• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

crosswind intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kreacher5.0
  • Start date Start date Feb 27, 2006
K

kreacher5.0

Member
Feb 27, 2006
122
0
16
Feb 27, 2006
#1
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #1
Im switching from a offenhouser low rise 360 to a crosswind am i gaining or losing power
 

BIG-MAC

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
82
0
0
Dallas
Feb 27, 2006
#2
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #2
What's a Crosswind?
 

68rustang

Active Member
Jan 17, 2003
1,537
0
36
Cleveland, OH
Feb 27, 2006
#3
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #3
Hey BIG-MAC,

Anymore pics of the car in your avatar?
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Feb 27, 2006
#4
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #4
Since the Offy is universally dissed, I'd say you're gaining power. However, the Professional Products intakes are getting their share of dissing too.

I put a Pro Products dual plane on my kids' '65, because for a polished intake it was about $100 cheaper than a polished Performer. Obviously I was going for bling as much as performance. I think the price gap has narrowed, and if I were doing it again I think I would go the few dollars more and get the real deal -- an Edelbrock Air Gap, or a Weiand Stealth.

I definitely would not get one of those Pro Products "real chrome" units. Something tells me those aren't going to hold up over the long haul.

I've always had this reservation about any of these Air Gap intakes for street use, and that is that they are bound to take awhile to warm up the carb in cold weather. If you get right on the freeway and can cruise to normal operating temperatures, it won't be a prob, but if you have to head into stop and go first thing in the morning, I think it will definitely be a problem.
 
K

kreacher5.0

Member
Feb 27, 2006
122
0
16
Feb 27, 2006
#5
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #5
power plus crosswind its a rip off the edelbrock rpm air gap
 
K

kreacher5.0

Member
Feb 27, 2006
122
0
16
Feb 27, 2006
#6
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #6
so whats the diff in real deal and the rip off?
 

BIG-MAC

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
82
0
0
Dallas
Feb 27, 2006
#7
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #7
68rustang said:
Hey BIG-MAC,

Anymore pics of the car in your avatar?
Click to expand...

sure...check my garage
 

BIG-MAC

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
82
0
0
Dallas
Feb 27, 2006
#8
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #8
kreacher5.0 said:
power plus crosswind its a rip off the edelbrock rpm air gap
Click to expand...

OK thanks...
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Feb 27, 2006
#9
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #9
I've got a air gap on my 302. I also have an electric choke as well. I don't let the choke go for very long before I idle it myself. I haven't noticed any differance as far as warm up time compared to the performer I had.
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Mar 1, 2006
#10
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #10
kreacher5.0 said:
so whats the diff in real deal and the rip off?
Click to expand...
Real deal (Edelbrock) and rip off (Professional Products):

1. Edelbrock: Made in USA, so foundry workers, machinists, and front office personnel put their earnings and tax money back into our economy.

PP: Made in China, so workers' wages stay in China. U.S. consumer money to China supports corrupt regime that, in turn, supports U.S. enemies (North Korea, Iran, etc.). Exploits workers and encourages increasingly stratified Chinese caste system. Contributes to $800,000,000,000 (and growing) annual U.S.-China trade deficit.

2. Edelbrock: Invested in the R & D that created the product; Edelbrock has moral claim to profit from its own ideas; dollars siphoned off by copycat products leaves Edelbrock with fewer dollars for future R & D.

PP: R & D consists of how best to copy others' products, i.e., to make it easier to copy more.

3. Edelbrock: better quality control; core-shifted castings rejected and not shipped; the "little things" are all seen to.

PP: Core-shifted castings shipped; consumer must check and gasket match, or reject castings and try to get money back from retailer. The "little things" are ignored

(Admittedly this last category is the regurgitation of the Edelbrock, and the whole "made in U.S.A." movement's, company line. I don't have first hand data. I didn't even check for gasket match with the PP intake I put on my kids' '65. I have no complaints about it, either.)
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Mar 1, 2006
#11
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #11
The casting and machining quality of the Stealth is far better than the E-brock - I had both for my 331 build and trashed the E-brock. I will say, however, that the E-brock came with more hardware (plugs, bracktes, etc.) than the Stealth and is, therefore, a more complete product.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 1, 2006
#12
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #12
180 Out said:
Real deal (Edelbrock) and rip off (Professional Products):

1. Edelbrock: Made in USA, so foundry workers, machinists, and front office personnel put their earnings and tax money back into our economy.

PP: Made in China, so workers' wages stay in China. U.S. consumer money to China supports corrupt regime that, in turn, supports U.S. enemies (North Korea, Iran, etc.). Exploits workers and encourages increasingly stratified Chinese caste system. Contributes to $800,000,000,000 (and growing) annual U.S.-China trade deficit.

2. Edelbrock: Invested in the R & D that created the product; Edelbrock has moral claim to profit from its own ideas; dollars siphoned off by copycat products leaves Edelbrock with fewer dollars for future R & D.

PP: R & D consists of how best to copy others' products, i.e., to make it easier to copy more.

3. Edelbrock: better quality control; core-shifted castings rejected and not shipped; the "little things" are all seen to.

PP: Core-shifted castings shipped; consumer must check and gasket match, or reject castings and try to get money back from retailer. The "little things" are ignored

(Admittedly this last category is the regurgitation of the Edelbrock, and the whole "made in U.S.A." movement's, company line. I don't have first hand data. I didn't even check for gasket match with the PP intake I put on my kids' '65. I have no complaints about it, either.)
Click to expand...
DITTO Unless the product is something not offered by American companies, I try to buy American. PP stuff is just a cheap rip-off of something Edelbrock spent time and money to develop.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Mar 1, 2006
#13
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #13
Ditto Ditto!
Besides, who in their right mind would buy that POS when a new Stealth is within $1 of the same price? Pro-Products QC on those intakes SUCKS!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
All power lost at crank
  • saf_blu302
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
192
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 12, 2026
General karthief
C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Tuesday at 1:02 PM
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
20
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Tuesday at 1:02 PM
chasecollier1984
C
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
36
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
248
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
68 horn and turn signals stopped working
  • connella08
  • Sep 10, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
241
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 10, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?