• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

DD'ing a 4beater stang??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Makdaddymac
  • Start date Start date Mar 5, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

Makdaddymac

New Member
May 28, 2005
323
1
0
orlando
Mar 5, 2008
#1
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #1
hey guys, i was thinking about getting another fox, a coupe 4 cyclinder

i know the 2.3l is a legend if maintained. and these 4 bangers are a dime a dozen, well maybe not the coupes anymore,but i found one for 1200 auto coupe with a/c.

what i want to do is buy one, but i want to know if it is worth it. like if they are reliable, and how are the auto's in those things......im sick of driving stick and my VW is stick, my 5.0 is almost converted to stick, and i would love to have a auto.... i also have a good aod thats coming out of the 5.0, could it slap right into the 4 cyclinder if needed??? or is it two much shiot to do.........
i want to sell my 00' vw gti vr6 and dd the 4 banger mustang cause i cant have 3 cars....
RWD!!!!!! plus more MPG!!!!!!,PIP insurance!! COUPE!!!!!=
the only thing is i will have a 88 5.0 for balls, and a 2.3 for mpg , i would just like to slam it, dont worry no 20's or altezzas, just slam it with some pony's and low profile tires, some tinted windows, and tune-up!!!!!!!!
im just looking for ideas, gas prices are rising and my vr6 gets almost 20mpg and 27 highway.... i figure the 2.3 would be 22-25 and 30 highway. which might not be too much better, but i would love to see a coupe in my yard,lol.... slow or not!!!!

opinions wanted and appreciated
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Mar 5, 2008
#2
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #2
I was just on Autotrader. Most coupes 2.3L's were 1,200-3,600. Remember...that is asking.


What one asks is much different than what one sells it for. Start low, and work up.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Mar 5, 2008
#3
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #3
The four-banger Foxes don't get THAT good of mileage, usually. Some folks can somehow squeeze out 30 MPG, but more likely you'll be doing good to see 25 MPG from one, especially if you're running an auto (the 5spd will, of course, get better mileage, maybe 27 MPG). Around town, you're looking at 19 MPG, at which point you may as well be driving a 5.0 anyhow.

I wouldn't pay more than $1,500 for a pristine four-banger Fox, myself. Most of them go for between $500 and $1,500 down here. I'd avoid getting an automatic four-banger if at all possible, too, because not only does it cut into your mileage but it REALLY saps what little power these things have to start with (I think they're only rocking a whole 88 horsepower).
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Mar 5, 2008
#4
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #4
I started out with my first car, 1990 Mustang LX Notch 2.3, 5 speed. Great car, I beat the piss out of it and it never gave me a dime of problem.

i will recomend the manual tranny though, the auto's are a sluggish and hurt the MPG
 

Juiced88Coupe

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2001
367
0
0
Austin, Texas
Mar 5, 2008
#5
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #5
Flavadave4 said:
I started out with my first car, 1990 Mustang LX Notch 2.3, 5 speed. Great car, I beat the piss out of it and it never gave me a dime of problem.

i will recomend the manual tranny though, the auto's are a sluggish and hurt the MPG
Click to expand...

No joke, mine cant even get out of its own way.....
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Mar 5, 2008
#6
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #6
If you get one, I would recommend putting a timing belt on it right away. These guys on TV did a special on the 2.3L Mustang engine. It was very interesting because even though it ran good, they found a few horsepower by doing this because the belt actually jumped time because it was so worn. They also found MPG doing this as well because the engine was more efficient.
 

LiquidGT

Member
Oct 8, 2007
368
0
16
Near STL hell
Mar 5, 2008
#7
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #7
There arent any 2.3 Mustangs around here anymore, I see one about every 3 months or so. lol
 

5.0Torx

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
252
3
29
Mar 5, 2008
#8
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #8
im kinda in the same boat. Ive also been considering a taurus SHO. should get the same mileage as most 4 banger foxes, but be able to hang with a stock 5.0. plus you have 4 doors, a nicer interior, and the complete aggravation of constantly feeling like its being dragged by the front wheels. seriously though, for the tradeoff of rwd, i'd rather have that V6. its a really sweet engine.

