• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Did I score or strike out on this engine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 65ShelbyClone
  • Start date Start date Feb 25, 2007

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 25, 2007
#1
  • Feb 25, 2007
  • #1
A couple hours ago I picked this up:


Yeah, it's a 460.

It has a Performer 460 manifold on it, was rebuilt not long before being tossed outside, and has/had at least a gallon of rainwater in it. I started tearing it down and got hopeful when I saw crosshatching and minimal bore corrosion, but that changed when I saw the #8 piston. It looked like it fought with a broken valve at one time and there were some residual dings in the bore. The #8 intake pushrod was also kinda "S" shaped, Same with the #4 exhaust pushrod. I only pulled the driver's side head so far.

Anyway, it's a D1VE block and at least one of the heads is a D3. The other had D_VE on it. Only has an .030" overbore(4.390") and I haven't pulled the pan off yet to go poking around inside.

What do you all think? Was it worth $25?
 

Attachments

  • 460-1web.webp
    45.3 KB · Views: 107

whatagearhead

New Member
Feb 10, 2007
60
0
0
Chandler, AZ
Feb 25, 2007
#2
  • Feb 25, 2007
  • #2
pretty hard to get "hurt" on a $25 purchase - I say "you done good"
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Feb 26, 2007
#3
  • Feb 26, 2007
  • #3
What isn't worth $25?
 

Cupid

Member
Mar 30, 2006
162
0
16
Feb 26, 2007
#4
  • Feb 26, 2007
  • #4
You'd proly get $25 or more on fleabay for that intake alone...
 
N

Nemesis67

New Member
Jul 3, 2006
146
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Feb 26, 2007
#5
  • Feb 26, 2007
  • #5
I'd say you did just as good as the time I bought a 76 T-bird with a 460, C-6 and a 9" rear for $250. And it was driveable! Which I was going to transplant the engine and tranny into my 67 Fastback. But then sold it for $1000.
"One mans trash is another mans treasure."
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 27, 2007
#6
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #6
I should have put more smilies in my post.

I was being facetious...I know it was a good price at $25, even if it needs a rebuild. Regarding the intake, I planned on Ebaying that thing before I ever saw the engine.

I have a real question, though. What are the best iron heads to get for this engine? The ones that are on it have big ports by normal standards, but they don't look even as big as 4V Cleveland intakes. There isn't much room for porting, either. Maybe I should ask Thumper. I won't forget the shot of his fastback's BB with intake off and tennis balls stuck in the ports.

Not that I need iron heads on an 750lb engine....
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 27, 2007
#7
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #7
I think my friend has some PI heads that will fit that motor. I think they are suppose to be the super bitchen ultra cool setup for that motor. He just sold his 427 and I'm not sure if he gave the extra heads with the block or not.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 27, 2007
#8
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #8
I've never heard of PI heads for a 460. I though those were a 4.6 thing.

A 427 is ALOT different than a 429/460 also.



EDIT: Forgot the extra pics. Even more to come tomorrow. I'm tellin you, the gaskets are so fresh that the intake and heads just lifted right off! All the FelPro sealer rings look brand new! This engine has been sitting in the weeds for at least a decade!







 

Attachments

  • 460-2web.webp
    47.6 KB · Views: 114
  • blocknumber.webp
    14.1 KB · Views: 99
  • 460-3web.webp
    52.4 KB · Views: 96
  • 460-4web.webp
    60.2 KB · Views: 95

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 27, 2007
#9
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #9
Think old school man. PI as in Police Interceptor, not Performance Inhancement =-)
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 27, 2007
#10
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #10
Yeah, well, Ford keeps reusing the same abbreviations, so I get them mixed up!

I was thinking "Rusty 67 is a veteran around here, how could he mistake a 4.6 for a 460?"



