• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

cylinder heads for daily driver - kinda long -sorry

  • Thread starter Thread starter starchiefus
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
64
St Paul
Aug 2, 2010
#21
  • Aug 2, 2010
  • #21
starchiefus said:
OK, so from my understanding a warmed over set of milled E7's will be best for my application.Keep the intake valve small -for velocity and throttle response- and increase the exhaust slightly for better scavenging?

So I'm thinking i might attempt a basic port and polish of a set of E7's, I'm sure i can find some from the local pick-n-pull. I understand the chamber is 62cc is this correct? And is it .006" per 1cc when milling? And anything over .020 would require the manifold to be milled as well?

Gasket match intake/exhaust ports and intake manifold.

Blend intake walls, finishing with 80 grit to retain some texture.

Remove thermactor hump and blend and polish exhaust walls, is it worth increasing valve to 1.55 from the stock 1.45?

Polish combustion chambers.

Will be referencing the standard abrasives article and diyporting.com

And GT40's are not good because of the 1.7 rocker ratio, right? Or can they be used with 1.6 rocker arms?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

All this work you are describing on the E7s will cost you near $1000 bucks unless you have a buddy in the business. Get budget aftermarket, bolt em on and go. E7s are doorstops.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
67
tucson,az
Aug 2, 2010
#22
  • Aug 2, 2010
  • #22
starchiefus said:
OK, so from my understanding a warmed over set of milled E7's will be best for my application.Keep the intake valve small -for velocity and throttle response- and increase the exhaust slightly for better scavenging?

So I'm thinking i might attempt a basic port and polish of a set of E7's, I'm sure i can find some from the local pick-n-pull. I understand the chamber is 62cc is this correct? And is it .006" per 1cc when milling? And anything over .020 would require the manifold to be milled as well?

Gasket match intake/exhaust ports and intake manifold.

Blend intake walls, finishing with 80 grit to retain some texture.

Remove thermactor hump and blend and polish exhaust walls, is it worth increasing valve to 1.55 from the stock 1.45?

Polish combustion chambers.

Will be referencing the standard abrasives article and diyporting.com

And GT40's are not good because of the 1.7 rocker ratio, right? Or can they be used with 1.6 rocker arms?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

all this work is going to cost you, as indicated, about $1000. and in the end you wont gain as much performance as just bolting on a good set of aftermarket heads like the world products windsor jr heads that run about $900 ready to bolt on with 1.94in/1.60ex valves made from stainless steel, and include new valve springs and are set up for screw in rocker arm studs. by the way, my advice for street heads, DO NOT POLISH the ports. leave them as cast for better performance.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Aug 2, 2010
#23
  • Aug 2, 2010
  • #23
rbohm said:
good set of aftermarket heads like the world products windsor jr heads
Click to expand...

Thats a bit of a contradiction in my opinion...

I still think the gt40P heads are the best bet. Small chambers, small ports, small valves, cheap, readily available, yet flow much better than E7s.
 

starchiefus

Member
Dec 17, 2003
43
1
7
San Diego
Aug 2, 2010
#24
  • Aug 2, 2010
  • #24
Not sure i can use the GT40p's with my JBA shorty headers, if i can let me know because i saw a pair at the junkyard last Friday.

Thanks.
 

starchiefus

Member
Dec 17, 2003
43
1
7
San Diego
Aug 2, 2010
#25
  • Aug 2, 2010
  • #25
Well i just did a quick Google on GT40p and shorty headers, looks like all i would need to do is just change the spark plug wires to 90 degree boots because of the different plug angle or is there something else?

Thanks.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Aug 2, 2010
#26
  • Aug 2, 2010
  • #26
Ooohhh, you didnt mention the shorty headers. I sort of assumed you had stock manifolds. Not real sure what to tell you there. Ive heard of people using shorty spark plugs and 90* plug wires, but I think you would need to just try it and see if it works or not.
 
A

ajfriz

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
18
0
0
Aug 2, 2010
#27
  • Aug 2, 2010
  • #27
Most of the time you have to get special headers for the gt40p heads ($$$). You can run 1.6 or 1.7 rockers on gt40 heads, but why would you want to run 1.6? 1.7 ratio will give you more power and have less friction since they are roller rockers. You shouldn't have any piston to valve clearance problems with your cam, but it would still be a good idea to check if you did use 1.7 ratio rockers.

Just like everyone else said, by the time you do what you want to with those E7s you're going to be more money than just buying some better flowing heads and bolting them on. GT40 or 40p heads are a 30+ hp bolt on.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
64
St Paul
Aug 3, 2010
#28
  • Aug 3, 2010
  • #28
Another thing about E7s, regardless of your opinion of them: They have no resale value.

