flipnsac said:If you're on a tight budget (like most of us) you might be better off just getting an intake spacer for $40. Same HP claim for much less money:
http://www.mustangtuning.com/mu4gtinsp1.html
stangman said:ummm......NO. there's a BIG difference in a claim & being able to back it up. no spacer is gunna put down 8+rwhp
flipnsac said:I didn't say it was guaranteed to put down 8rwhp, just said it claimed to, just like the plenum ads do and the spacer ad does:
http://www.mustangtuning.com/mu4gtinsp1.html .
Only way to know for sure is a before & after dyno run. But if this guy was trying to save money on a cheap plenum, I was trying to give him a less expensive alternative. I've seen guys on this and other forums say they've dyno'd after installing after-market plenums and gottten only 1-2 rwhp, if that. Caveat Emptor.
Skeptics should address the advertisers not the messenger.
stangman said:the messenger apparently knows better, & shouldn't spread something he knows full well isn't true. & if ya want to get all technical like, very few dyno runs couldn't be argued after being done
flipnsac said:Man, have someone remove that hair up your a$$.
The truth is, I don't know for a fact whether or not the spacer helps to get 7-8rwhp. Stop putting words in other people's mouths. Like I said only dyno runs can prove it. This info is already on the internet on Mustang Tuning and Steeda's websites. Take your BS to them.
BennyDaBall said:This is the same peice as the C&L under a different brand name... $50 cheaper...
Red35th said:For the few that care the C&L is designed and made in America. The GMS crap is a direct ripoff and their stuff almost always comes from China.
Not a big issue, just tossing it out there...
stangman said:no said hair to be removed. i'm just stating it the way it is. if you don't like it, learn what your trying to talk about, come back, & try again skippy. & here is the problem with what you said...........
you said go get this product it has the same claims. the guy goes & gets it (hoping to save some money), realizes it didn't do anything, & then has to turn around & buy the right part. that's money spent twice. most people don't have the money to be spending twice. so ya see....i'm just looking out for him. & ya know what, i'd do the same for you if you posted a thread & someone else was spewing out misinformation
flipnsac said:Please stop putting your words in other peoples' mouths. Your take is not what I said. Everyone has to make up their own mind in the end. (CAVEAT EMPTOR- MF) Now go away............. but before you do, prove to everyone that a spacer doesn't do what it's advertised to do. Otherwise, you are just spreading your assumptions.........and if your proof is backed up by facts, I will go along with it.
flipnsac said:If you're on a tight budget (like most of us) you might be better off just getting an intake spacer for $40. Same HP claim for much less money:
http://www.mustangtuning.com/mu4gtinsp1.html
stangman said:i'm not putting words in anyones mouth. you said it, didn't know what you were talking about, deal with it. i ain't mad& just cause you were wrong don't try & point the other way & take the attention away from the point. it's been done, if you want proof, go do some research
Nice cop-out....
People make up their mind on proven facts IE: Dyno results and actually hold and using the product.flipnsac said:Please stop putting your words in other peoples' mouths. Your take is not what I said. Everyone has to make up their own mind in the end. (CAVEAT EMPTOR- MF)
flipnsac said:Now go away............. but before you do, prove to everyone that a spacer doesn't do what it's advertised to do. Otherwise, you are just spreading your assumptions.........and if your proof is backed up by facts, I will go along with it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?