itsaMustangtoo said:
Blue thunder, I used the 8.8 rear because it was the exact dimension I needed to use the 99 fox pony wheels. ( NO CUTTING JUST INSTALL & GO )But with so many II's running the 8" rears and All the fox GT's running 8.8's , what is wrong with it?
In the day I use to like rubbing the GM peoples noses in how difficult to set up and weak their 12 bolts were/ are in comparason to the 9". Use to like pointing out it took a real setup to need a 9" but I guessed their 12s were good enough for a Chevy.
I was a ball buster way before there was an Internet and Toasters.
What's wrong with an 8.8??
Really, nothing. Not now.
The strengths of the 8.8, far as I can figure, is their pretty strong. They'll take more than an 8 but not as much as a 9. To actually
need a 9" you have to make some serious twist.
The 8.8 is also lighter than a 9. The Old Unsprung Weight Deamon/ problem/ argument.
And the 8.8 is more efficent than the 9".
I'm not sure where the 8.8 and the 8 compare in these last two.
The main strength of the 8 and 9 inch is the removable carrier and the ability to have multiple chunks on the shelf ready to go.
Granted this was most important in the years between Over Drive (Dad ran an OD in the 50's). In those years a racer would drive a pretty good distance to get to a deacent track, swap gears and run. Then swap back.
I'll finish this later. Theres a symphony of Thunder and I need to be outback to hear it.