just something else for you to consider.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 5, 2008
#9
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #9
My 1993 with the 105 hp motor was pretty slow but not "that" bad. Mpg was actually so so. Got low low 20s around town, middle 20s on the highway. The issue is you always have to be in the throttle to pass, merge, or just keep with traffic. 3000 lbs is 3000 lbs no matter how small the motor moving it is. I liked the idea, decided on it, and then changed my outlook and got something better and more comfortable (although a lot more money).
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 5, 2008
#10
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #10
my 93 vert got about 15-18 in town and 26 on the hwy. a 5.0 gets that kind of mileage if you treat it right.

of course I had the gas peddle mashed to the floor the whole time too.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 5, 2008
#11
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #11
My 5.0 got 26-27 on average down to South Carolina.
 

carbed87

Member
Jun 5, 2005
215
0
16
Mar 5, 2008
#12
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #12
thats my scenario right now, i have a 93 2.3 lx hatch 5spd, and to be honest i love it more then my 5.0
 

5.0Torx

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
252
3
29
Mar 5, 2008
#13
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #13
my best mpg in my 5.0 has been 23 mpg city, 31 mpg highway

worst has been 16.7 city (had a huge exhaust leak and a gas tank leak, plus it was cold) and 21 highway

usually average about 20 city and 25 highway
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Mar 5, 2008
#14
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #14
i DD a 2.3 coupe everyday and love. it its economical (20-25 highway depending on driving habits) reliable and rides way better than aby V8 car ever will. i love it. to bad im swapping in a v8.
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Mar 5, 2008
#15
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #15
I'd DD a four banger Stang. Can't though. My garage is full of 5.0s and I'm not allowed to get anymore.

 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Mar 5, 2008
#16
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #16
carbed87 said:
thats my scenario right now, i have a 93 2.3 lx hatch 5spd, and to be honest i love it more then my 5.0
Click to expand...

 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 5, 2008
#17
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #17
I dd'd my 93 till about 3.5 weeks ago. never had a problem with the motor but the DIS has been giving me crap for about 6 months and it finally gave up. VatoZone wants like 120 bucks for the damn thing. so I yanked the 4 banger out and now I am prepping the engine bay for the exploder motor I am dropping in. I'll be getting an extra 200hp and I bet my gas mileage stays the same to boot.
 

Hissing Cobra

Founding Member
Jan 4, 2002
798
0
17
Massachusetts
Mar 5, 2008
#18
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #18
I daily drive an older, beat-up, fox. It's an '81, with a 3.3 liter straight 6/automatic combo. It's totally beat but runs like it's brand new. I love this car because I don't have to wash it too often, don't have to worry about dings in parking lots and invest hardly anything into it. When I'm done with it, it'll get stripped down to the unibody and I'll have extra EVERYTHING for my '79 Cobra.

The wiring harness, heater box, heater controls, guages, windows, screws, etc.... will all be saved and the carcass will be hauled away.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 5, 2008
#19
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #19
Well i don't know how my experience with my Merkur will help you but i absolutely love it. Of course it's got quite a bit more pep than a typical 2.3 being that it's turbo, and the ride and interior is a bit nicer but overall it's a solid DD. I get an average of 25mpg, and i do probably 85% city driving. A non turbo 5 speed car should do much better.
 
M

Makdaddymac

New Member
May 28, 2005
323
1
0
orlando
Mar 6, 2008
#20
  • Mar 6, 2008
  • #20
hey guys im going to go and look at a 88lx 4 banger(well maybe),,,,but i just thought about it and i realized i know ship about the 2.3ls, not the car that intimidates me it is the computer and maf, speed density..?? what are these things.....i think i want to slap a turbo on my 4 cyclinder project eventually and want the easiest way to do it!!!! do you cocnvert these tings just like the 5.0's should i be patient and just hunt for a 89+ 2.3L
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Hi
  • timotto
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
138
The Welcome Wagon Dec 14, 2025
91AOD5.0LX
S
Trying to decide if I should sell my 70 vert
  • Sixt9
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
151
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Sixt9
S
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
516
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
549
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?