• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

change from 1.6 to 1.7s

  • Thread starter Thread starter steel1212
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2005
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 7, 2005
#1
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #1
I was wondering about rocker arm ratios. I don't have this option on my dyno2000 and was wondering what kind of change I would see in hp/torque by switching these?
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Dec 7, 2005
#2
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #2
Do the math and change your cam specs. That should be close.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 7, 2005
#3
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #3
Ok, umm what would be the formula or should it be on dyno2000 somewhere?
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Dec 7, 2005
#4
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #4
Lift should jump to .544 and .050 duration about 1*.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 7, 2005
#5
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #5
Thanks, how did you calculate that? Also how did you know my lift to start with I'm retarded its in my sig.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 7, 2005
#6
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #6
duration goes up in a small percentage of the net increase in lift. it is small enough that i usually ignore it personally. as far as lift specs go, take the valve lift and divide it by the rocker arm ratio, then multiply that result by the new rocker arm ratio. that will give you the new valve lift. example;

.480/1.6=.300
.300x1.7=.510
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Dec 7, 2005
#7
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #7
Comps cam 280H for the 289/302 is 0.512" lift using the 1.6 ratio rockers with a 230 duration at 0.050 (this is from their web site). Your cam lobe (I and E) measures 0.320". Multiply the cam lobe by whatever Ford SB ratio rockers you want to try = your new lift. As for more duration it is minimal and I usuall do not add it in either.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Dec 7, 2005
#8
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #8
From the dyno sheets I've seen:

If you are already using a high lift (performance) cam, you won't see much benifit (maybe 5 hp).

If you are using a lower lift cam (stock grind) then there will be a larger increase in power (Up to 20 hp in a stock 5.0)
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 7, 2005
#9
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #9
so after plugging it into my dyno it only nets about 2hp and no more torque. Does that sound about right? Do you have to have bigger springs as well to account for the extra lift?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 7, 2005
#10
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #10
No matter what, there will be an increase overall, and this is essentially "free" horspower, being that the 1.7's cost the same as 1.6's do, if you're swapping from stock rockers to rollers. Only thing you'll need to watch for is exceeding the maximum compressed height of the springs you're using ( if not changing them at the same time) I think, 70Nitrous eater's observation may have been in error, the gains with a stock cam shouldn't be any more different than with a bigger cam, the specs he saw may have been due more to a change in rocker type ( stock to roller)
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 7, 2005
#11
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #11
70_Nitrous_Eater said:
From the dyno sheets I've seen:

If you are already using a high lift (performance) cam, you won't see much benifit (maybe 5 hp).

If you are using a lower lift cam (stock grind) then there will be a large increase in power (Up to 20 hp in a stock 5.0)
Click to expand...


Yeah, thats about what I saw on it, not really worth the extra dough for a couple of hp. It will probably net me a little more in real world as I would be going from just a roller tip to a full roller rocker though.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dec 7, 2005
#12
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #12
You will probably not feel a sotp difference. It will give you more power though. If you are planning on changing rockers anyway, you might as well go with 1.7's.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Dec 7, 2005
#13
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #13
D.Hearne said:
I think, 70Nitrous eater's observation may have been in error, the gains with a stock cam shouldn't be any more different than with a bigger cam, the specs he saw may have been due more to a change in rocker type ( stock to roller)
Click to expand...


Nope.. Think of it this way: After you open the valve a certain distance, there will become a point where opening the valve any further won't make much of a differancein airflow. With a high lift cam and 1.6:1 rockers you are already getting to that point..stepping up to the 1.7:1 rockers gives more lift but this extra lift doesn't make much of a difference anyway. But with a stock lower lift grind, the added lift of the 1.7:1 rockers makes for a larger increase in hp.

An analogy: You take a V8 that's built for a 650cfm carb and you replace the carb. Stepping up to the 750cfm might gain you a few extra hp, but stepping up to a 900cfm carb wouldn't make any more power that the 750cfm.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dec 7, 2005
#14
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #14
70_Nitrous_Eater said:
Nope.. Think of it this way: After you open the valve a certain distance, there will become a point where opening the valve any further won't make much of a differancein airflow. With a high lift cam and 1.6:1 rockers you are already getting to that point..stepping up to the 1.7:1 rockers gives more lift but this extra lift doesn't make much of a difference anyway. But with a stock lower lift grind, the added lift of the 1.7:1 rockers makes for a larger increase in hp.

An analogy: You take a V8 that's built for a 650cfm carb and you replace the carb. Stepping up to the 750cfm might gain you a few extra hp, but stepping up to a 900cfm carb wouldn't make any more power that the 750cfm.
Click to expand...

Well that is true, but it takes a lot to reach that point. That has to correlate with the compression and total lift on the cam. Usually when the lift is too much you will be close to .600 lift depending on the engine. I wonder how that stock cam would respond what you are saying makes sense to me, but it doesn't seem that the stock cam is so terrible that the .032" of lift would make that big of a difference.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 8, 2005
#15
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #15
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
Well that is true, but it takes a lot to reach that point. That has to correlate with the compression and total lift on the cam. Usually when the lift is too much you will be close to .600 lift depending on the engine. I wonder how that stock cam would respond what you are saying makes sense to me, but it doesn't seem that the stock cam is so terrible that the .032" of lift would make that big of a difference.
Click to expand...
Ditto, couldn't have said it better
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 8, 2005
#16
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #16
70_Nitrous_Eater said:
Nope.. Think of it this way: After you open the valve a certain distance, there will become a point where opening the valve any further won't make much of a differancein airflow. With a high lift cam and 1.6:1 rockers you are already getting to that point..stepping up to the 1.7:1 rockers gives more lift but this extra lift doesn't make much of a difference anyway. But with a stock lower lift grind, the added lift of the 1.7:1 rockers makes for a larger increase in hp.

An analogy: You take a V8 that's built for a 650cfm carb and you replace the carb. Stepping up to the 750cfm might gain you a few extra hp, but stepping up to a 900cfm carb wouldn't make any more power that the 750cfm.
Click to expand...
I see what you're saying here, but I think that would happen only in rare cases with the switch in ratio.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 8, 2005
#17
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #17
I've got the magnum roller tip rockers on there now with the 1.6s so I would be buying new ones if I went to 1.7s. On the beehives I'm guessing they are like a progressive spring?
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Dec 8, 2005
#18
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #18
I just won a set of full roller Scorpions at the PRI show and contemplated getting 1.7s, as they are free. My Maverick has a fairly mild XE256 in it, and I was thinking maybe the 1.7s would make a little bit of difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
713
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
538
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 2:38 PM
joeybuddy96
J
Suspension Quad shocks
  • keel
  • May 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
381
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2026
Mustang5L5
Forced Induction V3 pulley change
  • JD1964
  • Sep 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
928
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 21, 2025
JD1964
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
109
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?