• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

coil bind on a 351C

  • Thread starter Thread starter porkchop
  • Start date Start date Jul 18, 2005
P

porkchop

Founding Member
Aug 17, 2002
101
0
0
Waxhaw North Carolina
Jul 18, 2005
#1
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #1
i am goind from a 280H with .530 lift to a 284Xe with .584/.588 lift. the valve springs have about 3,000 miles on them and they came in the comp cams 280H kit when i got my motor rebuilt. so will i need to replace the valve springs and/or will i need to get the heads machined to recess the valve springs.
 

shotsy

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
233
0
0
Oklahoma City
Jul 18, 2005
#2
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #2
If you put the 924-16 springs in with the 280H you should be ok moving up to the 284xe cam, the optimum spring acording to comp cams web site is the 930-16.
Here's the link to all of the info


http://www.compcams.com/Technical/CurrentCatalog/HTML/92-97.asp
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 18, 2005
#3
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #3
If you heads don't already have screw in studs and guide plates to allow adjusting the lash, you'll need to do that also with that cam.
 

69 Rustang

Member
Jun 9, 2004
307
0
16
Orange County California
Jul 19, 2005
#4
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #4
You will need to change springs to the matching set from Comp Cams otherwise you will have coil bind and bend your pushrods (or worse). I know because when I was younger I made that error.... As for needing to do any machining--none should be required, but do check your rocker pivot to ensure that you do not get binding in the rocker arm at the slot. As they are bolt down pedistal rockers, you do not need to put in studs.
 

Mach1steve

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
95
0
0
Burlington, Ont.
Jul 20, 2005
#5
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #5
no studs

I agree, studs should not be needed, but upgrade to the recommended "premium spring for that Cam.
Valve float & spring bind can be catastrophic to your engine.
I had to machine the valve spring seats in the heads slighly larger when I went to a .560 lift Cam, but it was a different Cam maker (Cam Research), because the spring Outside Diameter was larger than stock springs.

Mach1steve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
235
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
704
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
240
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
Fox 89’ GT 331 stroker, Trickflow upper/lower, TF#3 Cam, stuffed with forged goodies.
  • 08GT500
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
732
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
08GT500
2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
311
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?