• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Differences between the 94 and 95 models?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stanger007
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2006

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Jul 29, 2006
#1
  • Jul 29, 2006
  • #1
So what changes were made between 94 and 95 to identify the two years apart?
 

1TallMF

New Member
Apr 17, 2006
955
1
0
Montreal
Jul 30, 2006
#2
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #2
As far as I know, the only outside appearance difference is the front piece of the stock ground effects moulding. The '94 has just a straight piece whereas the one on a '95 curves upward in the wheel well:

94:


95+:
View attachment 452235


As far as interior changes go, I'm not sure, but it seems to me the ignition key cylinders are a different design. I could be wrong though.
 

Attachments

  • 94effectscopy.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 101

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jul 30, 2006
#3
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #3
1TallMF said:
As far as I know, the only outside appearance difference is the front piece of the stock ground effects moulding. The '94 has just a straight piece whereas the one on a '95 curves upward in the wheel well:

94:


95+:
View attachment 452227


As far as interior changes go, I'm not sure, but it seems to me the ignition key cylinders are a different design. I could be wrong though.
Click to expand...
Mine looks nothing like that on my '94
Sorry for the big images.

 

Attachments

  • 94effectscopy.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 110
  • Picture896.webp
    56.7 KB · Views: 105
  • Picture890.webp
    118.9 KB · Views: 101

HGFireHazard

Member
Apr 10, 2005
460
0
17
Michigan
Jul 30, 2006
#4
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #4
TheGreenGT said:
Mine looks nothing like that on my '94
Click to expand...

Is it just me or does it very much look the same

On my '95 my piece wraps around into the wheel well as written above, anyone else help confirm this difference?
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Jul 30, 2006
#5
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #5
Yeah, some early 95's had the straight piece as well. Funny you mention this but I always heard that 95s had different seat belt clickers so today when I was in my friends 95 cobra I snapped a picture of it with my phone. Ill let you know if its different tomorrow. Only other differences were colors available.
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Jul 30, 2006
#6
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #6
halfway through 95, Ford decided to go with rocker arms that folded along the wheelwell for a little paint protection
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Jul 30, 2006
#7
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #7
Here's some things a lot of people did not know about the two years....
In 95 they used an aluminum alloy in the frame to make it lighter....

If you look close at both the rear spoilers you will notice that the 95 tilts lower at the front to help with down force...


Also in 94 they used a different compound tire..............
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Jul 30, 2006
#8
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #8
........................ sorry ...had a moment...
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Jul 30, 2006
#9
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #9
drakesdad said:
........................ sorry ...had a moment...
Click to expand...
I was just about to raise the flag on you for that one.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jul 30, 2006
#10
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #10
HGFireHazard said:
Is it just me or does it very much look the same

On my '95 my piece wraps around into the wheel well as written above, anyone else help confirm this difference?
Click to expand...
The front kinda does, but the back dosent at all.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jul 30, 2006
#11
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #11
Not sure what you're saying Eric. Both of those first 2 pics are FRONT images. One is a '94-early '95. One is '95+ only.

In other words, most cars with the "straight skirt" are '94's. ALL cars with the "rolled skirt" are '95 or newer.


'95's have seat belt holder's on the top of the seats that actually work. The '94 holder's suck.



CLICK HERE to see the thread I started about this last year.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jul 30, 2006
#12
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #12
I knwe some one had started a thread like this I just couldn't find it, thanks Justin...
 

badstang123

New Member
Jan 17, 2006
397
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Jul 30, 2006
#13
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #13
I'm not sure if this was different for all of '95 or just part way through the year, but my car didn't have any of the recalls on it that many of the earlier one's had.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Jul 30, 2006
#14
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #14
SeventyMach1 said:
Not sure what you're saying Eric. Both of those first 2 pics are FRONT images. One is a '94-early '95. One is '95+ only.

.
Click to expand...
Ahh, I though the yellow one was the back.
 

HGFireHazard

Member
Apr 10, 2005
460
0
17
Michigan
Jul 30, 2006
#15
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #15
Really, my 95 seat belt holders stink, terribly. I thought about trying to take them off, reverse the sides they are on and flip them upside down, because right now they serve no purpose, at all.
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Jul 30, 2006
#16
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #16
SeventyMach1 said:
Not sure what you're saying Eric. Both of those first 2 pics are FRONT images. One is a '94-early '95. One is '95+ only.

In other words, most cars with the "straight skirt" are '94's. ALL cars with the "rolled skirt" are '95 or newer.


'95's have seat belt holder's on the top of the seats that actually work. The '94 holder's suck.



CLICK HERE to see the thread I started about this last year.
Click to expand...
+1 I totaly agree Justin I almost ended up with a 94 GT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Megasquirt base tune for 94 5.0
  • wrx757
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
167
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2026
wrx757
W
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
160
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
91
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
89 LX Electrical Troubles
  • fun331
  • Oct 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
321
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 27, 2025
fun331
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?