

- Brian
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
483
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
612
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
337
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
334
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?