• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Check out the new RSC-GT Mustang!

  • Thread starter Thread starter retrobuilt
  • Start date Start date Sep 21, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 21, 2007
#1
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #1
Hello, I'm new here and looking for some feedback on our new RSC-GT Mustang. We are scheduled to go into production on this car by year end. They are a steel body conversion completely reskinning the car from the top of the doors down. The car is over a foot longer and 3" wider at the quarters. We'd like some constructive criticism or any positive input you may have. Some things are subject to change depending on input. Thanks for looking, Tony

Go to: Retrobuilt.com
 

06 roush

New Member
Jun 20, 2006
44
0
0
Sep 21, 2007
#2
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #2
i dont like the hood or rear end section . just my opinion
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 21, 2007
#3
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #3
I'm not sure what to think. Hrm... I guess there's just too many things done to it to make it look like a 67/68. It looks like someone wanted a '67, but couldn't find one, so they made their own. Kind of like the S197 kit for the SN95. I like the taillight panels and the rear hips. The hood isn't bad. The side is too plain and really makes it look like a kit car. The side scoop/recess doesn't fit the body right.

A lot of time and money went into it, and for what it is, it was done well. But I think it's over the top. It would look a lot better with modern versions of most of the modifications.
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 21, 2007
#4
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #4
Well, the idea was to kinda go backwards and use less of the modern stuff. Unfortunately you can only do so much to a production car, we did not want to reinvent the wheel we just wanted to add more of the old styling cues to the new chassis and in the meantime maintain the warranty, crash zones, airbag sensors etc. for DOT and legal reasons.
 

BlackSpirit

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
6
0
1
California
Sep 21, 2007
#5
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #5
Not too hot on it. JMO.
 

05wolfkiller

Member
Sep 4, 2006
114
0
16
pearland, texas
Sep 21, 2007
#6
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #6
i like it. but i would shorten the height of the hood scoop towards the front of the car just a tad. otherwise it looks great
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 21, 2007
#7
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #7
The hood design is going to go, we have another one under way, we may offer a couple of choices on hoods..Glad you like it...T
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 21, 2007
#8
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #8
I agree with DarkFire alot. The back looks good except all the stuff going on with the bottom of the bumper I would buy the rear panel treatment for the tail lights The front is too much. It reminds me of Sid from Ice Age.


It would probably look better without the bottom "bumps" on the bumper and the scoop needs to be set further back(and smaller)as wolfkiller mentioned. Perhaps more the KR style scoop would look more appealing to me as well. The hips look awesome Overall I give a B+. The only drawbacks are the above mentioned items.
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 21, 2007
#9
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #9
Thanks, I love the comparison to Sid, good catch, I have kids, maybe thats where that came from....T
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 21, 2007
#10
  • Sep 21, 2007
  • #10
retrobuilt said:
Thanks, I love the comparison to Sid, good catch, I have kids, maybe thats where that came from....T
Click to expand...
 
B

bluecar

Member
Feb 19, 2007
99
0
6
SF CA
Sep 22, 2007
#11
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #11
Honestly, aim for more subtlety and not so 'in your face.' Too much goin on in front view and back view while side view just looks like an unsuccessful attempt to change the 08 into something more retro. 20" wheels IMO are tre' ghetto'

As you probably know, be certain of your market segment/niche and price points.

No intent to disparage, but I wouldn't have one.
 

dvf1973

New Member
Sep 10, 2007
0
0
0
savannah
Sep 22, 2007
#12
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #12
kooldawg6 said:
I agree with DarkFire alot. The back looks good except all the stuff going on with the bottom of the bumper I would buy the rear panel treatment for the tail lights The front is too much. It reminds me of Sid from Ice Age.


It would probably look better without the bottom "bumps" on the bumper and the scoop needs to be set further back(and smaller)as wolfkiller mentioned. Perhaps more the KR style scoop would look more appealing to me as well. The hips look awesome Overall I give a B+. The only drawbacks are the above mentioned items.
Click to expand...

and coffee just came out of my nose...thats hilarious....
 
R

Riggs

Member
Mar 31, 2005
151
0
17
Linden, NJ
Sep 22, 2007
#13
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #13
I think it looks alright, the hood is a little long and I am not a fan of the rims 20" is a little too big I like to see some rubber on muscle cars, 18"s I always felt are the largest rim that should be put on a mustang or any car for that matter 20" + is meant for trucks and SUV's
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 22, 2007
#14
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #14
Maybe if you fill those useless holes in on the Saleen rear bumper, it might help the rear end tremendously. I don't know that the Saleen S281 bumper is the right bumper for this kit, though. It's a retro kit. The retro Stangs had small rear ends. The new Stangs rear ends are already large. The Saleen S281 rear end makes it larger. The California Special rear end, or Saleen Heritage rear end would probably be a better choice.

Again, these are only our opinions. Either way, there's a lot of hard work in the car, and fit and finish look fantastic.
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 22, 2007
#15
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #15
We agree. the useless holes in the bumper are going away and the center exhaust is going to change, the rear of the car is a real challenge since it is soooo tall to begin with. We started with the saleen unit because we needed the recessed tail panel look to accommodate the thickness of the billet overlay. We put the license plate back down into the bumper cover so we could keep the lines of the aluminum panel. We are reworking the hood and rear bumper covers now, hopefully in a week or so I'll have something everyone will like a little better. Thanks again for the input.
p.s. We shortened the hood 2" after these photos were taken, it kinda had a "beak"...T
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 22, 2007
#16
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #16
Looking forward to the updates
 
S

stanmckinney

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,188
5
49
Sep 22, 2007
#17
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #17
Sorry, don't like it at all. My cat has puked up better looking things.
Harsh, but honest.
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 22, 2007
#18
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #18
Sorry you don't like...I hope your cat feels better too...Thanks for the input, Tony
 

lightblade

Member
Aug 7, 2004
366
0
17
Sep 22, 2007
#19
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #19
MHO, Yuk.
 

Scootr68

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
102
0
0
Tallmadge,OH
Sep 22, 2007
#20
  • Sep 22, 2007
  • #20
I can almost live with the back end but that front end is horrible.Sorry, just my .02
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
New to Mustangs/Fords
  • Joradan93Foxbody
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
139
The Welcome Wagon Mar 2, 2026
Joradan93Foxbody
J
T
Service Fluid Recommendations for 2015 Paxton Supercharged GT
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
137
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 25, 2025
ThotTrap
T
1
Electrical 1985 mustang gt Led conversion trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Jan 5, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
636
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2026
1985fox
1
L
2005 gt mustang overheating sensor/failsafe mode
  • lyndenbouw
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
255
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2025
Noobz347
R
New mustang
  • Roach88
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
202
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?