• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Cobra IRS

  • Thread starter Thread starter SetofAces
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2009
S

SetofAces

New Member
Jan 22, 2009
103
0
0
SF Bay Area
May 16, 2009
#1
  • May 16, 2009
  • #1
Anyone have it? I've heard that it can hurt straight-line performance (at least from a standing start), but how much does it help out handling?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
May 16, 2009
#2
  • May 16, 2009
  • #2
Do a search, there was one pretty big thread on it.
Biggest problem with an IRS is that sticky tires break the axles, and level 5 axles are $1600 a pair, ouch.
 
S

SetofAces

New Member
Jan 22, 2009
103
0
0
SF Bay Area
May 17, 2009
#3
  • May 17, 2009
  • #3
2000xp8 said:
Do a search, there was one pretty big thread on it.
Biggest problem with an IRS is that sticky tires break the axles, and level 5 axles are $1600 a pair, ouch.
Click to expand...

Wow, that sucks . . . . I suppose now the questions is, would I be better off spending all that money on awesome coilovers, panhard bar, etc. etc., or would a built IRS rear-end have more potential? enough to matter on the street as well as the track (track-days are going to be a rare luxury for me I think, at least until I finish school)
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
May 17, 2009
#4
  • May 17, 2009
  • #4
SetofAces said:
Wow, that sucks . . . . I suppose now the questions is, would I be better off spending all that money on awesome coilovers, panhard bar, etc. etc., or would a built IRS rear-end have more potential? enough to matter on the street as well as the track (track-days are going to be a rare luxury for me I think, at least until I finish school)
Click to expand...

From what I have read the IRS handles well in stock base form, but most people prefer the TA/Panhard setup over it

BTW coil overs will be needed for handeling on either setup
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
May 17, 2009
#5
  • May 17, 2009
  • #5
Solid rears are just as good any day as an IRS.
The only spot where an irs shines is when cornering and going over bumps at the same time.

I really don't think coil overs are needed, just good springs and shocks. Just keep in mind if you plan to use a torque arm, you need a difference set of springs for at least the rear.

Me personally i feel due to axle cost, the solid is the way to go.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
May 17, 2009
#6
  • May 17, 2009
  • #6
2000xp8 said:
Solid rears are just as good any day as an IRS.
The only spot where an irs shines is when cornering and going over bumps at the same time.

I really don't think coil overs are needed, just good springs and shocks. Just keep in mind if you plan to use a torque arm, you need a difference set of springs for at least the rear.

Me personally i feel due to axle cost, the solid is the way to go.
Click to expand...

I agree with axle, not so much with the good springs thing, coil overs place the weight distribution further towards the outside of the car, they allow you to lower the center of gravity more and as far as ease of changing spring to coil over springs there is no comparison, plus coil overs look cool
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
May 17, 2009
#7
  • May 17, 2009
  • #7
Shaolin Crane said:
I agree with axle, not so much with the good springs thing, coil overs place the weight distribution further towards the outside of the car, they allow you to lower the center of gravity more and as far as ease of changing spring to coil over springs there is no comparison, plus coil overs look cool
Click to expand...

They also interfere with tire clearances up front (sometimes depending on rims and tires) and wear out extremely quick when used on the street for a car that sees decent usage. You can't expect a spring half the size to wear the same.

I wouldn't go as far as to say i don't like them, i just don't put them on the priority list as far as handling goes.
I do like the idea of popping them in and out at will extremely easy.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
May 17, 2009
#8
  • May 17, 2009
  • #8
2000xp8 said:
They also interfere with tire clearances up front (sometimes depending on rims and tires) and wear out extremely quick when used on the street for a car that sees decent usage. You can't expect a spring half the size to wear the same.

I wouldn't go as far as to say i don't like them, i just don't put them on the priority list as far as handling goes.
I do like the idea of popping them in and out at will extremely easy.
Click to expand...

your gonna have clearance issues up front no matter what if you wanna run a decent sized tire, im running 275 up front, yes took some modification to fit, but the whole car took some modification and i dont think ive ever heard of a coil over spring failing before a regular spring
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Electrical A9L Schematic
  • Mrg2783
  • Jul 29, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
308
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2025
Mustang5L5
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
211
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
3
Hammer shifter problems
  • 387lx
  • Apr 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
130
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 11, 2026
General karthief
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
617
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
Vacuum line question?
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
137
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?