If you spend a grand on em, it's down a hole. I put some Performers RPMs on my car, knowing full well that if I upgrade later, I could get 75% of the money back for em on ebay. Stock heads go for dirt.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Aug 3, 2010
#29
  • Aug 3, 2010
  • #29
rbohm said:
dont go too big on the heads with a mild 289. you want something that will give you good port velocity, and still allow for good breathing at the higher rpm ranges. a good head for your engine is going to be something like the world products windsor jr heads. they have better ports than stock, and have 1.94in/1.60ex valves. if you want an aluminum head then the edelbrock performer rpm heads, or the afr185 heads are also good on your combination. too big a port or valve and the engine will fall on it face.
Click to expand...

Good post. I agree with the AFR185. AFR has a study posted on their web site where an otherwise stock 302 made more power with 185s than with 165s EVERYWHERE from idle all the way to red line.

I would buy a set of GT40s IF you can find them in great condition, not worn out. If you buy them worn out, by the time you pay to get everything fixed you're getting close to the price of aluminum heads. Beware of cash for clunker refugees - a lot of V8 Explorers went down that way.

Buy once, buy something good. Give yourself room to grow. You'll thank me later. I always tend to try to get away cheap and it's not uncommon that I end up nickel and diming myself too much and I don't get as much as I could have for the money. I have GT40s on my Fox Mustang, but they were low mileage and already had port work done. If you can find something like that, then it could be a good deal.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 3, 2010
#30
  • Aug 3, 2010
  • #30
Max Power said:
Another thing about E7s, regardless of your opinion of them: They have no resale value.

If you spend a grand on em, it's down a hole. I put some Performers RPMs on my car, knowing full well that if I upgrade later, I could get 75% of the money back for em on ebay. Stock heads go for dirt.
Click to expand...

But at the same time, you can pick em up(E7's) for nearly nothing. Which is what I did with a couple sets. The first I paid $50 for, spent an afternoon porting and polishing, sent them off to the machineshop for a valve job and new springs ($100 for the job done with a Serdi machine for the seats and another $80 for new springs) That was nearly 10 years ago and they're still doing the job on a third short block. The other set I got for free and so far have just the porting job I did on em. They got shelved afterwards.
 
B

bocksta

Member
Apr 30, 2003
66
0
6
rhode island
www.cardomain.com
Aug 5, 2010
#31
  • Aug 5, 2010
  • #31
Lots of good choices for a street motor . I would stick with a 1.94 head and stay away from the 2.02's if you want to keep the low end power.
I have the windsor jr's and JBA shorties i like the combo but the plug wires are very close to the headers and the spark plugs choices(shorties) are limited due to header clearance.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
64
St Paul
Aug 6, 2010
#32
  • Aug 6, 2010
  • #32
D.Hearne said:
But at the same time, you can pick em up(E7's) for nearly nothing.
Click to expand...

This is true. If you can find a set where someone else already did all the work, they can be a reasonable deal. I doubt the OP has the equipment or knowledge to do his own porting.
 

starchiefus

Member
Dec 17, 2003
43
1
7
San Diego
Aug 6, 2010
#33
  • Aug 6, 2010
  • #33
Max Power said:
This is true. If you can find a set where someone else already did all the work, they can be a reasonable deal. I doubt the OP has the equipment or knowledge to do his own porting.
Click to expand...

I have the equipment but the not the knowledge, best i could safely do would be a gasket match. I've decided to go with either the GT40P's with hi-po manifolds (I will check my JBA shorties for fit and will grind on them if necessary) or Edelbrock E-streets, which seem like a warmed over stock head in aluminum that will fit the needs of my mild engine.

I'm not looking for any future improvements, no interest in horsepower. this is to be a daily driver and once i get my 55 Pontiac/LS1 conversion done it will be my Wife's driver. ( being from China she actually surprised me that it "would be cool" to drive the Stang).
http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/images/smilies/jaw.gif


Thanks again for the replies.
 

S-Car-Go

Member
Mar 25, 2003
332
0
16
San Jose, CA
Aug 7, 2010
#34
  • Aug 7, 2010
  • #34
You may want to send your 289 heads to this guy.
http://www.hunterstyle.com/thumper/

He knows what he is doing. I had a stock 94 mustang commuter and didn't want to hassle with CA smog laws. I used some thumper E7s and a ported intake. Seat of the pants improvement was substantial. The reason I thought this might work for you is because everything you have fits now. Pull your heads and have Mike go through them, port them and put them back on w/o geometry issues or header issues, etc. No surprises, no hassles is good. You don't seem to need large heads or aluminum.

Stay away from Power heads. They did some heads for me in the 90's and they sucked. Poor QC.

If you are going to use Pro-jection 3, you may also want to check out the new Holley Avenger TBI (minutes away from being released). It is self learning and set to compete with the Projection and FAST EZ TBI kits.

No, don't use a single plane intake with a TBI, but possibly a dual plane with an open spacer.

Last thought. Think about swapping some 3.25 gears into your rear end. You are pushing an aerodynamic brick through 70 mph wind. You probably use more throttle than you should making your 289 work. It won't hurt to bump your rpms to 17-1800 rpms.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
855
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
379
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
946
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine An engine building combo with stock Speed Density (SD) system
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
962
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2025
Mcmahst
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?