• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Cold Air intake for 2004 GT Steeda? MAC?

  • Thread starter Thread starter farbyhardcore
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2004

farbyhardcore

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
98
0
0
East Coast
Oct 11, 2004
#1
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #1
I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions for a cold air intake for a 2004 GT. I have been looking at the Steeda GT High-Flow Air Kit, and at the MAC GT 85mm Mass Air System. I have heard that an after market intake can cause prolems with your engine warning lights and such. Steeda claims that their kit won't cause the warning lights to turn on. Anyone have any suggestions betweeb these two kits, or any suggestions for another brand? The car is a show car more than a race car, and I'm looking for an intake to more or less dress up the engine. Thanks.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Oct 11, 2004
#2
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #2
Which ever one is mo' pretty to you. I'd really suggest staying away from the MAC w/ MAF system. Their MAF, just like the C&L MAF, simply reuses the stock electronics in a slightly better flowing tube. The best result you can get from this is a bit more power, and you would get this at the expense of a potential leaning issue (this is HOW there MAF makes power) that could be dangerous, especially if mixed with other mods and/or cheap gas.
Brand for Brand, Steeda will beat MAC allday, everyday.
 

Sick96Stang

New Member
Aug 20, 2004
621
0
0
Gilbert, Arizona
Oct 11, 2004
#3
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #3
Densecharger best CAI IMO and I believe u can get that with an MAF also.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Oct 12, 2004
#4
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #4
i would also recomend you stay away from the maf people seem to complain about them, that is prob. what you hear about the check engine.

a regular air kit will not cause the check light to come on, ive had cai on my car for 3 almost 3 years.

first i had mac regular fender cai, now i have the steeda. i really could not tell a power difference just by driving, but there may be a small one.

as far as quality the steeda crushes the mac. steeda wins in looks too.
 
T

Tunez4523

New Member
May 26, 2004
36
0
0
Concord, NC
Oct 12, 2004
#5
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #5
I'll take my MAC Straight Shot over the Steeda CAI anyday of the week.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Oct 12, 2004
#6
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #6
No need for a bigger maf. Do a search and you can find hundreds of threads on CAI's.
 

KronicRacer

Member
Jun 23, 2004
502
1
18
puttering around Ft Lauderdale, FL
Oct 12, 2004
#7
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #7
you only need a bigger MAF if youre pushing close to or over 400hp. other than the stock application is sufficient.
 
R

Rocketman

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
730
0
0
SoCal
Oct 12, 2004
#8
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #8
If you want the Bling, go with a BBK CAI.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Oct 12, 2004
#9
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #9
How about none? CAI's are worthless......when will people learn?

Put the money towards gears or longtubes.
 
X

XStanger

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
383
0
16
Oct 12, 2004
#10
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #10
I agree with Gino, I just have a K&N drop in and I think that is fine. But I agree, stay away from running a bigger maf sensor.
 
T

tangerine

Member
Apr 6, 2003
555
0
16
millen, ga
Oct 12, 2004
#11
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #11
GinoGT said:
How about none? CAI's are worthless......when will people learn?

Put the money towards gears or longtubes.
Click to expand...

100% agree. if you are going to buy one jlt true cold air is supposed to have the best gains out of them all and it comes painted to match the car which to me looks better than chrome. definately don't buy a maf. the way the make power is by leaning the car out. I wouldn't worry about one until you peg out the 5 volt reference.
 

Premium Speed

New Member
Apr 22, 2003
1,006
0
0
Houston, Texas
Oct 12, 2004
#12
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #12
unless you are buying it for looks, save your money and maybe put a drop-in K&N filter in there

if i had to choose.....steeda
 
H

hpjack

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
15
0
0
torrance california
Oct 12, 2004
#13
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #13
We sell and install Steeda & Mac ,bbk .New mac straight shot is by far the best now! With or without mass air. Yes steeda and mac ss are the only ones that gain Good hp on dyno test. And the mac ss blow's away steeda with it's internal velocity stack,fit and finish.Have 85mm SS mass air system afr now at 13.1. Mac moves pick up location for calibration on stock with larger mass air works great so far.Good price also. Was Steeda supporter till Straight Shot.
 

farbyhardcore

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
98
0
0
East Coast
Oct 12, 2004
#14
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #14
GinoGT said:
How about none? CAI's are worthless......when will people learn?

Put the money towards gears or longtubes.
Click to expand...

I'm getting the jist that if i was to get a CAI i should go with the Steeda, which is what I was leaning to anyway. But my next question is, besides not having any real power gaining benifits, is an after market CAI detremental to your engine? Like suppose you didn't care about the HP and were mostly concerend with making your engine more flashy. Is a CAI a good idea or no?
 

KronicRacer

Member
Jun 23, 2004
502
1
18
puttering around Ft Lauderdale, FL
Oct 12, 2004
#15
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #15
it does change the exhaust note. it made the stock catback deeper. just enough nothing out of this world.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Oct 12, 2004
#16
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #16
the steeda and the mac ss seem to be exactly the same if you are not useing the maf with the mac. how is it making more hp? that internal veloity stack? what the heck is that anyway?

i asked this question about 2 months ago while researching, but no one had an answer so i just went with the steeda.
 

w00t

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
334
0
0
Arlington TX
Oct 13, 2004
#17
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #17
I agree with the above. Leave it stock unless you are pushing 400+HP
 
S

Steeda2004GT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
98
0
0
Daytona Beach, Florida
Oct 13, 2004
#18
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #18
I have the MAC. I don't really know if it did anything but it sure does look good in there.
 

farbyhardcore

New Member
Oct 5, 2004
98
0
0
East Coast
Oct 13, 2004
#19
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #19
MAC

Steeda2004GT said:
I have the MAC. I don't really know if it did anything but it sure does look good in there.
Click to expand...

Have you had any problems with engine lights since you installed it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
285
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
377
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
S
01 GT NO IDLE
  • Scwhitten
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
225
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Electrical Issues with my 2006 mustang gt
  • VerneVdV
  • May 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
79
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 22, 2026
VerneVdV
T
Cold air intake 1990 GT
  • Tom77
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
546
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 30, 2024
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?