I've had about 5 hours of sleep in the last 48 hours, so that should explain something.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 27, 2007
#11
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #11
LOL no problem, happens to me more often then I'd like to admit. Is that avatar a hand from an Eva ?
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 27, 2007
#12
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #12
Rusty67 said:
Is that avatar a hand from an Eva ?
Click to expand...



Yup. Not too many people recognize the anime avatars I use.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 27, 2007
#13
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #13
The 429/460 PI head is a combination for the std head and the CJ head. It had the smaller ports on the intake side (don't recall about the exhaust) and the larger CJ sized valves. Ford figured out the CJ ports were "too big" And this combo made more power. You can accomplish the same thing using the early 68-70 std heads and installing the larger valves along with the bowl work to match.
 

GrandeStang73

Member
Apr 16, 2005
93
0
6
VA
Feb 27, 2007
#14
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #14
That is deff. a good find for $25!! Alot of potential out of the motor, they're just heavy!! I've got a 351C sitting in my weeds in Northern VA too. Buttttt the heads have been off of it for sometime. Shoot.. $25 and it could be someones too.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 27, 2007
#15
  • Feb 27, 2007
  • #15
D.Hearne said:
The 429/460 PI head is a combination for the std head and the CJ head. It had the smaller ports on the intake side (don't recall about the exhaust) and the larger CJ sized valves. Ford figured out the CJ ports were "too big" And this combo made more power. You can accomplish the same thing using the early 68-70 std heads and installing the larger valves along with the bowl work to match.
Click to expand...

So do the CJs actually flow too much, or just flow a alot? I have a hard time imagining a 460 with a mushy low-end.
 

jes72mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
224
1
0
S. Central PA
Mar 2, 2007
#16
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #16
I found a 351C; block crank v4 heads, stock intake, stock exhaust, air cleaner on Ebay for $50 last fall. I basically got it for a song, a little more than you paid for the 460. But I only really wanted the block and crank, so I sold everything else and turned a nice little profit that will help with the build.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 2, 2007
#17
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #17
65ShelbyClone said:
So do the CJs actually flow too much, or just flow a alot? I have a hard time imagining a 460 with a mushy low-end.
Click to expand...

I'm just recalling what was written about them in "Ford Performance" According to Ford, the CJ's "Sewer pipe" sized ports flowed too much on a 429, I'd imagine with more cubes drawing thru them, they'd work better.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Mar 2, 2007
#18
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #18
While the ports look huge, they have some funky angles around the valve. Check out this mold taken from factory 429 heads vs Edelbrock heads:

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2006/12/MakingMolds/index.php
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Mar 2, 2007
#19
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #19
jes72mustang said:
I found a 351C; block crank v4 heads, stock intake, stock exhaust, air cleaner on Ebay for $50 last fall. I basically got it for a song, a little more than you paid for the 460. But I only really wanted the block and crank, so I sold everything else and turned a nice little profit that will help with the build.
Click to expand...

Dang, were they closed chamber? I'd have jumped on that deal too!

D.Hearne said:
I'm just recalling what was written about them in "Ford Performance" According to Ford, the CJ's "Sewer pipe" sized ports flowed too much on a 429, I'd imagine with more cubes drawing thru them, they'd work better.
Click to expand...

Alright, good to know. I haven't decided what to do with this engine anyway. Bracket racer, torque monster truck application, turbo BB in the Mustang....all up in the air.

One of the cylinders is really nasty from having water in it. I'll probably pull the rods and pistons this weekend. It'll need another overbore which will take it out to .060 over. What's the maximum these blocks can take safely without needing to worry about sonic checking?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
Drivetrain Rookie here! I need your Bracket car advice, tips and 2 cents worth.
  • MachUno
  • Nov 22, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 3, 2019
MachUno
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
3
New Member: 1978 M II Mach I
  • 351MooseStang
  • May 24, 2019
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
12
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 30, 2019
351MooseStang
3
M
I really wasn't expecting this....... First time Mustang owner.......
  • Mikedd969
  • Nov 27, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2019
Mikedd969
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?