• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

densecharger opinions???

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1994Vib.RedGT
  • Start date Start date Nov 18, 2004

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
Nov 18, 2004
#1
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #1
I was looking at the densecharger CAI's, although I know most on here are for making their cold air intake, I want to also have a little bit of show value to the Intake, so I was looking at a densecharger, and I know some people claim they are the greatest intake ever, but the guy at the local speedshop said they are *****. what is the general consensus?
 

95BLBLVert

Founding Member
Nov 2, 1999
486
0
0
Lake Wylie, SC
Nov 18, 2004
#2
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #2
I think they are a really nice system. If I didn't have a C&L system on mine already I'd put on of those on my car. Quality materials are used and they now offer carbon fiber overlay. They did just switch to Green Filters instead of K&Ns. Claim they make more hp/tq on the dyno.
 

jb89coupe

New Member
Sep 3, 2004
416
0
0
CT
Nov 18, 2004
#3
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #3
I had one on my 89. Worked fine, quality was good. I traded it for a mac chrome kit because it looked 10x better. The densecharger had a stockish look to it (which is fine), but it looked kinda weird sticking out of a polished cobra intake + polished tb/egr. I noticed no performance difference vs the mac.
 

SN95StangMan

New Member
Jul 5, 2003
1,292
0
0
Lynwood, CA
Nov 18, 2004
#4
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #4
I like it. Here's the problem- The opening on the cai is smaller than that of my MAF. I'm going to ditch it in favor of a home made cai whenever I decide to get off my ass. (never )
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Nov 18, 2004
#5
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #5
I ran one for a few years..no complaints...It works...
Looks wise it had no show value to me...its simple...unless they have the TB to maf pc now available???
All you have is your stock rubber to the exposed MAF, then the 90 sweep into the fenderwell...


I swapped it out for a homemade one....Looks wise i felt it was much nicer than the Dense...
 

95BLBLVert

Founding Member
Nov 2, 1999
486
0
0
Lake Wylie, SC
Nov 18, 2004
#6
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #6


No they don't but it looks better w/carbon fiber touch.
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Nov 18, 2004
#7
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #7
If you go to Densecharger website, youll notice it doesnt work. Thats because DeMolet Motorsports stopped making the Densecharger system and are trying to design something new. Its supposed to be out soon.
 

95BLBLVert

Founding Member
Nov 2, 1999
486
0
0
Lake Wylie, SC
Nov 18, 2004
#8
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #8
FlyBy763 said:
If you go to Densecharger website, youll notice it doesnt work. Thats because DeMolet Motorsports stopped making the Densecharger system and are trying to design something new. Its supposed to be out soon.
Click to expand...

Sorry dude but that's wrong. I sell their product. Website changed to :

www.tunableinduction.com or you can use www.demolet.com

Only changes are the Green filters and a lot more systems with Pro-M meters.
New things on the horizon but definitely did not stop production.
 
D

DaveB

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
637
0
0
Middlesex and Pomona, NJ
Nov 18, 2004
#9
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #9
I have one, but to be honest, should have just went with a k&n and saved some money.
 
C

cmozez

Member
May 3, 2003
450
0
16
Tupelo,Mississippi
Nov 19, 2004
#10
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #10
I have one on mine now and I love it. I like the low profile vis look to it.
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Nov 19, 2004
#11
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #11
95BLBLVert said:
Sorry dude but that's wrong. I sell their product. Website changed to :

www.tunableinduction.com or you can use www.demolet.com

Only changes are the Green filters and a lot more systems with Pro-M meters.
New things on the horizon but definitely did not stop production.
Click to expand...

my bad, so it just doesnt go by the Densecharger name anymore...
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Nov 27, 2004
#12
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #12
Do they not sell the pipe from the t-body to the MAF? They used to have it avaliable in carbon fiber look but I didn't see that piece on there for our 94-95's.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Nov 27, 2004
#13
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #13
The only carbon fiber looking piece is the piece that covers the fenderwall. Alot of people say the stock cai,with a K&N filter is the way to go.NO WAY,,I have one and noticed a huge difference in performance and sound
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine 4.6 Running rough at half throttle
  • jake411
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
170
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 4, 2026
jake411
J
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
206
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
863
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
414
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
721
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?