• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Chevy Engine in Ford Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter sicK96GT
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

sicK96GT

New Member
Oct 30, 2006
63
0
0
Austin (College in Waco)
Feb 6, 2007
#1
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #1
http://www.nmratv.com/index.php?stream=http://www.streetlegaltv.com/video/features/Heretic-P1_Intro.flv&playlist=21


so what do you guys think?


I kinda have mixed feelings, BUT 1000HP TT MY GOD MAN.






Im just happy they didnt put a 4 banger honda engine in it..
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Feb 6, 2007
#2
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #2
can i have the left over 3V?

Edit: wait they baught a V6
guess they wouldn't need to buy a GT huh?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Feb 6, 2007
#3
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #3
i wanna see the thing run damnit! They have done crap, anyone can just take out the engine, let's something special!
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Feb 6, 2007
#4
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #4
waste of effort

there are plenty of decent enough looking GM cars to put an all-out LS engine into...and plenty of interesting non-stock Ford engines they could have used (427 SOHC in an 06, how cool would that have been)...

instead they end up with something that, while technically interesting, is neither fish nor fowl...

nope don't like
 

Tally_4.6

Member
Feb 26, 2006
195
0
17
Orlando
Feb 6, 2007
#5
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #5
Dumb.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Feb 6, 2007
#6
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #6
A lot of Chevy guys do this for some reason. I've never heard of it going the other way.
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Feb 7, 2007
#7
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #7
COramprat said:
I've never heard of it going the other way.
Click to expand...

thats b/c ford motors suck

I love it you get the amazing performance of the LS7 motor plus the looks of the Mustang

heres another GM powered mustang:
 

Attachments

  • insane.webp
    7.7 KB · Views: 196

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Feb 7, 2007
#8
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #8
COramprat said:
A lot of Chevy guys do this for some reason. I've never heard of it going the other way.
Click to expand...

back in the early 80's I put a 351C in a 67 Firebird ...

I had it in a '66 fastback but nobody would race me anymore, they said the Mustang "was too light"...it couldn't have had anything to do with the Cleveland being a kick butt engine...

it used to be a GM swap was easier because of the shape of the oil pan and the length of the block, but that hasn't been the case for a couple decades...


(and that LS swap would have been an order of magnatude better in something like a Saturn Sky rather than a Mustang)
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Feb 7, 2007
#9
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #9
The Ford mod motors are more expensive to make as fast as the GM LS engines, not to mention the HUGE hole we start out with.

Ford isnt going to be making a 500hp N/A 5.4 4V anytime soon.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Feb 7, 2007
#10
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #10
streetstang03 said:
thats b/c ford motors suck

I love it you get the amazing performance of the LS7 motor plus the looks of the Mustang

heres another GM powered mustang:
Click to expand...

That pic is a local guy...

Ford has some pretty good old stuff...but newer tech seems to be lost on them. Short of NASCAR you don't see the kind of power GM or Dodge puts out.
 

Attachments

  • insane.webp
    7.7 KB · Views: 186

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Feb 7, 2007
#11
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #11
Chevy's are just plain cheaper to build
 

GToddyT5

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
553
0
16
Hamilton, NJ
Feb 7, 2007
#12
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #12
04DarkShadowGT said:
The Ford mod motors are more expensive to make as fast as the GM LS engines, not to mention the HUGE hole we start out with.

Ford isnt going to be making a 500hp N/A 5.4 4V anytime soon.
Click to expand...

The lack of pushrods and cubes will do that. Although stuff for the LS engines isn't cheap.
 

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Feb 7, 2007
#13
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #13
merc123 said:
Chevy's are just plain cheaper to build
Click to expand...

I've always heard the opposite?

Maybe it's different when talking about modding stock cars vs building up a new engine.

Hell if I know.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Feb 7, 2007
#14
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #14
it used to be really common...
 

eliza

New Member
Feb 8, 2007
1
0
0
lambertville, nj
Feb 9, 2007
#15
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #15
im actually consitering going with an LS1 in my car, hope i dont get shot at for that lol. but i happen to agree with the power of a chevy and the styling of a mustang.
 

GToddyT5

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
553
0
16
Hamilton, NJ
Feb 9, 2007
#16
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #16
eliza said:
im actually consitering going with an LS1 in my car, hope i dont get shot at for that lol. but i happen to agree with the power of a chevy and the styling of a mustang.
Click to expand...



But seriously, it would be cheaper and easier to drop a built 302 or 351 based engine in there than to go through all of that trouble. Stuff for the windsors is cheaper than the LS1's.
 

eliza

New Member
Feb 8, 2007
1
0
0
lambertville, nj
Feb 9, 2007
#17
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #17
haha. well so much for that then.

anyways, at the risk of being hypocritical, if you look at specs and comparisons between the two, the ls1 is definately a better souce of hp gains. although more expensive, sometimes you just gotta do what you gotta do.

but its still up in the air.
 
B

BLUE03GT

New Member
Jul 13, 2003
281
0
0
Sunnyvale, Ca.
Feb 9, 2007
#18
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #18
Because Ford cant produce enough power to reach 1000hp.... hahah

Bull****... you can take any ford motor and make 1000hp... for cheaper than buying a damn LS7 and adding turbos to it... i bet that car breaks down 10x becuase of the chevy stuff in there
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Feb 10, 2007
#19
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #19
There are quite a few guys with fox body mustangs with 434+ BBC motors.

However you can make 1000 rwhp with a single turbo LS2
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Feb 10, 2007
#20
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #20
you can make 1000hp with a 4.6 also
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
1968 Ford Mustang Without Through A Supra To 2jz Turbo Engine
  • geo0006
  • Mar 28, 2014
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 4, 2014
38stang
Ford Mustang Themed Pinball Machine
  • MRaburn
  • Feb 6, 2014
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
1
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Feb 6, 2014
Noobz347
First 2015 Ford Mustang To Auction For Charity
  • MRaburn
  • Dec 21, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Dec 21, 2013
MRaburn
Mrt Interceptor Axle Back For 2013+ Ford Mustang
  • MRaburn
  • Dec 2, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
3K
StangNet Site News Dec 2, 2013
MRaburn
2015 Ford Mustang Official Intel
  • MRaburn
  • Dec 5, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Dec 5, 2013
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?