• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Chevy rod on Ford crank?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SoCalCruising
  • Start date Start date Nov 28, 2006

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Nov 28, 2006
#1
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #1
I'm researching a combo and want to know if a 5.7" Chevy rod can be used on a Ford crank. I know I can get the Chevy crank pin and pistons with a Chevy pin, but I'm not sure about the rod width. Are they the same? Or, if not, can the Chevy rod be machined "thinner" so it will have proper side clearance on the Ford crank pin?
Thanks.
 
6

66bluepony

New Member
Nov 7, 2004
75
1
0
Nov 28, 2006
#2
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #2
5.7

Yes the chev rod can be narrowed to ford width. What is your crank, piston combo for 5.7 rod.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 28, 2006
#3
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #3
as stated, yes a chevy rod can be used on a ford crank with some machine work. that said however the 5.7 chevy rod is nearly .6" longer than a stock ford 289 or 302 rod, and wont fit in the stock ford block. it is also .2" shorter than a 351w rod which makes it easy to stroke the 351, but the rod/stroke ratio goes in the tank. if you plan on using a chevy rod in the 289/302 block, use a 400 chevy rod instead. it is shorter (5.565 compared to 5.7).
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Nov 28, 2006
#4
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #4
Nah. None of that.
I'm researching the use of a 8.7" tall-deck 302 block (Dart). Crank would be 3.5" stroke with 302 mains/Chevy pins (not off-the-shelf) and bore is 4.125". That makes 374ci in a package only slightly larger than a standard 302. Rod ratio is friendly at 1.63 and piston compression height is 1.24" (off-the-shelf). I'm now determining all of the tall deck-specific parts, other than the rotating assy [push rods, distributor(?), intake manifold (not many choices)]. Headers are a question mark, but some of the poorer fitting ones (Super Comps that hang a bit low, anyway) might fit okay. Shorties would work, of course.

If not too many parts are unique, then I will consider it reasonable. It would fit nicely between the frame rails of an early Mustang and other narrow engine bay cars (Falcon, Comet, etc.) and make nice power.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Nov 28, 2006
#5
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #5
Whats the point of going with the Chevy rods? Arnt there ford specific rods that would work for your application? Are Chevy rods better then similar Ford products?
The only reason I question this is that in my old 289, the previous owner tried to use chevy rods, and it played a part in the engine giving up. Probably wasnt done properly.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Nov 28, 2006
#6
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #6
1.75" (stroke/2) + 5.7" (rod) + 1.24" (c-h) + 8.690
which (nominally) leaves the slugs .005" in the hole on a tall deck 302 block that has been decked .005". The piston is a Probe off-the-shelf piece for a 4.125" bore. I'm not sure about the crank - might have to be a Scat 7000 peice. The rods at 5.7" work and aftermarket Chevy rods are plentiful, light-weight and relatively cheap.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Nov 28, 2006
#7
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #7
Are they Ford pistons? Or 400 Chevy pistons? What valve reliefs are cut?
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Nov 28, 2006
#8
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #8
most stroker kits I see run chevy rods. All 3 versions of my cleveland stroker have used chevy rods. Nature of the beast, common sizes, readily available....
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Nov 29, 2006
#9
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #9
Ford pistons (with respect to valve relief location) using Chevy piston pins. Quite common in aftermarket slugs. Cranks are also commonly available with either Chevy or Ford pins. The trick will be to find an off-the-shelf crank with 3.5" stroke, 302 mains and Chevy rod pins. I've seen them used in magazine builds for big-inch short deck (standard 8.2") strokers, but I don't recall if they were custom or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
643
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Electrical 88 EEC Injectors batch firing ?
  • Dustin 86GT
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
427
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 8, 2026
gkomo
N
Power door lock motor Question
  • NYFox
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
249
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2026
NYFox
N
Engine Distributor Interchange List
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Friday at 4:58 PM
Noobz347
J
Car Diagnosis
  • j.2016
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
3
Views
323
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 31, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?